QUOTE (Don_S @ Mar 6 2004, 07:09 PM) |
Here's an update...
I tried the BIOS versions in decreasing order (latest ones first) starting with the 4981. Had reboot 3 times and FRAG (see post above). 4980 gave an error 13 4979.67 - flashed successfully and I was able to install EvoX. Everything seems to be functioning properly. I get the MS dashboard as usual with the chip turned off. With the chip enabled, it boots to the EvoX dashboard. I am therefore finally happy that I could get things working Wish I could have the latest BIOS, but for now I am happy. What is the advantage of the 4981 over the 4979, if any? (for those people that *DID* manage to get it working) |
Don thanks for your latest post. As a newbie (albeit a very well informed newbie) waiting for my 2.3b Lite to arrive via FedEx, this is very useful to me.
I find this really interesting. Obviously, if you flahsed with 4979.67, install Evox, see ms dash when off, and evox when enable your chip install is perfect.
This is DEFINITELY a 4981 issue, no question about it - you have proven that your chip works, and that 4979 works and 4981 does NOT. That's enough for me, I'm going to use 4979 and forget about 4981. Waayy too much bad mojo about that revision.
Did you use the topside of bottom side D0 point? Or did you go with the girly pinheader install?
Thanks... please do let me know. I think you have proven once and for all that there is absolutely an issue with 4981.
The only thing I can think of with ppl successfully running 4981, is that perhaps they have a 1.4 xbox and think it is a 1.5 - maybe the 4981 only runs ons 1.4 and under and simply does NOT work on a true known 1.5 xbox.... The saga continues.