QUOTE(joerehall @ Aug 21 2006, 05:14 AM)
Your arguing is pathetic, the entire time your trying to hold ground but your backpeddling trying to explain your self, if you explained yourself well enough and didnt state FICTION, not everyone here would disagree with you. All the stuff brought up about Sony and its Cell/1080p/BlueRay technology isn't a coincidence, and there isnt a perfectly legit reasoning behind why is plain out SUCKS. I could tell you to kick rocks and find a ps3fanboy board, but that would be immature, so please do me a favor and step back for a minute and look at all the technologies out there with a UNBIASED view.
If then you really thing blueray is still better, then so be it, but you sound like a little kid stating fanboy "facts" and when people disagree you do nothing but backpeddle
lol, I buy all the consoles so fanboy? no I'm not. There was once a time when I was defending the hell out of the 360 before it was launched and now I'm doing it for PS3 because I know people are wrong. Wtf is wrong with that? I don't have to defend the Wii because fanboys are so extreme that you don't have to.
You would take perfect legit reasoning, even though the console isnt OUT YET? That you don't even have one yourself, nor have any games to justify saying that, "oh well due to perfectly legit reasoning, this console sucks". My view is unbiased enough considering I bought all the consoles, and I bought my favorite franchises on each.
I can't exactly call these technologies "bad" because I don't have them yet, and to make assumptions based on secondhand information is plain retarded and would make me look like a f***** moron. I won't accept people's opinion (but will take into account) because merely one's views could be subjective. There could be a slight difference in contrast, and color saturation, and a videophile reviewer could be turning that, into the biggest difference in the world. But other people wouldn't see it that way, know what I'm saying?
I never exactly said, bluray was better, but I know the potential it has, so I'm being the smarter person by waiting to see what companies have up their sleeve. Technically, bluray IS better. How you can't see that attests to your lack of research. Both format's support the same codec. But Blu-Ray is bigger in size and both cost the same. So logically Bluray > HDDVD, but that is not so, because HDDVD is making better use of their space. Technically better does not translate exactly to better overall.
I've been repeatedly saying, that Sony always has the capacity to blow HDDVD out of the water anytime they felt like it and it is true. Their players support VC-1 and H.264. But they choose not to do this because current players aren't fast enough to decode 1080p in those codecs, therefore they choose 1080p through Mpeg2. Nowhere in your posts, have you tried to dispute this, and all you do is call me a fanboy and backpedaller.
It seems what you want to hear from me. Is that Bluray is not superior to HDDVD, and that the PS3 has inferior technology compared to the 360. That's what you want to hear, and I'm not providing it. Thats why you're going off on me with all this backpedalling nonsense. It looks like you can't read, and defend other's posts by calling me a backpedaller, when I'm just restating, or rephrasing what I said, due to a lack of understanding. I know that my posts are hard to read sometimes, and they get lost and think a totally different thing other than what I tried to convey in the 1st place. Yes I've been criticized about that on another forum.