Print

[geniusalz]

CODE

IF x THEN IF y THEN z ENDIF ENDIF

IF x OR y THEN z

CODE

IF x THEN z ENDIF IF y THEN z ENDIF

Or you could use GOTO's

CODE

IF x GOTO trueCondition IF y GOTO trueCondition GOTO falseCondition :trueCondition z :falseCondition

This is better in the sense that it doesn't require writing z twice.



Don't think as skin can do that for now.

[BenJeremy]

I think he's referring to the use of conditionals in skin elements.

All skin conditionals also have "not" equivalents; which ones are you looking to use, and for what effect?

[BenJeremy]

Well, the conditionals are "AND" only, but through clever usage of the NOT, you could simulate the OR operation.

[BenJeremy]

QUOTE (diffident @ Feb 15 2004, 12:53 PM)

QUOTE conditionals are "AND" only BJ, this doesn't mean I could use several conditionals for one element to get a logical AND does it? I mean like this: <LayoutElement Type="Image" Source="Whatever">    <Condition>ItemEntry</Condition>    <Condition Arg1="0">ItemSelected</Condition> </LayoutElement> (ie IF the currently selected item isn't a submenu AND it's the first item in the list THEN show this image) I've had a fairly thorough go at making this work, but I can only get the first conditional to have any effect (I'm testing using the WIP, so the <Condition Arg1="0">ItemSelected</Condition> does work on its own, or if I put it first). Have I misinterpreted what you meant?

I believe all conditionals need to pass in order for the item to be displayed.  It should work... but I haven't tested it much.

[diffident]

QUOTE (BenJeremy @ Feb 15 2004, 07:31 PM)

I believe all conditionals need to pass in order for the item to be displayed.  It should work... but I haven't tested it much.

I'll give it another go - that's what I thought you meant.