Just curious. But if Sony is Discussing exclusiveness with Square... wouldnt that mean that they are arranging exclusiveness?
Sony's problems with losing exclusives is because they arent communicating with the dev's. You see, in an interview with Jack Tretton (in my latest game informer), he states that Sony has never paid for an exclusive and that thedevs had always come to them. This round, Sony is pratically the last one out of the gate where next-gen is concerned and seeing as how the 360 has a larger install base, it only makes sense that 3rd parties wouldnt willingly make their game exclusive to a console that has a lower install base number. My point is, if they want exclusives, then they need to start paying for them and if they are "discussing" exclusiveness, then thats more than likely what theyre doing as im pretty sure, the exclusives lost thus far are due to them not communicating with the devs about exclusivity (I assume that they assumed that they would just be exclusive because of the name on the console [arrogance ftw!]).