QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
The different versions of the bible actually exhibit CONFLICT.
Conflict or contradict. Not to mention the pedigree of your sources. (just like your lead to gold BS)
I agree with you only a nutjob would argue the hidden meanings of religous parable. Congratulations.
QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
Here are some good textual criticisms of the passage
Textual CriticismSite dedicated to the topicThe problem IrishBastard is that you will not bother to read either of those....
Besides it seems more like you want me to quote directly from the bible...to dispute the bible?
Maybe...but my logical argument is thus.
The similarities between the passages you quote and what is currently happening in the middle east is vague at best. It relies on interpreting it in a certain way.
My example of this being done with an obviously false prophecy was Nostradmus.
No the problem is that I will not categorically endorse your misguided manifesto's.
Is this the official interpretation of the christian church, NOPE becuase they probably dont agree thats why there are so many splinter factions amongst christian church.
QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
I could make several other logical arguments about the nature of the book your quoting....but I doubt any of that would make it through your rather thick skull.
Really...and how exactly would i demonstrate knowledge?
I believe I remember trying to explain to some very stupid young men the difference between force and inertia.
Force is not an intrinsic property. Something does not "have" force, but rather exherts it.
I then remember one of those two idiots posting a page from NASA. The page contained several equations and contained the word inertia....
This particular idiot ignored the fact that the equations being used were all based around Force.
Now...I realized that...that idiot didnt.
So...who displays a complete ignorance of the subject matter with his inane googling and glancing over webpages?
BTW...physical science is fairly infantile?
Hmm...thats kinda funny...since I believe that everyone will agree that physical laws have existed since this reality was created.....yet your "christian bible" was only completed about 1500 years ago.
Ummm...what would my SPEAKING Aramaic have to do with my READING of Greek and Hebrew?
Do you believe that the bible was originally written in Aramaic?
That might be an interesting discussion
First off it was momentum not inertia that jha introduced to you. I thought ever college went through the rocket problem guess I was mistaken.
But the fact of the matter, you never posted any mathematical development of any object based upon a force diagrahm when asked to. You always changed the scope of question to match a googled example.
Neither you or Lordvader, could come to the correct answer on the rocket problem, not a very difficult problem at all. (yours and his answer
contradicted each others)
QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
BTW...physical science is fairly infantile?
Hmm...thats kinda funny...since I believe that everyone will agree that physical laws have existed since this reality was created.....yet your "christian bible" was only completed about 1500 years ago.
Ummm...what would my SPEAKING Aramaic have to do with my READING of Greek and Hebrew?
Do you believe that the bible was originally written in Aramaic?
That might be an interesting discussion
Second, modern (classical) physics (science), not there manisfistation, is only a few hundred years old. The old testament as I remember was written in Aramaic. Old testament events are several thousand years old, like exodus, pyramids and the like. You know there is an extensive world history prior to Paul and the gentiles/greeks discovery of the middle east.
(So you can understand gravity has always been here, our understanding of gravity is infantile)QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
Really...and how exactly would i demonstrate knowledge?
You demonstrate knowledge and understanding by being able to articulate and explain verbally and mathematically a concept.
QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
I believe I remember trying to explain to some very stupid young men the difference between force and inertia.
Force is not an intrinsic property. Something does not "have" force, but rather exherts it.
I then remember one of those two idiots posting a page from NASA. The page contained several equations and contained the word inertia....
This particular idiot ignored the fact that the equations being used were all based around Force.
Now...I realized that...that idiot didnt.
So...who displays a complete ignorance of the subject matter with his inane googling and glancing over webpages?
I dont believe that you still get it, you say you do but cant demonstrate understanding. I will ask you like jha did express the mathematical force balance equation for a rocket(moving at a constant velocity) that strikes a solid object.
Its alright if you go ask someone at school that really knows. QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
Force is not an intrinsic property. Something does not "have" force, but rather exherts it.
Back to semantics I see.
![blink.gif](style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 28 2006, 11:54 AM)
![View Post](http://forums.xboxscene.org/public/style_images/master/snapback.png)
The similarities between the passages you quote and what is currently happening in the middle east is vague at best. It relies on interpreting it in a certain way.
My example of this being done with an obviously false prophecy was Nostradmus.
The bible says tht the gentiles(remnants of the roman empire) will lay babylon(Iraq) to ruin. In very simplistic language, is this statement incorrect.
Or is it just one hell of a coincidence.
The only thing Nastradamus has said to be true is that there will be wars. WOW!!!!! I cant belieeve you even bring that fraud up in an intelligent conversation.