xboxscene.org forums

Author Topic: Samsung Hl-r5067w 50  (Read 113 times)

adeon

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
Samsung Hl-r5067w 50
« on: June 05, 2007, 01:32:00 PM »
Im thinking of buying this DLP-TV

its 949.00... which fits my pocket  tongue.gif


Samsung HL-R5067W 50

this one is even sweeter...  cost more bank.. but... I think I can handle it...

Samsung HLS-5679W 56" LED Engine 1080p DLP

what do you guys think??

If you think a even better brand.... or model.. etc.. is better.. let me know ... smile.gif


Logged

hamwbone

  • Recovered User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2121
Samsung Hl-r5067w 50
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2007, 01:44:00 PM »
i have the 50 in samsung standerd bulb, not led, and its pretty damn nice.  paid like 1600 for it before christmas, PUKE hehe. im not sure what amazons position in the sale is, butt he tv is from tiger direct. some people love tiger, some people hate tiger. read up on the company on shipping larger items before buying. as far as the tv goes though A++ hehe.
Logged

o The Drizzle o

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 489
Samsung Hl-r5067w 50
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2007, 07:30:00 PM »
my friend has the 56", its beautiful. like really nice...so id say go for the extra 6"
Logged

adeon

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
Samsung Hl-r5067w 50
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2007, 12:45:00 AM »
the 56 one seems to be worth the extra buck..

the 50 inch one will run me just about 400 less because I would have to pay for shipping...


and they say the LED ones give 20,000 life, as to just 2000 - 4000


... got my mind made up tongue.gif...


should I purchase an extended warrenty??...  do these break fast??..

or will I be pulling my hair later if I don't buy one...

it comes with 1 year.. and I can add another for 150.. or 3 for 279... (that being 4 years for the 279 )


that sums this sucker up close to 1800... ouch!
Logged