QUOTE(leo5150 @ Feb 20 2008, 12:43 AM)
The person who wrote the article is a ASSCLOWN the BLU-RAY group allready said they would welcome them with open arms
QUOTE(davinator456 @ Feb 20 2008, 02:28 AM)
This guy is a moron
100% Agreed. The article is complete dribble and author has the business accumen of a 2 year old.
Is this the same guy who has been quoted in front-page news before and who used to work for Microsoft 6 months before the launch of the 360 and regularly comes out with BS predictions and inside info not relevant and that can't be substantiated? Wouldn't surprise me if it is.
QUOTE
... "On to HD-DVD v Blu-ray. MS opposed Blu-ray because Sony supported it, plain and simple. I was in the room when the decision was made. But they hedged their bets by making the Media player a plug in. They could very quickly have a Blue Ray external plug in just like the HD, if Sony will cooperate."
I doubt this dude was in the room let alone the building where any real decision making was made. boardroom does not equal engineering water-cooler.
"We hate Sony so lets leave" is not a profit building methodology. "BR Consortium won't license HDi over Java from us" is.
QUOTE
"Therein lays the rub. MS, one of the worst co's to get info out of to make products compatible, needs Sony to help a competitor do just that - compete with a compatible product that depends on the competitor's intellectual protocol. Sony knows that they cannot justify charging MS a fee that is larger than any other customer. Sony wants to make Blu-Ray ubiquitous so they have shaved down fees as much as possible. So MS must get the same deal as everyone else."
Blah Blah fking Blah. Sony, Sony, Sony etc. SONY is ONE chaired member of the Consortium. This guy needs to grow up (and read my licensing comments above and below
) leo5150 has set the record straight ^^ as well.
QUOTE
"What would you do now if you were Sony? The same thing MS has done over the years. Make the technology intentionally incompatible, withhold information, withhold support for design input to make it compatible, etc."
Tin-foil hats ON!
QUOTE
"We'll see over the next few months. Either MS will come out with a Blu-ray player, or they will file suit to force Sony to share, in much the same way many others sue MS for the same reasons on Windows compatibility. It will be interesting to watch this unfold."
File suit LOL WTF for? they can license the product like everyone else. Hell, Toshiba may even join the Commitee once it returns to semiconductor work and from there it could even be elected to the board at some point. The only real requirements are working with the technology (and in it's semiconductor capacity Tosh could easily do this and develop BR componentry) and to pay the annual membership fee.
Meanwhile, microsoft will be left out in the cold a bit (in terms of what it is used to) but that is because their one hope of getting anything out of this dissappeared when Java was selected for implementing interactivity. They didn't have any patents to conrtib to the security side and aren't involved with the physical engineering so they weren't going to ever get royalties for the players without their software.
However, in that way, they were never /are no worse off thany any other major OEM wanting to build and sell BR stuff.