Gawd, re-reading what MS said over again makes me laugh at their choice of words.
" At this point we have no reason to believe that the claims made in the letter are based on factual data as opposed to being just an individual opinion."
Lets take a look at this.
" At this point we have no reason to believe that the claims made " <- ok, right off the bat, denial. They start to wave the BS flag and try to sound authoritative at that. ...lets continue.
"...claims made in the letter are based on factual data as opposed to being just an individual opinion." <- here MS draws the line. MS is telling the world that they make decisions based on fact rather than opinion. So, from this, I'm gathering that MS believes that individual opinions don't mean squat.
But lets take a look at these MS jabronies. Lets look at this scenarios. Theres a staff meeting at MS that involves a group of people and that group of people just happens to include a few people from the group that came up with the above announcement, not all of the people, but just a few. This is an idea meeting and guess who is attending, ole' Billy Boy and ole' Billy Boy has an opinion about something. What are the chances Billy Boy is not going to get what he wants? If I had billions of dollars you can rest assured I'm going to get what I want, my opinion. And whose going to stop me?
So now looking at MS and how they deal with opinions, if your the boss, its FACT! If your not, its FICTION. I think that says a lot about how MS actually views people outside the company, i.e. consumers, etc.
Ok, now I'm confused. Individual opinions don't mean squat. The boss's, an individual, opinion get rounds of applause. I don't get it. It appears that MS needs to make up their mind on where they stand on opinions. Because as it appears right now this "doesn't mean squat/does mean squat" just negates itself out and thats a contradiction. And we all know that a contradiction is pretty much a lie.
(IMG:
style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)