Post by: Xbox-Scene on December 04, 2009, 11:06:00 PM
Small Xbox 360 Motherboard Revision: GPU-revision, RF-Module Posted by XanTium | December 5 01:06 EST | News Category: Xbox360 |
| MODFREAKz posted pictures of an Xbox 360 (MFR Date 2009-09-20) with a somewhat updated motherboard revision. No huge changes, so it's probably still a Jasper. It seems to have a new GPU-revision (Kronos1), new RF-module and some small layout changes. CPU, HANA, southbridge, 16mb NAND, RAM are same. No heatsink changes either, MS stopped using the 2nd GPU heatsink/pipe a while ago already. The DVD drive is a Lite-On DG-16D2S 93450C-2. The CB/CD are of course JTAG-fixed as with any 360 made since ~mid-June. |
Post by: k12k08 on December 04, 2009, 11:16:00 PM
Post by: Mr.RedRing on December 04, 2009, 11:17:00 PM
Post by: vvk on December 04, 2009, 11:30:00 PM
QUOTE
The CB/CD are of course JTAG-fixed as with any 360 made since mid-June.
Did I buy a Jasper that can not be JTAG,my MFD is 15 july 2009 120g elit,the dashboard is exploitable 2.0.7363.0?Is this for certain?
Post by: XanTium on December 04, 2009, 11:54:00 PM
QUOTE(vvk @ Dec 5 2009, 07:30 AM) 
Did I buy a Jasper that can not be JTAG,my MFD is 15 july 2009 120g elit,the dashboard is exploitable 2.0.7363.0?Is this for certain?
What matters for the JTAG hack is the CB (and CD indirectly) version.
Now if you have an old Xbox 360 ... it's easy to know ... Microsoft updated and locked those to a non-exploitable version with the 849x update.
For "new" 360s it's a different story tho, Microsoft started using the fixed CB before they shipped them with 8498 onboard. So it's very possible to have a 7xxx kernel but with a fixed/locked CB already. From user reports we know MS started shipping with the fixed CB around mid June 2009. But that date might vary based on production plant and line.
Post by: jester on December 05, 2009, 12:06:00 AM
QUOTE(XanTium @ Dec 5 2009, 01:54 AM)
What matters for the JTAG hack is the CB (and CD indirectly) version.
Now if you have an old Xbox 360 ... it's easy to know ... Microsoft updated and locked those to a non-exploitable version with the 849x update.
For "new" 360s it's a different story tho, Microsoft started using the fixed CB before they shipped them with 8498 onboard. So it's very possible to have a 7xxx kernel but with a fixed/locked CB already. From user reports we know MS started shipping with the fixed CB around mid June 2009. But that date might vary based on production plant and line.
^ this.
Easiest way to find out is to wire up the LPT points and dump your NAND, open the image in 360 Flash Tool, and report back which CB you have.
Post by: vvk on December 05, 2009, 12:17:00 AM
This post has been edited by vvk: Dec 5 2009, 08:19 AM
Post by: m82a1 on December 05, 2009, 12:35:00 AM
This post has been edited by m82a1: Dec 5 2009, 08:39 AM
Post by: XanTium on December 05, 2009, 01:20:00 AM
QUOTE(m82a1 @ Dec 5 2009, 08:35 AM)
when you click the pics on the front page, they resort to 404's
fixed. thx.
Post by: jester on December 05, 2009, 01:55:00 AM
Post by: E-Vix on December 05, 2009, 04:32:00 AM
I've dumped the NAND, but I couldn't get Xell running because the CD/CB was already at version 6750, so JTAG was already disabled... DB was at 7363 originally but it was updated to 84xx or 85xx when I played H3:ODST.
The big difference in the RF module is that all components are moved to the back. Also there are is room for 2 connectors on the RF module itself, but the connectors aren't soldered on yet. Maybe MS will add some new features to those connectors in the future, or maybe they are just there for debugging.
Post by: Ranger72 on December 05, 2009, 08:38:00 AM
Post by: Zack_sparrow on December 05, 2009, 03:37:00 PM
have any port's postion been change?specific of nand
Post by: funky26cro on December 05, 2009, 07:19:00 PM
Post by: Br0k3R on December 07, 2009, 01:25:00 PM
QUOTE(funky26cro @ Dec 6 2009, 03:19 AM)
got assured 100% that drive was 83450c v1 and flashable by store
you mean 74850C (liteon v1)
83850c is liteon v2
Post by: Shoush991 on December 09, 2009, 06:43:00 AM
Post by: Thundercleese on December 11, 2009, 03:59:00 AM
QUOTE(Br0k3R @ Dec 7 2009, 09:25 PM) 
you mean 74850C (liteon v1)
83850c is liteon v2
No there is 74850C, 83850c v1, 83850c v2 , 9xxxxc.
Post by: under420dog on December 12, 2009, 08:10:00 PM
nothing changed but the flux they were using...the older stuff caused residue
on and in the balls there self..so when the chip heated up...the solderballs tried to push out the bad residue
causing an incomplete connection...
Post by: under420dog on December 13, 2009, 03:36:00 AM
Post by: Martinchris23 on December 16, 2009, 01:57:00 AM