QUOTE(scuba156 @ Mar 19 2008, 10:36 PM)

no that will not happen, the SDK is already available to people (im not going to name anyone and it may cause them being harrased for it), BUT it will NOT be used for any public releases of xbox 360 homebrew
and i wasnt talking about these people having the ability to run unsigned code of a devkit either....
if they did make public releases of homebrew built with an XeXDK, then it opens them up to lawsuits and obviously they dont fancy being sued
Don't you remember what happened to xbox 1,and yes it will happen to the retail 360 if it gets fully hacked.
Thats why you haven't seen any public homebrew.I've been in the 360 dev scene for a couple of years now,but the retail 360 is far from running unsigned code.For right now if people want a modded 360 than there best bet is to get a 360 dev/debug kit,that kit works wonders.
QUOTE(scuba156 @ Mar 21 2008, 12:53 PM)

while MS has been trying to keep the lid on this jar airtight as you said, 90% of the time, there is always some way to get around it (not that i want it to be leaked though), the question is if someone will be able to find that way and then actually start sharing it.
i can understand them having tight security for the SDK, but i could imagine them leaving a hole somewhere in the consoles security. they cannot deny that with the xbox being fully hacked, it brought them alot more sales. they are a business after all and in the end, all businesses are in it for the money, but they do have to protect the interests of investors and developers too
Wasn't it true that MS actually LOST money on every XBox1 sold? It was basically a PC for far less than what a simlarly powered PC would have cost at the time. I believe their business model was to make money by selling software, licenses, accessories, etc, NOT by selling the console itself. So selling a fully hackable console didn't make much business sense. Even if the whole world had bought Xbox1, MS would still only be able to break even (if that).
This post has been edited by satviewer2000: Mar 26 2008, 07:08 AM