Post by: chad000 on January 03, 2012, 03:01:00 PM
Post by: Snowy87 on January 03, 2012, 03:43:00 PM
Next..
Post by: feidhlim1986 on January 03, 2012, 03:48:00 PM
QUOTE(Snowy87 @ Jan 3 2012, 11:43 PM) 
Always so late on news.
Next..
Always so late on trying to be cool...
Next...
Post by: Rammieone on January 03, 2012, 04:18:00 PM
Post by: Syn201 on January 03, 2012, 05:43:00 PM
QUOTE(Snowy87 @ Jan 3 2012, 11:43 PM)
Always so late on news.
Next..
At least they put the news out dick head,what have YOU done for the scene again exactly?.
If you knew how the scene worked you would know why stuff is sometimes late .btw you get this stuff for free and do not even give one word of thank .
OT-thanks to all involved great work as always ..
Post by: elderzeus on January 03, 2012, 06:04:00 PM
Post by: Zod5000 on January 03, 2012, 06:53:00 PM
Post by: teagster on January 03, 2012, 07:18:00 PM
Post by: Sneaky360 on January 03, 2012, 08:19:00 PM
Post by: naser076 on January 03, 2012, 09:55:00 PM
Post by: SZaiaku on January 03, 2012, 10:11:00 PM
Post by: LikeyLicky on January 04, 2012, 12:43:00 AM
Just cant thank you enough. Especially for working on this over the holiday period instead of spending more time with the family
Post by: pinkerton on January 04, 2012, 03:00:00 AM
Post by: The Dude Z on January 04, 2012, 04:07:00 AM
QUOTE(CaptainStu @ Jan 4 2012, 06:36 AM)
WOO! Thanks folks!
I assume this means you don't need to patch anything through XBC now as ABGX should do it instead?
Correct , This checks then patches the Topology Data so no need to inject it with XBC any longer.
Post by: richman33 on January 04, 2012, 04:36:00 AM
QUOTE(ZakMcRofl @ Jan 4 2012, 02:01 AM)
This could have easily been fixed by hex editing the binary (assuming the source code is not available). It is just confusing people and there is no reason not to adjust the GUI revision, even when there are no changes.
If this is something that confuses you or anyone else for that matter then you should just toss your Pc out the window cause that new fangled mouse thingy is just way to hard to explain!
Post by: Mik3h on January 04, 2012, 04:39:00 AM
Post by: evil-dereck on January 04, 2012, 04:55:00 AM
Post by: sminitis on January 04, 2012, 05:52:00 AM
Post by: pif001 on January 04, 2012, 06:02:00 AM
QUOTE(evil-dereck @ Jan 4 2012, 12:55 PM)
Should I be worried that my XBC rips aren't getting the thumbs up in ABGX?
I don't think the answer to your inquiry is that hard....
Post by: evil-dereck on January 04, 2012, 06:05:00 AM
QUOTE(pif001 @ Jan 4 2012, 07:02 AM)
I don't think the answer to your inquiry is that hard....
I'm not worried about a yellow DMI here and there, I'm just befuddled as to why two different rips of the same original pass Video CRC as ISOs yet fail as DVDs
Update: A third copy, ISO ran through ABGX first, also passed ABGX as a DVD unlike the other two. Could my boxes possibly be safe since they only had the "vid crc not match" disc in them a couple times for one day?
Post by: Oldxbox on January 04, 2012, 06:53:00 AM
Post by: prozac4312 on January 04, 2012, 07:09:00 AM
QUOTE(pinkerton @ Jan 4 2012, 05:00 AM)
Does this version update automatically to SSV2 as standard now?
SSv2 is the standard for games ripped with 0800 firmware...that said, since XGD3 games must be ripped using 0800, they could only be SSv2.
Post by: mouseym on January 04, 2012, 07:24:00 AM
QUOTE(ZakMcRofl @ Jan 4 2012, 01:01 AM)
This could have easily been fixed by hex editing the binary (assuming the source code is not available). It is just confusing people and there is no reason not to adjust the GUI revision, even when there are no changes.
If your autism is stopping you from using abgx360 just because the GUI revision number hasn't changed then you need to go back to your doctor.
Post by: defhead on January 04, 2012, 07:40:00 AM
QUOTE(Snowy87 @ Jan 4 2012, 09:43 AM)
Always so late on news.
Next..
Next..
Post by: Angel_Azrael on January 04, 2012, 09:21:00 AM
QUOTE(ZakMcRofl @ Jan 3 2012, 09:01 PM)
This could have easily been fixed by hex editing the binary (assuming the source code is not available). It is just confusing people and there is no reason not to adjust the GUI revision, even when there are no changes.
abgx360 has always been a command-line program that now is v1.0.6. The Graphical User Interface (GUI) that helps you use this program is still v1.0.2 because there's nothing new in it and has nothing to do with the main program. Is this so hard for you to understand?
Post by: josh256 on January 04, 2012, 12:32:00 PM
Tested this on a backup w/o topology data and it failed (writes disabled).
Tested this on a backup w/o topology data, auto-fixed/patched and passed (writes enabled).
Ran an MD5 on the XBC-patched vs. ABGX 1.0.6-patched and the hash was identical.
Very sweet
Post by: tomgreen99200 on January 04, 2012, 12:53:00 PM
edit: Patches topology data automatically just fine. Just like before, set it to Level 3.
Post by: nightmareZz on January 04, 2012, 01:36:00 PM
Post by: naser076 on January 04, 2012, 05:11:00 PM
Post by: Spark on January 04, 2012, 06:42:00 PM
Just to add that if your burned DVD's are failing to verify through this then try scanning them using the iHAS iXtreme burner and not a different DVD drive, since for one the slim DVD burner in my laptop seems incapable of reading these discs properly, reporting an incorrect layerbreak and video partition size but through the iHAS drive everything works perfectly.
Post by: Zod5000 on January 04, 2012, 06:44:00 PM
QUOTE(naser076 @ Jan 4 2012, 06:11 PM)
so no more imgburn ? am all confused i patched game with abgx (COD3) layer break 2133520 can i copy it don't wanna watse a dvd thanks. same thing for nhl12 as well wih abgx i have ixtreme 3.0 loaded
ummm if you want to use your patched iso, you'll beed to burn it to use it? in which case you need imgburn to burn it?
Post by: tek522 on January 04, 2012, 07:05:00 PM
"Game partition CRC does not match the verified ini!"
The stealth check passes though. I checked abgx.net like it says too, but looking up the game database isn't a solution. Do we just wait for new rips?
Post by: fayd on January 04, 2012, 08:49:00 PM
Thanks Xecuter Admin..
abgx360 setup
Post by: fayd on January 04, 2012, 09:10:00 PM
Post by: xboxdawg on January 04, 2012, 11:39:00 PM
Post by: ajindaouse on January 05, 2012, 03:00:00 AM
Post by: tomgreen99200 on January 05, 2012, 12:50:00 PM
QUOTE(fayd @ Jan 4 2012, 04:59 PM)
Is there any recommended settings we should use?
Like i said, set it to Level 3 and it will take care of the rest.
Post by: DARKFiB3R on January 05, 2012, 04:02:00 PM
Still, awesome release, thank you
Post by: danthaman673 on January 06, 2012, 11:34:00 AM
QUOTE(ZakMcRofl @ Jan 4 2012, 10:31 AM)
This could have easily been fixed by hex editing the binary (assuming the source code is not available). It is just confusing people and there is no reason not to adjust the GUI revision, even when there are no changes.
I'm inclined to agree(except about the GUI revision changes.. I think ? 'No reason not to adjust if there is no changes'?.. sorry but that statement gave me a brain-sprain ;-) , the GUI is the front-end that drives the new CLI, it should be updated to support the various features (such as drive speed) and reflect as such,(yes I know you can add switches in that box if u want to but..)
They release the source (AFAIK) so ppl can do it themsleves, If anyone is keen to have a go and wants some support then pls start a new thread and post the link here(and I will do what I can to help)
As I would be keen to see some more features integrated into the GUI such as enable/disabale Topo patching and autofix levels based on topo deviation... Topo bounds testing etc..Topo SHA-1 matching also for quick mode? And the list goes on.. But just getting started on the GUI I'm sure would be a big help to those who work hard to put-out the CLI, If anyone has been working on topo analysis APP (betting it would be CLI also) perhaps could be integrated into the GUI's scripting perhaps?
QUOTE(evil-dereck @ Jan 4 2012, 10:35 PM)
I'm not worried about a yellow DMI here and there, I'm just befuddled as to why two different rips of the same original pass Video CRC as ISOs yet fail as DVDs
Update: A third copy, ISO ran through ABGX first, also passed ABGX as a DVD unlike the other two. Could my boxes possibly be safe since they only had the "vid crc not match" disc in them a couple times for one day?
Interesting, I'm inclined to say you have one of the usual issues with ripping, Your box should be fine unless it's some sort of new flagging system.. not likely though, we're a bit past deliberate CRC errors as AP (I would think...)
QUOTE
DARKFiB3R Posted Yesterday, 08:32 AM
Shame it still doesn't automatically choose ssv2 over ssv1 for xgd2 games
Still, awesome release, thank you
Shame it still doesn't automatically choose ssv2 over ssv1 for xgd2 games
Still, awesome release, thank you
Agreed, I thought there was a checkbox for it somewhere... But it's been a while since I've had use for it..
I would mostly like to use it to integrate my AP2.5 sectors, Or maybe for checking for CRC errors... Plus it's nice to know how my local rips compare to the 'median' files.. (I still find it hard to believe they did several rips of my local region's titles for the median files, if u get my drift, that might be fine today... But I really want the piece of mind that comes from doing it yourself... wherever possible) In the old days, aftr I checked CRC's I didn't mind a few yellow miss-matches that I knew were due to regional (etc..) differences I have yet to have an issue (AFIK) with a topo I've done myself (Mind,you I'm carefull about the drive I'm using, how it's used , power-source, stability, not bumping it, etc.. Most ppl I guess wouldn't be able to do all that...)
EDIT: MY speed-reading sux, but on the second pass-thru I noticed it mentions that 'a new GUI is in the works' If anyone knows any of the switches to measure topo data pls let me/us know
I'm still up fer helping-out with the GUI BTW
Post by: cedarpoint2 on January 07, 2012, 02:39:00 AM
I have just tried mine, Secdata is clean. Put one letter in the wrong place and I get a Secdata decrytion error. Tried again with the correct code, Secdata is clean again.
Cant answer the whole corrupted profile thing though.
Post by: danthaman673 on January 07, 2012, 08:39:00 AM
QUOTE(stikboy @ Jan 7 2012, 07:46 AM)
well
I ran an image of need for speed the run through the new agbx and at first i got a message in red saying there was 12 sectors of topology data missing which it then proceeded to patch succesfully. DMI passed and CRC passed and it all looked good.
burnt the disc and installed it to my offline xbox went to play it and got a message saying it was an unsuported disc.
i then switched the xbox off and moved my usb stick (with my profile on it) to my jtag booted it up and it didn't pick up the profile, checked on my stick and my profile was there but it's now corrupted.
i ran the console serial and xvalue from xval and got a message saying secdata decrytion error.
oh dear
looks like you can be get your console banned offline now.
What did you burn it with?? IHAS on Overburn?? Also when did you last check your Xval??
I have noticed some odd behaviour which leads me to believe some sort of silent update has been slithered-out in the last day or so as my test machine is now telling me that previously perfect backups are now coming-up unreadable (Of course I am well aware it could be a lot of things that have nothing to do with XBAP) I make mention of this incase anyone else is experiencing the same or similar to get on to it quickly, Now I will check the drive and other things for means of causing this error on a disc with an immaculate surface that was working fine yesterday and the day before..
It would be nice if we had a way of generating our own topo's (for those of us with good reason and the patience to do so..)
QUOTE(cedarpoint2 @ Jan 7 2012, 07:09 PM)
Secdata decrytion error does not mean your console is flagged or banned, it simply means you typed the codes wrong (at least that's all it used to mean). Are you typing dashes as well? Is the uppercase/lowercase correct?
I have just tried mine, Secdata is clean. Put one letter in the wrong place and I get a Secdata decrytion error. Tried again with the correct code, Secdata is clean again.
Cant answer the whole corrupted profile thing though.
Oh yeah: AFAIK the way Xval is done, keying-in a digit wrong will produce a result that doesn't indicate a security failing/flagging. Pretty sure it's some type of one-way hash, so miss-keying will just give u an error (from memory)
Post by: danthaman673 on January 07, 2012, 11:54:00 AM
QUOTE(cedarpoint2 @ Jan 8 2012, 02:15 AM)
It does give you an error, a Secdata decrytion error. If I put the 5 and 3 back to front in the first part of the x-value code, I get the error. If I put them back the right way, Secdata is clean
You mean error as opposed to AP 2.5 CHALLENGE FAILED or some such (Was the point I was driving at) Not that it would be a stretch for there to somehow be some new security failure codes not yet covered by the Xval app....
Turns-out the 'unreadable' issue was due to a crappy WD HDD corrupting the installed version, causing some sort of miss-comparison .. funny how that seems to happen to ppl a lot since XGD3...?
Post by: Svantesson666 on January 07, 2012, 04:31:00 PM
Cause if you check the burned DVD through abgx360 it will spot any errors, right?
Post by: not2able on January 08, 2012, 07:22:00 AM
Thanks for this update to ABGX
Post by: iLLiac4 on January 08, 2012, 07:57:00 AM
I'm asking this because if I untick option to adjust angle settings everything is ok for some older games but if i tick 359 angle then it says, that it should be repaired (with 1.06 version).
In .nfo it says that the option 359 is arhaic and not relevant anymore.
TNX
Post by: franb1 on January 08, 2012, 10:26:00 AM
QUOTE(not2able @ Jan 8 2012, 02:22 PM)
No errors here whatsoever, burned using iHas124, used ABGX to patch topology to skyrim, need for speed hot pursuit PAL and forza 4..All work perfect. All games install to HD 100%.
Thanks for this update to ABGX
Yes Ok but has anyone got theses to work ???
Just Dance 3
Logo HP
NBA 2K12
Saints Row 3
Warhammer
NFS the Run
All PAL
Post by: not2able on January 08, 2012, 12:04:00 PM
QUOTE(franb1 @ Jan 8 2012, 06:26 PM)
Yes Ok but has anyone got theses to work ???
Just Dance 3
Logo HP
NBA 2K12
Saints Row 3
Warhammer
NFS the Run
All PAL
Saints row 3 yes...NBA 2K11 I will find out later.
Imgburn settings: Force HT: No, Online HT: No, OverSpeed: No, SmartBurn: Yes speed: 2.4 x Media: mkm 003
Post by: stikboy on January 08, 2012, 02:59:00 PM
QUOTE(cedarpoint2 @ Jan 7 2012, 10:39 AM)
Secdata decrytion error does not mean your console is flagged or banned, it simply means you typed the codes wrong (at least that's all it used to mean). Are you typing dashes as well? Is the uppercase/lowercase correct?
I have just tried mine, Secdata is clean. Put one letter in the wrong place and I get a Secdata decrytion error. Tried again with the correct code, Secdata is clean again.
Cant answer the whole corrupted profile thing though.
i last used xval when i tried installing a backup of sonic generations to my xbox hdd and it failed halfway through installation. xval came back clean, i check it every month or so so i know how to use it.
burning my games with a flashed dvd burner, this is the one and only game i've ran through the new agbx so i think it might have something to do with the topology data it patched the game with.
i reckon my offline box is definetly banned now, why else would my profile suddenly be corrupted?
Post by: Zod5000 on January 08, 2012, 07:17:00 PM
QUOTE(iLLiac4 @ Jan 8 2012, 08:57 AM)
One question. If you are on LT v3.0 is it safe to play older games with 359 angle error?
I'm asking this because if I untick option to adjust angle settings everything is ok for some older games but if i tick 359 angle then it says, that it should be repaired (with 1.06 version).
In .nfo it says that the option 359 is arhaic and not relevant anymore.
TNX
the angle thing only happens on ssv1 right? and ssv1 isn't 100% secure. I'd patch to ssv2 and reburn.
Post by: stikboy on January 09, 2012, 03:20:00 PM
i would suggest no one uses agbx to patch their disc images until they've updated their firmware.
ah well you live and learn
Post by: sminitis on January 11, 2012, 06:57:00 AM
Post by: Rammieone on January 11, 2012, 07:32:00 AM
QUOTE(sminitis @ Jan 11 2012, 01:57 PM)
i read my copy of black ops with my ihas burner.then run the iso through abgx 1.06 and i got the following message at the end:failed to open or find Video_E2FA3A26.iso no such file or directory.this is a very large video partition that isnt hosted on the database,so you will have to find it elsewhere and put it in your stealthfiles folder.Autofix failed,stealth is still unverified.i burned the iso and the game is now working.but why am i gettin this error message?
Its a reminder to add the Video files which you can also get over at ABGX and unzip them into the stealthfiles folder for the database to use.
Post by: sminitis on January 11, 2012, 05:42:00 PM
QUOTE(Rammieone @ Jan 12 2012, 01:32 AM)
Its a reminder to add the Video files which you can also get over at ABGX and unzip them into the stealthfiles folder for the database to use.
i did it and worked.autofix was successful.thank you