You can buy a budget wired controller as well for Xbox 360. Most likely 360 games will only support 360 peripherals, so the old controllers would only work with Xbox games.
QUOTE
because it saves money for the people not quite as rich as you. Also the guide button only needs to be on ONE controller, and thats the one that is in the "first slot"
I am by no means rich! I live in a thrid world country where paying for a game is almost like a months salary. Im not rich, i am just not cheap! Every system in the history of time you had to buy new controllers when you got it. So why should MS lose more money to facilitate cheap bastards (not pointing any fingers)
QUOTE
word, that was a rather ignorant statement (ignorant as in uninformed). I think I could spend $30 bucks elsewhere... and if you have 4 controllers that's 120 to spend elsewheres... that's like 3 games... btw, the PS2 refinded their controllers too all the buttons became analog (execpt start and pause) yet they still didn't shove it up our arse for 120 in new controllers and accesories... btw, it's not just controllers some people have spent quite a bit of money on steering wheels and dance pads and all sorts of things that would be nice if it all came over cleanly. I'm willing to bet some people have 200-300 in accessories they would like to be able to bring to the new system. Unless you are volunteering to donate money to use that don't have it to blow on all new accessories.
...........really................ignorant........
......uninformed.........
...............cute
...........listen, where im from a game costs $5000 atleast, while a controller is like three thousand. I make 7000 a week, and i have bills; shit, my phone bill alone is like $10000 a month. i own 6 controllers and quite a few games. How can I afford all of this? Aggressive saving which means you should spend your money wisely, if you dont feel its worth it to get 4 more controllers well dont buy it! I spend thousands of dollars on gaming alone and im proud of it. The money is going to something I love. I wouldnt mind paying for new controllers cause you cant get what you want in life for free. Worrying about having to pay 120 bux ( which is $2400 TO ME) for a few controllers is just cheap from my point of view.
Like I said ignorant isn't meant to be an insult... everyone should look up the definition it isn't such a deragotory comment like it has been used in the past...
Anyway, that's fine and dandy if you enjoy working to spend money (give to MS) on games.... I myself am more interested in building a house right now so buying new controllers is not high on the list so it would be better if there were BC to old controllers... btw, old systems had like 2 ports and they also almost all came with two controllers.. now we have 4 ports and we are lucky we get one controller it seems.
it was stated above MS is loosing money on these consoles so it's obvious why they are doing this... and that is what is fustrating it's not a technical issue it's a greed issue... that I have a problem with.
I was not offended by that statement, I knew it wasnt MEANT to be an insult but it did cause im not in the rich departement at all. You cant possibly gauge my knowledge on any subject, you dont even know me, thats the point of what i said. Also this is an issue of cost vs. value. In my case i think the value and cost is a good balance. While in your case you dont feel the value is worth the cost (or am I wrong?). If thats the case then dont whine about it. you can't afford (by afford, i mean 'willing to spend' ) it do with out. Technically I cant afford it, but im willing to save and spend because i think the experience of multiplayer gaming is worth it. Expecting MS to lose more money because you need to 'build a house' is ridiculous. MS is a business and they cut alot of corners just to get the system this cheap, so you can even afford it. Im not gonna whine about controllers when im getting such a great deal on such a powerful console.
by the way, my dreamcast, genesis, snes and ps1 all came with ONE controller.
Trust, MS didn't do ANYTHING to make it affordable for me or anyone... they made it so it would be profitable for them.... you said it yourself they are a corporation out to make money... Like Noam Chomsky says there is no such thing as a "greedy corporation" they are all greedy that is the nature of the business. I don't forfeit the right to think that it isn't right what they do. No one is saying this is the worst thing ever we are just calling out how tasteless it is. Sony was the only serious console when PS2 was put out yet they didn't pull crap like this when they could have EASILY gotten away with it.
QUOTE(Bogus8 @ Jul 12 2005, 12:12 AM)
Trust, MS didn't do ANYTHING to make it affordable for me or anyone... they made it so it would be profitable for them.... you said it yourself they are a corporation out to make money... Like Noam Chomsky says there is no such thing as a "greedy corporation" they are all greedy that is the nature of the business. I don't forfeit the right to think that it isn't right what they do. No one is saying this is the worst thing ever we are just calling out how tasteless it is. Sony was the only serious console when PS2 was put out yet they didn't pull crap like this when they could have EASILY gotten away with it.
QUOTE
Sony was the only serious console when PS2 was put out yet they didn't pull crap like this when they could have EASILY gotten away with it.
You mean like forcing you to buy a multitap AND three more controllers if you want to play multiplayer?
you cant be serious........
your right about the MS point though, they did make it more profitable for them. But compare that to what sony is charging......
im not saying ms doesnt have their own ulterior motives but im a consumer, what the hell does it matter to me what their motives are? as long as i know what MY motives are (buy an affordable system and buy whatever accessories is needed to make my experience worth it).
what do you say to a business man that is trying to make his product more affordable and attractive to the consumer for whatever reason, (compared to the competition) without having to break his own back?
A.make it cheaper?
B.where do i sign up?
honestly I don't play nor do I know many people that play more than 2 controllers multiplayer so the PS2's two controllers were about right... btw, you can't have your cake and eat it ... you say every other system we had to buy new controllers so we shouldn't whine... but every other system also only had 2 ports and a need for a multi-tap to play more. GC and xbox were the first to really push 4 ports standard. I'm assuming sony will step up to the plate and match the competition now that the standard has been raised.... similar to BC of controllers I feel as I think others feel that is now the standard unless you revolutionize the controllers *shrug*
btw, you should always question the other guys motives, if you are just a mindless consumer you will buy ever horrible "As Seen On TV" product and very much in debt like all of us americans... that is why we have such a debt problem in this country, we are all mindless consumers that don't think or question they just buy buy BUY!
granted I don't trust MS... the way I look at it is what reason does MS have in dumping so much time and money into something like IE7 and give it away... why not allow someone like firefox to come in and say "hey we'll give it to you to include in windows" MS scares me when I see them dumping so much time and effort into a product that will not raise their profits directly... makes you wonder what's in the background of these products or what other angle are they approaching.... ok enough conspiracy theory crap
Peace
QUOTE(Bogus8 @ Jul 12 2005, 02:13 PM)
GC and xbox were the first to really push 4 ports standard.
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 12 2005, 12:23 PM)
Sure, if you're 8 years old...
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 12 2005, 01:23 PM)