Post by: kendrid on October 04, 2005, 09:24:00 PM
Here.
This kind of sucks depending upon how far off they look and if the framerate is an issue.
QUOTE
Advanced Warfighter doesn't look quite as good as that superb trailer released back when the game was announced, but it doesn't look too far from that footage, either. Imagine the same style of gameplay and the same effects, but in lower res and with a less consistent frame rate. More importantly, it seems the gameplay featured in the trailer is intact, and that should please fans of the series as much as any graphical upgrade
Post by: Deftech on October 04, 2005, 09:33:00 PM
Its in this vid...
http://www.xboxyde.c...ws_2085_en.html
but anyways...look at this...
QUOTE
Advanced Warfighter doesn't look quite as good as that superb trailer released back when the game was announced, but it doesn't look too far from that footage, either. Imagine the same style of gameplay and the same effects, but in lower res and with a less consistent frame rate. More importantly, it seems the gameplay featured in the trailer is intact, and that should please fans of the series as much as any graphical upgrade. We'll bring you more on Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter in the weeks leading up to its release.
LOL I'll take any game that doesnt look too far from that trailer that was released at E3. I love how graphics have come so far that they nitpick when its not 100% of a scripted trailer
They even use the word Superb, and say it comes close to that 
Post by: Deftech on October 04, 2005, 11:15:00 PM
I have made a decision though. Im not getting Oblivion and a few games. Its either a few games, play those for a few weeks, then get Oblivion. Or ONLY get Oblivion, play that for several weeks, and when I feel I need to move on, get the other ones. They cant all be in the house together or the temptation will prevail.
Id be happy with just CoD 2 for a few weeks
*sigh*
too many great games headed our way for our own good
Post by: corkinator on October 05, 2005, 12:49:00 AM
QUOTE
Imagine the same thing as the trailer with a lower framerate and lower resolution basically
Meh. Now I'm glad we don't get our 360's here till next year. Barely any reason to buy one now anyway.
Post by: Heet on October 05, 2005, 12:56:00 AM
Post by: KAGE360 on October 05, 2005, 07:48:00 AM
has this game been confirmed for a launch title? if not then maybe their waiting for the last minute to add high res textures and overal performance like bizarre did with PGR3.
ill wait till the game is in my hands before i make any judgement because the vid from E3 didnt look like anything the 360 couldnt do standing on its head.
Post by: SickJoda on October 05, 2005, 07:58:00 AM
Post by: SickJoda on October 05, 2005, 08:03:00 AM
Post by: incognegro on October 05, 2005, 08:06:00 AM
Post by: hugoboss1 on October 05, 2005, 08:42:00 AM
Xbox 360: MS Explains Lack-of-Games At X05
October 5th, 2005
According to director of platform marketing David Reid, the reason MS did not announce a concrete list of launch titles during last nights main address is that they are currently in the final stages of certification.
Speaking in the boozy aftermath of the main X05 address, Reid told US website GameSpot, there will be 15 to 20 Xbox 360 titles available on launch day, followed by half a dozen or so more by the end of the year. Along with its first-party titles and EAs launch prospects, others will be confirmed in the coming weeks.
While EA beat everyone to announcing what its launch titles would be for the new Xbox 360 console, MS has followed the lead and announced the 18 titles from various publishers that will be available for the new console from day one.
Source: Gamerlounge.com
Post by: MrGone2001 on October 05, 2005, 09:04:00 AM
Post by: Deftech on October 05, 2005, 09:46:00 AM
Post by: miggidy on October 05, 2005, 09:57:00 AM
Post by: Deftech on October 05, 2005, 10:07:00 AM
People are complaining about that?! it looks great!
any Recon fan will drool while imagining actually playing that!
good grief I cant wait!
are there more? I only got the one. Thanks for the heads up. Im just now checking all the newly posted shit so Im lagging behind in that dept.
Post by: Deftech on October 05, 2005, 12:31:00 PM
QUOTE
The game ran at a rough 60 FPS, but the slow movement and collision detection on many obstacles slowed down the game's feel, and if you add the regular, methodical pace of Ghost Recon in there in this 60% compete build, and it all adds up. Don't get me wrong, the game is indeed fun. The game we played was neither anti-aliased nor was it optimized. So, come launch and it should look spanking good.
Post by: deadpool66 on October 05, 2005, 04:22:00 PM
The build at x05 is only 60% complete hence this is why graphics are off from trailers also preview said game ran at 60fps.
http://xbox360.ign.c...5/655875p1.html
Post by: hugoboss1 on October 06, 2005, 08:47:00 AM
Publisher: Ubisoft
Developer: Ubisoft
Genre: Shooter
Release Date: 12/01/05