xboxscene.org forums

Xbox360 Forums => P => Xbox 360 Specific Game Chat (wip) => Xbox360 Game Forums => Project Gotham Racing® 3 => Topic started by: Lerxst on January 10, 2006, 09:16:00 PM

Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Lerxst on January 10, 2006, 09:16:00 PM
That's cool  cool.gif
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Master X on January 10, 2006, 09:17:00 PM
Holy, I never noticed that but those arent in game.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: IcedTea997 on January 10, 2006, 09:17:00 PM
Holy hell  which is the top and which is the bottom....




 blink.gif  love.gif
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Lerxst on January 10, 2006, 09:20:00 PM
Looks like top is real...
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Joergen on January 10, 2006, 09:21:00 PM
Yes they are ingame. Just go to photo mode and look at them yourself. It's just that people have no idea and no respect for the hard work of the artists when they drive past 200mph and bitch about jaggies.

Just imagine what they can do with the 512MB of ram on future titles. Think of a GTA game (or shenmue style rpg) modeled exactly like a city and access to many buildings, with photographic realism like PGR3.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: tonloc79 on January 10, 2006, 09:25:00 PM
To all the people ive seen posting threads and crying about the graphics in PGR3 being "CRAP"! YOUR ALL RETARDS! Pics are amazing! love.gif
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: xcallmeachieverx on January 10, 2006, 09:35:00 PM
WOW!

I think I really want to play this game now. That is very impressive. I seriously can't wait to see what future titles will bring...
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: zikronix on January 10, 2006, 09:58:00 PM
i will give you that it is impressive but...doesnt matter how great the graphics are the game play still sucks imho thats why i returned that pos
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: CattyKid on January 10, 2006, 10:02:00 PM
The top pics "real ones" look fake, but I know they aren't.
It would be nice to go to Tokyo sometime.  It's a lot more colorful than Times Square here (which I love and am amazed by).
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: KingOne on January 10, 2006, 10:02:00 PM
Its Amazing how they make it look awesome.

Top = Real
Bottom = PGR3

Overall = Looks Awesome without a few add ons.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Marrvia on January 10, 2006, 10:12:00 PM
Too bad the game doesn't look that good when you are actually playing it.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Xombe on January 10, 2006, 10:38:00 PM
Heh, the first one is approaching on the red-light district, the extreme east side of Shinjuku.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Zero_Cool on January 11, 2006, 02:08:00 AM
im sorry, is it just me, or does that first link take you to a chick lying on a bed? whatever, other than that looks great!
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Chancer on January 11, 2006, 02:43:00 AM
Where in the game is the first pic link of the 2 girls in bed then? Or is that not supposed to be there.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: lowendfrequency on January 11, 2006, 06:50:00 AM
Girls in panties?  *runs off to buy PGR3*


Seriously though, the amount of work that went into modeling the backgrounds is apparent, but still wasted IMO.  This is next gen, and if I see a goddamn jaggie I get pissed, regardless of how nice the backgrounds look as they fly by in a blur.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: alsybub on January 11, 2006, 08:05:00 AM
Looks incredible. Although I already knew it does. For those people that say it looks bad when playing it do you play on inside view or outside? Don't forget that PGR3 has been designed to be played from inside view even if you don't usually play that way. You find that you drive as if you are in a car rather than like it's a game. Also on the inside view all of the extra filters are applied including the reaction of the eye to light and so it looks amazing. Shame on those that think NFS:MW is impressive.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Joergen on January 11, 2006, 08:16:00 AM
Having fiddled with the VGA cable yesterday I got a clearer picture of what the image looks like and truly at 1280x720 (garage) and 1024x600 (ingame) it could use a smidgen more of AA, but at standard resolution its downscaled from 1024x600 to 640x480 and uses MEGA AA, reminescent of supersampling (which it is). At SD any jaggie you see is just because it isnt blurred entirely to hell like past gen games, but actually has some sharpness left to it.

But games like FNR3 demo seemed to have excellent AA despite the resolution. And that is the future for 360 when the devs get a grip of the 10MB EDRAM tiling.

edit: and whos the idiot who changed the night picture into some girls on a bed!!
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: deacon187 on January 15, 2006, 12:45:00 AM
atleast you all got to see a girl in panies on a bed all i get is a blank page with no not found error or anything, just a plain blank page
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Kernal69er on January 15, 2006, 08:19:00 AM
QUOTE(alsybub @ Jan 11 2006, 10:12 AM) View Post

Looks incredible. Although I already knew it does. For those people that say it looks bad when playing it do you play on inside view or outside? Don't forget that PGR3 has been designed to be played from inside view even if you don't usually play that way. You find that you drive as if you are in a car rather than like it's a game. Also on the inside view all of the extra filters are applied including the reaction of the eye to light and so it looks amazing. Shame on those that think NFS:MW is impressive.

I agree with you NFS is more impressive

I like looking at the car models and you can't deney NFS MW has better looking car models than PGR3's carttony cars. but yes PGR3 has solid scenery
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: twistedsymphony on January 15, 2006, 01:16:00 PM
QUOTE(Kernal69er @ Jan 15 2006, 10:26 AM) View Post

I agree with you NFS is more impressive

I like looking at the car models and you can't deney NFS MW has better looking car models than PGR3's carttony cars. but yes PGR3 has solid scenery

exactly how are PGR3's cars "cartoony"?

PGR3:
http://xbox360media....20092554383.jpg

Real Life:
http://www.atspeedim...ngine_cover.jpg

I don't know what kind of animation you've been watching...
The graphical style of NFSMW is a knock-off of a Fast and the Furious movie, the graphical style of PGR3 is a knock-off of a race broadcast.

The only time I would consider PGR3 graphics to be cartoony is the pre-release screenshots of incomplete car models... which leads me to believe you haven't played it.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: woofis on January 15, 2006, 01:50:00 PM
i said it once and i will say it again... pgr3 is the best looking game out to date for the 360. nfs is alright but gets boring. also has framerate issues. i recommend pgr. the scenery graphics are amazing.... i too think nfs sucks and is not worth 60 bux.
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: Deftech on January 15, 2006, 01:59:00 PM
NFS looking better or as good as PGR 3? I understand its subjective, but thats like saying Splinter Cell 1 looks better than Chaos Theory.

Holy poops I must be in the twilight zone.

Hey they have  pop.gif here!
Title: Real Life Comparison
Post by: cyberg4 on January 15, 2006, 02:23:00 PM
dowload the demos of each game if you do not own them before making comments stating as to which looks/is better.  As for the pics it was hard to tell which one was real and which one was PGR3.  Kudos to Bizarre for making such a great looking game (with good gameplay)