Post by: Australian Rat on July 07, 2005, 03:18:00 AM
But without turning this into a flame post of games you dislike, what would you like to see die with the first xbox?
Personally, I'd love to see an end to the Bloodrayne series. It was just a bad idea from the beginning.
Post by: ILLusions0fGrander on July 07, 2005, 03:38:00 AM
lemony snicket and dukes of hazzard come to mind
Post by: Infamous_One on July 07, 2005, 03:41:00 AM
Driv3r
Barbie Horse Adventures
Post by: ILLusions0fGrander on July 07, 2005, 03:43:00 AM
edit: im thinking yourself fitness doesnt need one either.
Post by: Twasi on July 07, 2005, 03:49:00 AM
Umm third choice would have to be the Madden series. I'm so tired of seeing the same re-hashed game with a few new players and switched up stats every year.
Post by: irishdrunk on July 07, 2005, 03:53:00 AM
James Bond...same as above
Grand Theft Auto...unless it takes place in the middle east, then I'd buy it
Serious Sam
Psi Ops
Post by: popley on July 07, 2005, 06:14:00 AM
sudike
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 07:02:00 AM
QUOTE(popley @ Jul 7 2005, 08:25 AM)
outrun
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: Master-Chief on July 07, 2005, 07:11:00 AM
-
Pretty much EVERY first person shooter for Xbox doesn't need a sequel. When you play any of the Halos, you will realize how much thought Bungie has put into the game and the great support behind it. I try playing other FPS games, but I just don't have a feel for them.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 08:48:00 AM
-
Halo... kinda. The only reason I want Halo on 360 is so they finish the damn story. Halo 2 was like sex without orgasm... decently pleasing until the lack of a big finish. But beyond Halo 3, Halo needs to die a noble death.
I'd like to see FIFA die off... and be replaced with Winning Eleven. FIFA2005 has nothing on WE8 except EA's PR muscle.
Mascot games in general. Chronic the Hemp-hog, Crash Bandaid-cooch, etc... I'm tired of companies trying to make cute fuzzy animals have badass attitudes just to give a system an icon for little kids to identify with.
$20 games. If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one. I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside. Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more.
GTA-style Crime games. If it's not a MMOG leave it at the door. GTA's been done to death. Mission games are fine, but when it becomes a challenge to keep your character thin... it's time to die. I want to go up against human competitors in a turf match.
Unfortunatly, you'll never get rid of sports games that have yearly updates... there are just too many people who will pay $50 for an updated roster. What I think they should do is make the game $60 and send roster updates via content download; then they can save the REAL game/engine upgrades for a NEW game every 2 years.
Mortal Kombat. I really loved Deception despite it's awful (compared to DOA) gameplay. However, I think we need to say goodbye to this game and its 7 (
) or more iterations. A new fighting game with fatalities would be fun, just not with the words Mortal and Kombat in the title.
Dead to Rights... they haven't gotten it right yet, they aren't going to. Max Payne has a better story anyway.
WWII games in general. I swear there were no less than 4 WWII FPS games at E3 this year. Why? How many ways can you fight the same 4 year battle?? It's history, leave it there... for at least a few years.
Games based on movies. I saw the movie... I don't want to play it. Chances are developers butchered the content anyway. Constantine? Fantastic 4? Riddick? All terrible in my book. Spiderman 2 was the only exception to this.
Hmm, I'm sure I'll think of more later.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: krustytheclown on July 07, 2005, 09:10:00 AM
-
I'm really getting tired of all the halo 2 bashing. Yeah, MAYBE it wasn't as good as Halo 1. It still is one of the best games on xbox. GTA is a great series. Anyone can get into it pretty easily.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 09:22:00 AM
-
Post by: Master-Chief on July 07, 2005, 07:11:00 AM
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 08:48:00 AM
I'd like to see FIFA die off... and be replaced with Winning Eleven. FIFA2005 has nothing on WE8 except EA's PR muscle.
Mascot games in general. Chronic the Hemp-hog, Crash Bandaid-cooch, etc... I'm tired of companies trying to make cute fuzzy animals have badass attitudes just to give a system an icon for little kids to identify with.
$20 games. If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one. I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside. Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more.
GTA-style Crime games. If it's not a MMOG leave it at the door. GTA's been done to death. Mission games are fine, but when it becomes a challenge to keep your character thin... it's time to die. I want to go up against human competitors in a turf match.
Unfortunatly, you'll never get rid of sports games that have yearly updates... there are just too many people who will pay $50 for an updated roster. What I think they should do is make the game $60 and send roster updates via content download; then they can save the REAL game/engine upgrades for a NEW game every 2 years.
Mortal Kombat. I really loved Deception despite it's awful (compared to DOA) gameplay. However, I think we need to say goodbye to this game and its 7 (
) or more iterations. A new fighting game with fatalities would be fun, just not with the words Mortal and Kombat in the title.Dead to Rights... they haven't gotten it right yet, they aren't going to. Max Payne has a better story anyway.
WWII games in general. I swear there were no less than 4 WWII FPS games at E3 this year. Why? How many ways can you fight the same 4 year battle?? It's history, leave it there... for at least a few years.
Games based on movies. I saw the movie... I don't want to play it. Chances are developers butchered the content anyway. Constantine? Fantastic 4? Riddick? All terrible in my book. Spiderman 2 was the only exception to this.
Hmm, I'm sure I'll think of more later.
Post by: krustytheclown on July 07, 2005, 09:10:00 AM
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 09:22:00 AM
QUOTE(krustytheclown @ Jul 7 2005, 12:21 PM)
I'm really getting tired of all the halo 2 bashing. Yeah, MAYBE it wasn't as good as Halo 1. It still is one of the best games on xbox. GTA is a great series. Anyone can get into it pretty easily.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: lostboyz on July 07, 2005, 10:17:00 AM
-
mechassault. lame as crap, takes very little skill
all atari sports games, they redefined sub-par
tony hawk. they are all the same.
what they should make is a mature version of super smash bros with master chief, max payne, some characters from upcoming perfect dark 0, MK characters. would be pretty awesome.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: EverestX on July 07, 2005, 10:27:00 AM
-
Post by: lostboyz on July 07, 2005, 10:17:00 AM
all atari sports games, they redefined sub-par
tony hawk. they are all the same.
what they should make is a mature version of super smash bros with master chief, max payne, some characters from upcoming perfect dark 0, MK characters. would be pretty awesome.
Post by: EverestX on July 07, 2005, 10:27:00 AM
QUOTE(Master-Chief @ Jul 7 2005, 09:22 AM)
Pretty much EVERY first person shooter for Xbox doesn't need a sequel. When you play any of the Halos, you will realize how much thought Bungie has put into the game and the great support behind it. I try playing other FPS games, but I just don't have a feel for them.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 10:28:00 AM
-
LPW Riddick? really?
That's easily one of my favorite Xbox games... the only thing it was missing was multiplayer.
I agree that typically games based on movies blow, but there is the occasional shining star. As you pointed out Spiderman is a good game, I felt Riddick was as well also there are lots of good Star Wars games (some are bad but some are even better than the friggin movies).
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 11:57:00 AM
-
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 10:28:00 AM
That's easily one of my favorite Xbox games... the only thing it was missing was multiplayer.
I agree that typically games based on movies blow, but there is the occasional shining star. As you pointed out Spiderman is a good game, I felt Riddick was as well also there are lots of good Star Wars games (some are bad but some are even better than the friggin movies).
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 11:57:00 AM
QUOTE(twistedsymphony @ Jul 7 2005, 01:39 PM)
LPW Riddick? really?
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 12:46:00 PM
-
Though these days if a big budget movie comes out it's pretty much giving that a game will follow, and really not all movies can feasibly be games.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 12:50:00 PM
-
Too true about Fight Club. I was so excited by its potential and let down by its release.
And Enter the Matrix... GOD! WHY? My favorite movie reduced to a mediocre game. Matrix Online looks better, but I'm not interested anymore. I can only touch a hot stove so many times.
Anyway, I'd kinda like to see just about every major franchise take a new direction. I'd like to see genres merged. Racing and fighting games? Burnout Revenge. RTS and Platformer? World of Warcraft. What other grand possiblities are out there?
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: XBL_SUCKS on July 07, 2005, 01:13:00 PM
-
Whacked for starters that game blows or no more Terminator game or Ninja Turtles
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 02:19:00 PM
-
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 12:46:00 PM
Though these days if a big budget movie comes out it's pretty much giving that a game will follow, and really not all movies can feasibly be games.
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 12:50:00 PM
And Enter the Matrix... GOD! WHY? My favorite movie reduced to a mediocre game. Matrix Online looks better, but I'm not interested anymore. I can only touch a hot stove so many times.
Anyway, I'd kinda like to see just about every major franchise take a new direction. I'd like to see genres merged. Racing and fighting games? Burnout Revenge. RTS and Platformer? World of Warcraft. What other grand possiblities are out there?
Post by: XBL_SUCKS on July 07, 2005, 01:13:00 PM
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 07, 2005, 02:19:00 PM
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 03:01 PM)
Too true about Fight Club. I was so excited by its potential and let down by its release.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: pHeelixx on July 07, 2005, 02:38:00 PM
-
You guys forgot a big one HITMAN I loved the fitrst one for pc I still play it!! but everything else sucked!!
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: ILLusions0fGrander on July 07, 2005, 06:16:00 PM
-
whoever said psi-ops... well.. eh, i really liked that game. i would actually like to see sequel
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 07:04:00 PM
-
Post by: pHeelixx on July 07, 2005, 02:38:00 PM
Post by: ILLusions0fGrander on July 07, 2005, 06:16:00 PM
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 07, 2005, 07:04:00 PM
QUOTE(twistedsymphony @ Jul 7 2005, 05:30 PM)
I would LOVE to see a Racing/RPG cross... I think Initial D would be the perfect platform... but not with the show's characters perhapse another driver moving up the ranks in another part of Japan... heck maybe even make it a Racing/MMORPG
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: incognegro on July 08, 2005, 01:22:00 PM
-
)
anyways..........
they should stop any sequels to games that only have one thing going for it : theyre different. Those that use their unorthodox approach as a crutch or smoke screen to hide the fact that they suck. I love a game with original ideas (psi ops) BUT theyre some that just tries too hard and get on my nerves (katamari de-coochie or whatever = BAD GAME). Anyone remember parappa the rapper? HORRIBLE GAME!!!
oh and all mario games should die too, ever since yoshis island (the pinnacle) everything just went downhill from there. Although mario kart still keeps my interest.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: zero129 on July 08, 2005, 04:00:00 PM
-
.
Damn i mean come on, we need to see the 3rd part of halo (ye all know ye only hated it cos of the fact the ending sucked ), Riddick, it's the best thing since GoldenEye, (in movie to game conversions), and i'd love to see a sequal.
Final Fantasy, come on each game has a great story line, and the 12th one looks like it's going to be the best.
Now the only games i'd like to see die from the top of my head are all EA sports games nuff said.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: zero129 on July 08, 2005, 04:00:00 PM
-
.
Damn i mean come on, we need to see the 3rd part of halo (ye all know ye only hated the 2nd one cos of the fact the ending sucked ), Riddick, it's the best thing since GoldenEye, (in movie to game conversions), and i'd love to see a sequal.
Final Fantasy, come on each game has a great story line, and the 12th one looks like it's going to be the best.
Now the only games i'd like to see die from the top of my head are all EA sports games nuff said.
Anyway this is all just my opinion...
Damn sorry double post.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: tactix101 on July 09, 2005, 03:48:00 AM
-
#2 ford motorsport 3 "pass me the bargain bucket so i can hurl" never played 1 or 2 but if 3 is anything to go bye then im glad i didn't
#3 all racing games due for 360 if they dont bring out a decent force feed back wheel. well all except pgr3 cuz i would play that no matter what controller we get
arghh i wanna feel the tug of the opposite lock when im tearing me arse side on round a corner @ 150mph
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: nagmine on July 09, 2005, 11:26:00 AM
-
I personly think gta should hurry up and die. The game always gets so stupid and boring after a couple missions. Oh and any game that has rappers in it... should never be released.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: Carlo210 on July 09, 2005, 03:35:00 PM
-
Post by: incognegro on July 08, 2005, 01:22:00 PM
)anyways..........
they should stop any sequels to games that only have one thing going for it : theyre different. Those that use their unorthodox approach as a crutch or smoke screen to hide the fact that they suck. I love a game with original ideas (psi ops) BUT theyre some that just tries too hard and get on my nerves (katamari de-coochie or whatever = BAD GAME). Anyone remember parappa the rapper? HORRIBLE GAME!!!
oh and all mario games should die too, ever since yoshis island (the pinnacle) everything just went downhill from there. Although mario kart still keeps my interest.
Post by: zero129 on July 08, 2005, 04:00:00 PM
.Damn i mean come on, we need to see the 3rd part of halo (ye all know ye only hated it cos of the fact the ending sucked
), Riddick, it's the best thing since GoldenEye, (in movie to game conversions), and i'd love to see a sequal.Final Fantasy, come on each game has a great story line, and the 12th one looks like it's going to be the best.
Now the only games i'd like to see die from the top of my head are all EA sports games nuff said.
Post by: zero129 on July 08, 2005, 04:00:00 PM
.Damn i mean come on, we need to see the 3rd part of halo (ye all know ye only hated the 2nd one cos of the fact the ending sucked
), Riddick, it's the best thing since GoldenEye, (in movie to game conversions), and i'd love to see a sequal.Final Fantasy, come on each game has a great story line, and the 12th one looks like it's going to be the best.
Now the only games i'd like to see die from the top of my head are all EA sports games nuff said.
Anyway this is all just my opinion...
Damn sorry double post.
Post by: tactix101 on July 09, 2005, 03:48:00 AM
#2 ford motorsport 3 "pass me the bargain bucket so i can hurl" never played 1 or 2 but if 3 is anything to go bye then im glad i didn't
#3 all racing games due for 360 if they dont bring out a decent force feed back wheel. well all except pgr3 cuz i would play that no matter what controller we get
arghh i wanna feel the tug of the opposite lock when im tearing me arse side on round a corner @ 150mph
Post by: nagmine on July 09, 2005, 11:26:00 AM
Post by: Carlo210 on July 09, 2005, 03:35:00 PM
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 09:01 PM)
Too true about Fight Club. I was so excited by its potential and let down by its release.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: BurnerAzR on July 09, 2005, 04:59:00 PM
-
.
#1. Gta... Come on, how can you make a sequel about the same old sh*t.
Gta illinois.. stealing lawn mowers.. err
#2. True Crimes, man the sequel was horible. I played it for 5 minutes, ran back to block buster and asked for the 5 minutes of life i lost playing this "game".
#3. Kotor... na kotor is great but the madden series needs to die already.
Same sh*t different year... oh and they update the roster ! What are we on now.. 2008 ? Im getting tired of hearing "hey you play the new madden yet".. i only have one reply to that.. "Whats new"
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: BurnerAzR on July 09, 2005, 08:26:00 PM
-
w00ps ment dead to rights 2... god that game was so bad i forgot the name.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 11, 2005, 07:13:00 AM
-
Post by: BurnerAzR on July 09, 2005, 04:59:00 PM
.#1. Gta... Come on, how can you make a sequel about the same old sh*t.
Gta illinois.. stealing lawn mowers.. err
#2. True Crimes, man the sequel was horible. I played it for 5 minutes, ran back to block buster and asked for the 5 minutes of life i lost playing this "game".
#3. Kotor... na kotor is great but the madden series needs to die already.
Same sh*t different year... oh and they update the roster ! What are we on now.. 2008 ? Im getting tired of hearing "hey you play the new madden yet".. i only have one reply to that.. "Whats new"
Post by: BurnerAzR on July 09, 2005, 08:26:00 PM
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 11, 2005, 07:13:00 AM
QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Jul 9 2005, 06:46 PM)
World of Warcraft isnt a merged RTS and >Platformer<, that's like saying diablo2 is a rts and platformer werge, along with guild wars. They do have their own genre, you know.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: lostboyz on July 11, 2005, 07:30:00 AM
-
there just cant be a true RTS on 360 unless they release a keyboard and mouse. nuff said
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: Reaper527 on July 11, 2005, 05:05:00 PM
-
Post by: lostboyz on July 11, 2005, 07:30:00 AM
Post by: Reaper527 on July 11, 2005, 05:05:00 PM
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 04:59 PM)
$20 games. If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one. I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside. Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 11, 2005, 07:54:00 PM
-
I agree... I'm all for $20 puzzle games, or $20 ports with improved graphics, or $20 sports games with new rosters... I think there needs to be MORE price points that accurately reflect the amount of content you're getting not just the age of the content.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 12, 2005, 07:36:00 AM
-
I don't disagree. I think my original comment was too much of a blanket statement. I'd prefer to see a quality standard implemented as a means to weed out the trash. I guess that goes against the free market ideal... My issue with $20 games of which I have a few (Outlaw Golf 2 and Guilty Gear XX are brilliant), is that I can't distinguish garbage from quality. Reviewers always take price into account and rate games higher than they deserve with the comment "The game sucks, but for $20, you get what you pay for." That's the kind of thing I'd like to see abandoned. Wishful thinking I suppose?
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 12, 2005, 09:03:00 AM
-
PES/WE with the full blown license would be great. I have no problem ju7st using the wolf's paych. I prefer to play PES on my PC anyways.
Except Konami needs to understand 360 degree movement. That is the only drawback in PES/WE that the series that FIFA does have.
Are you nuts? I love every ESPN 2K5 sports game. They were all $20. NFL 2K5 made madden look like backyard football. NBA 2K5 plays much better than NBA Live. College Hoops 2K5 smashed march Madness. NHL 2K5 just seems more fun than EA's hockey game. I can't really say much for MLB 2K5 though, as I don't like baseball. I think all sports games should be no more than $20. i mean what are you really getting besides roster updates and minor tweaks.
I do feel that fighting games should be no more than $20. Don't get me wrong, I love Soul Calibur 1& 2 to death, but when do I ever play it single player..........................never.................most people don't.
As for games I feel should die on xbox.....................HALO. As a person that was playing FPS way back in the day, how can anyone think this game is great? You must be either young, only a console gamer, or just a fucking retard.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 12, 2005, 09:57:00 AM
-
Deftones, I amended my statement. See above your post.
I don't really like pro sports games (except WE8 and NHL) so I could care less what price bracket they fall in.
With the advent of online fighting, I don't mind dropping $50 on a fighting game if it's worth it... and DOA is really the only one I see that's worth it.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: Andy51 on July 12, 2005, 12:21:00 PM
-
Dragon Ball Z should die
The James Bond games should die, but please EA build up on the 007: Everything or Nothing... That game was sick! So basically Just Third person shooter of James Bond...
Aha!
Serious Sam!!!
I must say this... Tony Hawk!!! I stopped playing Tony Hawk after the first one for Xbox, It was number 3 in the series I think...
Halo 3... Yes I want no Halo 4... C'mon Bungie, I bet they can make something else? like Gnop 2? hehe....
Jaws... the game isn't out yet, but it looks like crap enough for it not to have a sequel...
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: incognegro on July 12, 2005, 01:37:00 PM
-
Ive played alot of fps's on pc's (before i figured out there were other types of games for pc) and even though they cause my wrists to hurt like a mother...... i enjoyed them and thought they were (quake 3 is one of my fav games of all time)great. When i got my hands on the first halo i expected to suck cause its on a console but i never had such fun playing a GAME in my life. If you think it suck, you havent played it enough or im a fucking retard
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: Andy51 on July 13, 2005, 01:06:00 PM
-
Well back when I had a decent computer to play Half life 2, Quake 3, Unreal Tournment...
Basically 2 our of these games barely had any storyline...
Half-Life... (The first one) had a amazing storyline but motherfuker puzzles!!!
As for Halo... Awesome Storyline line, some good Muiltplayer, barely any puzzles... like you know? pushing crates in Half Life??? Not exactly my type of FPS...HALO was smooth...
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 13, 2005, 01:20:00 PM
-
Neither. I don't like any console shooter. I even tried to give Halo a go with the PC version............it still sucked IMO.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: incognegro on July 13, 2005, 02:59:00 PM
-
i agree on the pc halo statement (im agreeing with deftones.....wow) it sucked! really bad. Some games should stick to their guns (so to speak).Lets hope no more pc halos are in the making....
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: JimmyDeushku on July 14, 2005, 09:38:00 PM
-
All of those 2D games like Streetfighter DEFINETLY don't need sequels. Soul-Calibur is gay too. Half-Life 2 is awesome and needs many more sequels.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: corridon on July 14, 2005, 10:54:00 PM
-
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 11, 2005, 07:54:00 PM
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 12, 2005, 07:36:00 AM
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 12, 2005, 09:03:00 AM
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 10:59 AM)
I'd like to see FIFA die off... and be replaced with Winning Eleven. FIFA2005 has nothing on WE8 except EA's PR muscle.
PES/WE with the full blown license would be great. I have no problem ju7st using the wolf's paych. I prefer to play PES on my PC anyways.
Except Konami needs to understand 360 degree movement. That is the only drawback in PES/WE that the series that FIFA does have.QUOTE(LowProfileWurm)
$20 games. If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one. I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside. Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more.
Are you nuts? I love every ESPN 2K5 sports game. They were all $20. NFL 2K5 made madden look like backyard football. NBA 2K5 plays much better than NBA Live. College Hoops 2K5 smashed march Madness. NHL 2K5 just seems more fun than EA's hockey game. I can't really say much for MLB 2K5 though, as I don't like baseball. I think all sports games should be no more than $20. i mean what are you really getting besides roster updates and minor tweaks.
I do feel that fighting games should be no more than $20. Don't get me wrong, I love Soul Calibur 1& 2 to death, but when do I ever play it single player..........................never.................most people don't.
As for games I feel should die on xbox.....................HALO. As a person that was playing FPS way back in the day, how can anyone think this game is great? You must be either young, only a console gamer, or just a fucking retard.
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 12, 2005, 09:57:00 AM
I don't really like pro sports games (except WE8 and NHL) so I could care less what price bracket they fall in.
With the advent of online fighting, I don't mind dropping $50 on a fighting game if it's worth it... and DOA is really the only one I see that's worth it.
Post by: Andy51 on July 12, 2005, 12:21:00 PM
The James Bond games should die, but please EA build up on the 007: Everything or Nothing... That game was sick! So basically Just Third person shooter of James Bond...
Aha!
Serious Sam!!!
I must say this... Tony Hawk!!! I stopped playing Tony Hawk after the first one for Xbox, It was number 3 in the series I think...
Halo 3... Yes I want no Halo 4... C'mon Bungie, I bet they can make something else? like Gnop 2? hehe....
Jaws... the game isn't out yet, but it looks like crap enough for it not to have a sequel...
Post by: incognegro on July 12, 2005, 01:37:00 PM
QUOTE
As for games I feel should die on xbox.....................HALO. As a person that was playing FPS way back in the day, how can anyone think this game is great? You must be either young, only a console gamer, or just a fucking retard
Ive played alot of fps's on pc's (before i figured out there were other types of games for pc) and even though they cause my wrists to hurt like a mother...... i enjoyed them and thought they were (quake 3 is one of my fav games of all time)great. When i got my hands on the first halo i expected to suck cause its on a console but i never had such fun playing a GAME in my life. If you think it suck, you havent played it enough or im a fucking retard
Post by: Andy51 on July 13, 2005, 01:06:00 PM
Well back when I had a decent computer to play Half life 2, Quake 3, Unreal Tournment...
Basically 2 our of these games barely had any storyline...
Half-Life... (The first one) had a amazing storyline but motherfuker puzzles!!!
As for Halo... Awesome Storyline line, some good Muiltplayer, barely any puzzles... like you know? pushing crates in Half Life??? Not exactly my type of FPS...HALO was smooth...
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 13, 2005, 01:20:00 PM
QUOTE(incognegro @ Jul 12 2005, 03:48 PM)
If you think it suck, you havent played it enough or im a fucking retard
Neither.
I don't like any console shooter. I even tried to give Halo a go with the PC version............it still sucked IMO.
Post by: incognegro on July 13, 2005, 02:59:00 PM
Post by: JimmyDeushku on July 14, 2005, 09:38:00 PM
All of those 2D games like Streetfighter DEFINETLY don't need sequels. Soul-Calibur is gay too. Half-Life 2 is awesome and needs many more sequels.
Post by: corridon on July 14, 2005, 10:54:00 PM
QUOTE(incognegro @ Jul 14 2005, 08:10 AM)
i agree on the pc halo statement (im agreeing with deftones.....wow) it sucked! really bad. Some games should stick to their guns (so to speak).Lets hope no more pc halos are in the making....
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: themadman123 on July 14, 2005, 11:56:00 PM
-
I can't understand some people....
OK I understand that you like playing a game. I understand you wanting to play online everyone, becuase there are diffrent people everyday. But if I have to hear one more person say that Halo is the greatest game ever and have to hear them tell me that they just beat Halo on Ledgendary for the 28th time, I'm gonna kill some.
I just can't think how playing the same game over every day is fun. Once I beat a game, on any system I RARELY go back to it. Unless it is the multiplayer or any of the games I played when I was a kid, Like Mario, but still I don't play that every day.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 15, 2005, 08:21:00 AM
-
I am hard to get along with, I know
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 16, 2005, 07:19:00 AM
-
Post by: themadman123 on July 14, 2005, 11:56:00 PM
OK I understand that you like playing a game. I understand you wanting to play online everyone, becuase there are diffrent people everyday. But if I have to hear one more person say that Halo is the greatest game ever and have to hear them tell me that they just beat Halo on Ledgendary for the 28th time, I'm gonna kill some.
I just can't think how playing the same game over every day is fun. Once I beat a game, on any system I RARELY go back to it. Unless it is the multiplayer or any of the games I played when I was a kid, Like Mario, but still I don't play that every day.
Post by: deftonesmx17 on July 15, 2005, 08:21:00 AM
QUOTE(incognegro @ Jul 13 2005, 05:10 PM)
(im agreeing with deftones.....wow)
I am hard to get along with, I know
Post by: LowProfileWurm on July 16, 2005, 07:19:00 AM
QUOTE(miggidy @ Jul 16 2005, 04:34 AM)
Hell we don't have enough 2D games, ones like Street Fighter.
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: chris_kalan on July 16, 2005, 08:38:00 AM
-
I wouldn't mind any of these titles going bye bye:
Namco Museum / PacMan / All Game Anthology Collections
Grand Theft Auto Series
Crash Bandicoot Series (at least kill it on the XBOX)
All Barbie games...EVER
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 18, 2005, 09:35:00 AM
-
Post by: chris_kalan on July 16, 2005, 08:38:00 AM
Namco Museum / PacMan / All Game Anthology Collections
Grand Theft Auto Series
Crash Bandicoot Series (at least kill it on the XBOX)
All Barbie games...EVER
Post by: twistedsymphony on July 18, 2005, 09:35:00 AM
QUOTE(themadman123 @ Jul 15 2005, 02:07 AM)
I can't understand some people....
-
Title: Games That Don't Need Sequels
Post by: miggidy on July 19, 2005, 09:29:00 AM
-
hahaha! That was funny!
But so true....
Another game I would love to remain in 2D is Castlevania.
I know Konami has released several 2D versions on the GBA but they are nothing compared to Symphony of the Night.
Konami's stab at the 3D realm with Lament of Innocence was very disappointing.
And now they're giving it another shot with Curse of Darkness.
These games will never compare to S.O.T.N. and are pretty much dead on arrival simply because they aren't in 2D.
I'm glad to see there's still some 2D fans around. I mean it's not that 2D is better than 3D, it's just that certain games play better in 2D.
We're gamers, and we are about good games, that's all.
Developers seem to think that 2D no longer sells, and this is why they all abandoned 2D. What a shame....
Post by: miggidy on July 19, 2005, 09:29:00 AM
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 16 2005, 03:30 PM)
Speaking of which... have you seen the KOF: Maniax game? Ugh! It looks like SNK tried to rape DOA with a Mai shaped dildo.
hahaha! That was funny!
But so true....
Another game I would love to remain in 2D is Castlevania.
I know Konami has released several 2D versions on the GBA but they are nothing compared to Symphony of the Night.
Konami's stab at the 3D realm with Lament of Innocence was very disappointing.
And now they're giving it another shot with Curse of Darkness.
These games will never compare to S.O.T.N. and are pretty much dead on arrival simply because they aren't in 2D.
I'm glad to see there's still some 2D fans around. I mean it's not that 2D is better than 3D, it's just that certain games play better in 2D.
We're gamers, and we are about good games, that's all.
Developers seem to think that 2D no longer sells, and this is why they all abandoned 2D. What a shame....