Post by: Schtrom on August 08, 2009, 03:52:00 AM
DosFlash V1.8
--------------------------
- now supports LiteOn PLDS DG-16D2S 83850C V2 Geremia/Maximus LiteOn FreeKey method
- huge firmware read/write speed increase, especially if run from a floppy disk
- updated IDE/SATA motherboard chipset list
- new IDE/SATA detection for Windows and DOS
- DosFlash.typ embedded in executable file
- LiteOn V1 drive key is now extracted 10 times and compared against each other,
after the extraction a summary is displayed sorted by the most common matches
- LiteOn V2 drive key is extracted 2 times and compared
- new BenQ unlock keys added to unlock all known BenQ drive firmwares
- command line parameter "EnableDrives" removed, DosFlash asks the user on
application close if he wants to enable the drives or not, during the tests it
seems that IDE drives have problems with the enable, SATA drives seem to
work fine
- new 64-bit DosFlash edition added called DosFlash64, because some driver
functions don't work as expected in the 32 bit compatibility mode on Windows x64
- Beta state removed
- ready and tested on Windows7 X86 and x64
Geremia/Maximus FreeKey method with DosFlash16
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have added one cmd line parameter for DosFlash16 in manual mode. The COM port
is simply ignored and can have any value for the V2 drives.
Use the following command line to extract your free key from 83850C:
- DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
Tips for running DosFlash on Windows 7
--------------------------------------------------------
Since Windows Vista 64 Bit and upwards it is necessary that every driver is signed. Because
the DosFlash driver will not be signed by MS due to some unknown reason we need to cicumvent
this check. You have the following 2 possibilities to do this.
Safe Way of Disabling Driver Signature Enforcement
1) On Windows 7 bootup press F8 to get to the extended boot options screen
2) Choose "Disable Driver Signature Enforcement"
3) To start DosFlash right click on it in Windows Explorer and choose
"Run as administrator" > answer the message box with "Yes"
4) Short after the program started a "Program Compatibility Assistant" warning message
is displayed, you can simply ignore this by pressing the "Close" button
Recommended Way of Disabling Driver Signature Enforcement
1) Disable User Account Control (UAC)
- go to "Start Menu" > "Control Panel" > "User Accounts and Family Safety" > "User Accounts"
- click on "Change User Account Control settings"
- set the slider bar to the lowest value (Never notify) > click "OK"
2) Sign the DosFlash driver
- download the "Driver Signature Enforcement Overrider" (DSEO) from
http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo
- start DSEO > click "Next" > "Yes" > choose "Sign a System File" > "Next" > enter the path to
the used driver (portio32.sys or portio64.sys) > "OK" > "OK"
3) Disable Driver Signature Enforcement
- start DSEO > click "Next" > "Yes" > choose "Enable Test Mode" > "Next" > "OK"
4) Restart the computer
Keep in mind that with the recommended way the changes will have effect on every reboot without
doing anything manual. The first way needs to be done over and over again. In addition the second
way can be used to sign every driver that doesn't run natively on Windows 7.
For use of the VIA Cards in Windows 7 it is recommended to uninstall the VIA driver. This can be
done like follows:
- start "Device Manager" > expand "Storage controllers" > right click on "VIA RAID Controller" >
choose "Uninstall" > "OK"
- rename C:\Windows\inf\vsmraid.inf to vsmraid.inf_
- rename C:\Windows\inf\vsmraid.PNF to vsmraid.PNF_
- rename C:\Windows\System32\drivers\vsmraid.sys to vsmraid.sys_
- reboot computer
Much respect and credits go to Geremia and Maximus for their money saving FreeKey app
and their lightning like decryption speed!
In Dedication To The Birth Of FreeKey On August Fifth 2009
Kai Schtrom
This post has been edited by Schtrom: Aug 8 2009, 10:54 AM
Post by: hardie on August 08, 2009, 04:02:00 AM
Post by: Takashi on August 08, 2009, 04:09:00 AM
Post by: Geremia on August 08, 2009, 04:50:00 AM
GEREMIA LOVES SCHTROM
Post by: cypher21 on August 08, 2009, 05:18:00 AM
Just tried it with a Samsung on Win7 x64 and it works flawlessly.
Have to setup some things, but runs great!
Is there a Portio64.inf file available somewhere too?
This post has been edited by cypher21: Aug 8 2009, 12:24 PM
Post by: deilzfcjk on August 08, 2009, 05:22:00 AM
Post by: Exobex on August 08, 2009, 06:04:00 AM
Post by: podger on August 08, 2009, 06:37:00 AM
Post by: dangal on August 08, 2009, 10:58:00 AM
The scene is live again!!!!!
Post by: Bazdoctor on August 08, 2009, 11:02:00 AM
QUOTE(Schtrom @ Aug 8 2009, 07:52 PM) 
In Dedication To The Birth Of FreeKey On August Fifth 2009
Ha, nice. Thank you very much for this.
Post by: Paperstack.1 on August 08, 2009, 12:18:00 PM
Post by: jimwross on August 08, 2009, 12:43:00 PM
QUOTE(Exobex @ Aug 8 2009, 07:04 AM)
Is the key.bin a decrypted version when doing V2 drives, or is FreeKey still needed?
Key get's decrypted.
Post by: Mysterious on August 08, 2009, 01:04:00 PM
As i bought a xbox 360 recently and i got a Falcon Mobo or is it possible for it to be on my falcon one as well
Post by: derajenator on August 08, 2009, 01:55:00 PM
Post by: PornOH on August 08, 2009, 02:02:00 PM
If so, I will try it right now. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
QUOTE(Mysterious @ Aug 8 2009, 12:04 PM)
These new firmware of Lite-On drives are only on the new jasper mobo's right?
As i bought a xbox 360 recently and i got a Falcon Mobo or is it possible for it to be on my falcon one as well
If you get an xbox repaired it will likely come with the new drive. MS is replacing the old drives with the new.
This post has been edited by PornOH: Aug 8 2009, 09:03 PM
Post by: Mitchel92 on August 08, 2009, 02:27:00 PM
QUOTE
Use the following command line to extract your free key from 83850C:
- DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
- DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
so once we do that, can we just use the dummy.bin that was generated by dosflash and run it through firmtool to obtain a flashable firmware? (kinda like how it worked with the old liteon drives)?
And we are still erasing the drive completely (with l-o-eras), before flashing, right?
Thank You
This post has been edited by Mitchel92: Aug 8 2009, 09:34 PM
Post by: TheDemonIII on August 08, 2009, 02:48:00 PM
hopefully team jungle will follow along with 64-bit support
This post has been edited by TheDemonIII: Aug 8 2009, 09:49 PM
Post by: Johnny HugeButt on August 08, 2009, 03:24:00 PM
DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
is the sata port to which the liteon is connected?
Post by: razzy35uk on August 08, 2009, 03:27:00 PM
QUOTE(Johnny HugeButt @ Aug 8 2009, 09:24 PM)
i assume that 0970 in the cmd line
DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
is the sata port to which the liteon is connected?
i was about to ask the same thing `
Use the following command line to extract your free key from 83850C:
- DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
im assuming 0970 is the sata port where i would put 1460 and the 1 afterwards means master ?
by the way thanks for this
p
Post by: syntaxerror329 on August 08, 2009, 04:24:00 PM
QUOTE
new BenQ unlock keys added to unlock all known BenQ drive firmwares
I always wondered why it failed sometimes. Wasn't a big deal but itÂ’s nice to see you have found perfection.
QUOTE
- command line parameter "EnableDrives" removed, DosFlash asks the user on
application close if he wants to enable the drives or not, during the tests it
seems that IDE drives have problems with the enable, SATA drives seem to
work fine
application close if he wants to enable the drives or not, during the tests it
seems that IDE drives have problems with the enable, SATA drives seem to
work fine
I could have lived fine without this feature.
Now it just nags me every time I close it with a yes/no screen.
Is it difficult to add a remember my selection checkbox? (I love those)
Also my computer doesn't like it when you enable the IDE DVD drive however if I uninstall it and search for new hardware it works fine every time.
Of course its also great to see the new lite-on has been implemented!
Fine work indeed!
Post by: PornOH on August 08, 2009, 04:39:00 PM
QUOTE(syntaxerror329 @ Aug 8 2009, 03:24 PM)
Thanks Schtrom, it works great.
Unrelated - but your xbox 360 rom prices are ridiculous. $89.99 for a BenQ? :rofl: They're like $20 NEW on ebay, among other places.
Post by: brandogg on August 08, 2009, 07:39:00 PM
Post by: dsavage on August 08, 2009, 11:16:00 PM
i just used JF to get my key since thats really all i needed to spoof in my benq.
i did however use dosflash to flash my benq, always have.
Post by: harrytasker on August 09, 2009, 01:41:00 AM
This post has been edited by harrytasker: Aug 9 2009, 08:55 AM
Post by: farntheplaya on August 09, 2009, 01:45:00 AM
its so tempting, I want to install windows 7 but I cant because of jungleflasher!!
I was actually considering getting a new computer just so i can leave my current setup for modding and a new one for windows 7
Post by: Geen Rommel on August 09, 2009, 03:41:00 AM
QUOTE(farntheplaya @ Aug 9 2009, 09:45 AM)
I was actually considering getting a new computer just so i can leave my current setup for modding and a new one for windows 7 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
[sarcasm]
- Right, they should invent a boot loader that can boot more than one OS on a single computer.
Post by: majinsoftware on August 09, 2009, 03:50:00 AM
QUOTE(Geen Rommel @ Aug 9 2009, 11:41 AM)
[sarcasm]
- Right, they should invent a boot loader that can boot more than one OS on a single computer.
But having a separate modding computer is just so more L33t.
I personally have a separate computer for modding thats not connected to the internet and its out in the cold garage.
That stops me from installing anything not needed on it and I know its going be exactly how I want it when I come to modding another box.
Post by: Xoxide on August 09, 2009, 05:02:00 AM
QUOTE(Schtrom @ Aug 8 2009, 10:52 AM)
- new 64-bit DosFlash edition added called DosFlash64, because some driver
functions don't work as expected in the 32 bit compatibility mode on Windows x64
- ready and tested on Windows7 X86 and x64
ITS SO MAGICAL (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
Post by: K1LLERHORNET on August 09, 2009, 08:47:00 AM
QUOTE(Geen Rommel @ Aug 9 2009, 10:41 AM)
[sarcasm]
- Right, they should invent a boot loader that can boot more than one OS on a single computer.
QUOTE(farntheplaya @ Aug 9 2009, 08:45 AM)
x64 version is much appreciated
its so tempting, I want to install windows 7 but I cant because of jungleflasher!!
I was actually considering getting a new computer just so i can leave my current setup for modding and a new one for windows 7 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Why not dual boot?
Just use a spare HDD for an x86 OS.
Post by: ydgmms on August 09, 2009, 10:05:00 AM
My main OS is Win7. But I can boot into WinXP, flash a drive, and go back to Win7 no problems.
Post by: laaaap on August 09, 2009, 07:58:00 PM
half open when ? full open when ? some details please *?
it works with intel sata *?
also , does xbox drive must be turned on with sata conected to pc or to console ?
thanks for help
Post by: moh82mk on August 09, 2009, 09:20:00 PM
QUOTE(laaaap @ Aug 9 2009, 09:58 PM)
any info about position of drive door?
half open when ? full open when ? some details please *?
it works with intel sata *?
also , does xbox drive must be turned on with sata conected to pc or to console ?
thanks for help
These are my questions as well. Anybody can provide a brief tutorial or answer these question? Specially if it can be done using a Intel 82810 chip.
Thank
Post by: Xmodss on August 10, 2009, 06:41:00 AM
This post has been edited by Xmodss: Aug 10 2009, 01:42 PM
Post by: FrostyTheSnowman on August 10, 2009, 08:45:00 AM
Props dude.
This scene never ceases to amaze me.
Post by: HotKnife420 on August 10, 2009, 05:34:00 PM
To elaborate on "buggy", I couldn't get a samsung to dump, or a liteon to erase/flash. The same hardware (system with ICH5) has been used constantly with JF with little to no problems, so config/chipset is good. Dosflash 1.7 works better on ICH5, if that helps anyone out.
Post by: Obveron on August 11, 2009, 06:43:00 AM
Post by: vike105 on August 11, 2009, 08:55:00 AM
Post by: Supernana on August 14, 2009, 05:13:00 AM
DosFlash LITEON K 0970 1 inquiry.bin identify.bin key.bin dummy.bin enckey.bin
but tell me "can't get inquiry data"
Post by: OggyUK on August 14, 2009, 05:25:00 AM
Post by: chitugi on August 14, 2009, 04:10:00 PM
Post by: chitugi on August 14, 2009, 04:41:00 PM
Post by: thestanleycup on August 14, 2009, 10:59:00 PM
many thanx again
Post by: chitugi on August 14, 2009, 11:17:00 PM
Post by: razzy35uk on August 15, 2009, 10:52:00 PM
thanks Schtrom yr tools are well appreciated :-)
This post has been edited by razzy35uk: Aug 16 2009, 05:53 AM
Post by: mygdani on August 16, 2009, 01:14:00 AM
Post by: azuziel on August 20, 2009, 06:26:00 AM
Am I understanding correctly that lite-on's can now be flashed without the use of a hardware probe?
Thanks,
Az
This post has been edited by azuziel: Aug 20 2009, 01:27 PM
Post by: morningglory9999 on August 20, 2009, 05:34:00 PM
Post by: Takashi on August 20, 2009, 07:53:00 PM
Post by: Klutsh on August 28, 2009, 01:31:00 AM
CODE
dosflash e 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 d8 0
results in invalid flash status.
CODE
dosflash w 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 benq_cfw.bin 0
results in it showing writing 4 banks of data to the drive, and gives a successful message. But it actually does not write anything to the drive.
Whats confusing me is that
CODE
dosflash r 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 orig.bin 0
actually dumps the firmware.
Post by: podger on August 28, 2009, 03:28:00 AM
QUOTE(Klutsh @ Aug 28 2009, 07:31 AM)
Does anybody know the correct cmd line parameters for BenQ drives?
CODE
dosflash e 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 d8 0
results in invalid flash status.
CODE
dosflash w 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 benq_cfw.bin 0
results in it showing writing 4 banks of data to the drive, and gives a successful message. But it actually does not write anything to the drive.
Whats confusing me is that
CODE
dosflash r 9000 1 a0 1 1 4 orig.bin 0
actually dumps the firmware.
I'm not a big user of Dosflash as you know,
BUT I believe you have parameter 6 wrong.... In the Usage this is called [Flash Type]. It is used to select special handling for SST Spi's on Benq. These are very rare and have only appeared on HK replacment drives.
I believe the cmd lines
CODE
dosflash e 9000 1 a0 1 0 4 d8 0
and
CODE
dosflash w 9000 1 a0 1 0 4 benq_cfw.bin 0
should work for you
this parameter would have no relevance on a read.
Hope this helps, but I have not tested it.....
This post has been edited by podger: Aug 28 2009, 10:29 AM
Post by: HOMiE7 on August 28, 2009, 03:42:00 AM
Post by: deilzfcjk on August 28, 2009, 04:06:00 PM
I know v1.7 was different from the last time I flashed a drive using previous versions of dosflash. I don't know when it changed though. Either from v1.5-v1.6 it changed or from v1.6--->v1.7. There was only 2 parameters after the "a0" paramenter prior. But, in newer versions of dosflash there was three parameters after the 'a0' parameter. Try changing it as Podger says.