QUOTE (LepPpeR @ Mar 31 2003, 09:39 PM) |
I would like a Mistubishi Lancer Evo VII which has arrived in the states. It is a beautiful car. |
QUOTE (sith @ Apr 6 2003, 10:47 AM) |
Yeah i took the wrx for sure. but if u where smart u would have made it an sti, actually, this is the sti i was driving yesterday.. its my father-in-law, John Paynter's, him and his brother are 2000 and 2001 canadian national champions. I can pull a 2:12 at AMP where he gets a 1:51. |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 05:38 PM) | ||||
modern day muscle cars are far from inefficient. you only have a select breed of cars you can brag about. mainly the skyline and the supra. both pushing $60k + price tags new. a 96 tt supra still goes for $30k in decent shape. if you want tp compare those cars be prepared to go against vipers, vettes, saleens, ligenfelters, exotics etc... an 03 cobra comes stock with 390fwhp hp. they actually dyno 360-370 rwhp which puts that 390 to more like 430fwhp. do you know how much ground your cute little 4 cylinder has to make up to even consider catching up? that car is also only $34k brand new. your top end wrx and lancer is approx. $28-30K. dont compare a 1,000 hp v6, cause i can come back at you with a 5,000+ hp drag car .. when it comes to best bang for the buck, and most easily modified the v8 is always gonna be on top. imorts can be made fast, but wrx's sure like to break those awd trannys. the last 3 times ive been at the track theres been at least one that broke cause of tranny failure. i drag race all the time, and get sick of the whole ricer "fast and the furious scene". its way out of hand with too many misinformed ricers. me personally i dont like old muscle cars, i like new modern muscle. and dont come back with the good ol' hp per liter saying if a mustang was as efficient as a ricer car it would be 500+hp stock. cause if all cars were as efficient as a yamaha r1 that makes 150hp per liter then the s2000 would be 300hp. lets not forget about torque either? imports have none, which is why they need turbos, and awd vehicles. you ricers have no idea what your missing till you drive something with "TORQUE" |
QUOTE (focusracer1 @ Mar 31 2003, 03:23 PM) |
LOL...that wired rim, nike swoosh sticker is pretty ghetto. |
QUOTE (Mage @ Mar 31 2003, 03:12 PM) | ||
Many Japanese engines are designed with turbo. The Nissan r34 skyline engine is twin turbo stock. You can't just say take away your turbo, how about then we say you can only have a v4? Same idea, you're limiting what the engine was designed for. Course the skyline might have better handling also...but that's a whole different story |
QUOTE (Mage @ Mar 31 2003, 03:28 PM) | ||||||
More power? How? You don't factor in gas usage if you're saying that. The skyline is a prime example of good engineering. Damn good car. |
QUOTE (Mage @ Mar 31 2003, 12:52 PM) | ||
Challenge a real import car. I'm a fan of nissan engines. American muscle cars are old and ineffient. Why get something so heavy? |
QUOTE (Audiracer @ Mar 31 2003, 03:32 PM) |
Im with you Mage, you cant just say "give me an N/A import car, then we'll race". You have to compare cars for what they are. Not to mention Many american mucsle cars use turbos and supercharges, so dont give me that shit. I'd rather start off with a Slower car than you, that stock out Handles yours, and with a little $ $moke the shit out your Heavy, Ugly, gas Waisting, Only go fast off the line car. Why not take a look at an Audi S4 huh? 250hp stock, 258 lb-ft torque, 5v per cyclinder, twin turbo, intercooled, and AWD. Then.... Drop out the turbos and replace them with a Slightly larger pair, a chip, intake, and exhaust and ull have a car with 450 hp that will dump on ur car in every way. Looks better, Handles better, Faster, I mean you're beat. |
QUOTE |
turbos and replace them with a Slightly larger pair, a chip, intake, and exhaust and ull have a car with 450 hp |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 03:38 PM) | ||||
modern day muscle cars are far from inefficient. you only have a select breed of cars you can brag about. mainly the skyline and the supra. both pushing $60k + price tags new. a 96 tt supra still goes for $30k in decent shape. if you want tp compare those cars be prepared to go against vipers, vettes, saleens, ligenfelters, exotics etc... an 03 cobra comes stock with 390fwhp hp. they actually dyno 360-370 rwhp which puts that 390 to more like 430fwhp. do you know how much ground your cute little 4 cylinder has to make up to even consider catching up? that car is also only $34k brand new. your top end wrx and lancer is approx. $28-30K. dont compare a 1,000 hp v6, cause i can come back at you with a 5,000+ hp drag car .. when it comes to best bang for the buck, and most easily modified the v8 is always gonna be on top. imorts can be made fast, but wrx's sure like to break those awd trannys. the last 3 times ive been at the track theres been at least one that broke cause of tranny failure. i drag race all the time, and get sick of the whole ricer "fast and the furious scene". its way out of hand with too many misinformed ricers. me personally i dont like old muscle cars, i like new modern muscle. and dont come back with the good ol' hp per liter saying if a mustang was as efficient as a ricer car it would be 500+hp stock. cause if all cars were as efficient as a yamaha r1 that makes 150hp per liter then the s2000 would be 300hp. lets not forget about torque either? imports have none, which is why they need turbos, and awd vehicles. you ricers have no idea what your missing till you drive something with "TORQUE" |
QUOTE (Audiracer @ Mar 31 2003, 03:40 PM) |
Can I just say AdmStng, You are and Idiot! |
QUOTE |
Heavy, Ugly, gas Waisting, Only go fast off the line car. |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 03:43 PM) | ||
how much is an s4? ill take a saleen s281 extreme anyday. comes STOCK with 450 hp and can easily outhandle your cute audi. the 03 cobra blocks are rated at 1,000hp. its very easily modified. forged steel crank, 4v per cylinder, manley h-beam rods, etc.... put 450hp on that audi. not designed for it = KABOOM... and there goes your warranty too ... ive owned imports in the past, but ive now seen the light. i muscle |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 03:48 PM) |
the best part about most you guys is your too young to even drive let alone tell us whats better. 12-11 second ls1's and 5.0/4.6 are a dime a dozen. 16 second imports terrorise the streets and the track on a weekly basis ... with the one quick one that they all flock to like there defender. do any of you guys go to the track? |
QUOTE (focusracer1 @ Mar 31 2003, 01:48 PM) |
You guys are compairing apples and bananas. Muscle cars and four bangers are a totaly differant types of cars. We all have prefrences, lets just see that and stop the bickering. I'm not a huge fan of muscle cars, but you don't see slammin on them. Plus when you talk about hoespower on an import, most of the HP comes at very high RPM's. Take the Honda S2000, the HP tops out like at 7300 RPM, whats up with that.... As opposed to V-8's are have a lot of torque which translates into more power at lower ends of the power band |
QUOTE (AdmStng @ Mar 31 2003, 01:51 PM) | ||
your pretty damn funny and yet speak the truth |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 03:57 PM) | ||||
is that your t/a in your sig? |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 04:03 PM) |
i love ls1's .... they respond so well to mods its insane... thats the only vehicle i fear on the street. kinds funny wrx's are on the subject. one tried to get crazy on me last night. he got the jump, i missed third gear, put it back in, and still killed him. oh but wait.... he can outhandle me huh |
QUOTE |
So handling and fuel efficiency are important factors for me, but if you 'only' drag race, then enjoy your lack of using your car |
QUOTE (AdmStng @ Mar 31 2003, 02:08 PM) |
here was my car.. CLICK |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 04:10 PM) | ||
right on man... if i had a host id put up pictures of my stangs..... but i dont |
QUOTE (jasonmvt @ Mar 31 2003, 03:10 PM) | ||
once again Mage, you hide behind justifying your response as 'it is my innocent opinion' and then proceed to bash at its conclusion. Stand behind your statements; don't use the passive-agressive stance to try and prove your point. I would think that a conversation that has shifted towards street racing would be the wrong place to jab about a, "lack of using your car." |
QUOTE |
However I'll let this thread go, as I have better things to do than argue over writing style. |
QUOTE (toykilla @ Mar 31 2003, 03:06 PM) |
2003 nissan 350z |
QUOTE (loai @ Mar 31 2003, 08:38 PM) |
You boys playing with your little toy cars. Try a 1999 Mitsubishi 3000 GT VR4 Twin Turbo. I guarantee you it will take on all of you guy's is Civic's |
QUOTE (hedstrosity @ Mar 31 2003, 05:00 PM) |
RIGHT CLICK, SAVE AS good video |