Post by: Xbox-Scene on June 14, 2011, 05:36:00 PM
| As always with a new C4E iXtreme release (iXtreme LT v1.9 for Samsung and LT+ v1.9 for Benq and phat Lite-On), Team Jungle also comes with a new version of JungleFlasher to add full support for the new firmwares. What's new/fixed: * LT 1.9 Sammy & LT Plus 1.9 Benq and Liteon(phat) * KeyDB -Export to .csv file -Import/Merge from .csv file Official Site: http://www.jungleflasher.net Download: here |
Post by: TheRat on June 14, 2011, 06:42:00 PM
Post by: Snowy87 on June 14, 2011, 07:23:00 PM
QUOTE(TheRat @ Jun 15 2011, 01:42 AM) 
nice..
I love you people.
Post by: iJunaid on June 14, 2011, 07:48:00 PM
Post by: DARKFiB3R on June 14, 2011, 07:50:00 PM
Post by: klbarnes1 on June 14, 2011, 08:50:00 PM
This post has been edited by klbarnes1: Jun 15 2011, 03:50 AM
Post by: acaballerob on June 14, 2011, 09:10:00 PM
Firmware Osig: [PLDS DG-16D2S 0251]
Firmware is: LT-Plus 1.9
Spoofing Target
DVD Key copied to target
Target is LT - ID strings not copied to Target
JF 1.83 extracts correctly and can spoof information correctly.
Post by: mik30 on June 14, 2011, 09:10:00 PM
QUOTE(klbarnes1 @ Jun 15 2011, 04:50 AM)
Ok guys quick ?. My lite phat is saying its 73450C but when I load the LT1.9 it says its 025??? I went ahead & flashed it. Should I be ok?
That´s a good question.
Especially regarding the fact that the serial number of the source drive is not copied over to the target drive. So all drives that use this 025 firmware will have the same serial: Easy way for M$ to check and detect. I see the next ban wave coming...
Post by: tomgreen99200 on June 14, 2011, 09:26:00 PM
QUOTE(iJunaid @ Jun 14 2011, 09:48 PM)
Should we update our 360s to the latest Xbox 360 OTA update or should we flash our drives first then update?
Flash back to stock, make the update, and then flash to LT+1.9.
Post by: 4DoorITR on June 14, 2011, 09:36:00 PM
QUOTE(acaballerob @ Jun 14 2011, 10:10 PM)
Guys, JF has a bug with the drive serial info. It can't extract correctly from the 0251 and if you have your dummy/OFW, it can't spoof the drive serial information.
Firmware Osig: [PLDS DG-16D2S 0251]
Firmware is: LT-Plus 1.9
Spoofing Target
DVD Key copied to target
Target is LT - ID strings not copied to Target
JF 1.83 extracts correctly and can spoof information correctly.
So do we need to update then redump the drive to get calibration and serial data that can be copied to the 1.9 firmware? Or is it really a bug and we should be able to use the original stock firmware that the drive came with?
Post by: XBOX360NYMODING on June 14, 2011, 10:11:00 PM
Post by: rulevoid_ on June 14, 2011, 10:27:00 PM
QUOTE(tomgreen99200 @ Jun 14 2011, 10:26 PM)
Flash back to stock, make the update, and then flash to LT+1.9.
Do you have a reputable source for that suggestion? Not being mean just curious.
Post by: Rammieone on June 15, 2011, 01:05:00 AM
Post by: cypher21 on June 15, 2011, 01:26:00 AM
QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:10 AM)
That´s a good question.
Especially regarding the fact that the serial number of the source drive is not copied over to the target drive. So all drives that use this 025 firmware will have the same serial: Easy way for M$ to check and detect. I see the next ban wave coming...
Don't talk about stuff you know jack sh*t about
MS made this new 0251 firmware, and removed all barcode and serial info from it.
so LT 1.9 acts the same way.
There's no 7, 8 or 9xxx lite-on anymore, all are 02510c now and all have the same barcode and serial data
It's recommended to redump (for lite-on only PMT/probe3 or MRA works now) but if you still use your old dummy that barcode and serial info is NOT copied to the new 0251 based 1.9 firmware (as it's not in the stock 0251 also anymore)
edit:
it's recommended to flash back to stock before updating, and redump after update
If you don't have the tools or you're lazy you can choose not to and risk it, that's up to you!!
There are no signs of stuff logged during the update as far as i know, but MS also never flashed drives with an update before too!
Post by: alexthegr824 on June 15, 2011, 03:59:00 AM
Post by: joe90 on June 15, 2011, 05:17:00 AM
1) reflashed with stock FW
2) updated.
3) reflashed with 1.9
4) All fine.. can connect to live etc etc, secdata still clean
Took 10 mins (bar the update), had to reboot the pc three times
Thanks for all the effort.
Post by: kronas on June 15, 2011, 05:35:00 AM
Post by: bucky006 on June 15, 2011, 05:43:00 AM
Thanks
Bucky
Post by: pv3nomq on June 15, 2011, 06:23:00 AM
QUOTE(kronas @ Jun 15 2011, 05:35 AM)
apologies if this is a noob question but what will the diffarence be between LT 1.9 and LT 2.0 ?
The difference between the two is 1.9 will let us play online with new dash update WITHOUT new disc format for now... 2.0 (when released) will let us play our backups of upcoming games that will contain the new disc format.
Hope this helps...
Post by: old_soul on June 15, 2011, 07:24:00 AM
Post by: LightningStruckMyXbox on June 15, 2011, 07:32:00 AM
QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 05:24 AM)
Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned. It has been stated hundreds of times.... When the update came, I simply played ONLINE with originals on my non-modded system...didn't have a pressing rush for 1.9/2.0.
want a cookie?
Post by: 360fan123 on June 15, 2011, 08:00:00 AM
QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 02:24 PM) 
Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned.
I agree with you there, but who cares, it's their problem.
Post by: pv3nomq on June 15, 2011, 08:13:00 AM
QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 07:24 AM)
Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned. It has been stated hundreds of times.... When the update came, I simply played ONLINE with originals on my non-modded system...didn't have a pressing rush for 1.9/2.0.
QUOTE(360fan123 @ Jun 15 2011, 08:00 AM)
I agree with you there, but who cares, it's their problem.
Comments like that, and if thats the way you kind of people feel then this isnt the place for you. This is our choice, get off these threads and dont worry about it. We dont need to hear it. Now run along and play.
Post by: old_soul on June 15, 2011, 08:34:00 AM
QUOTE(LightningStruckMyXbox @ Jun 15 2011, 08:32 AM)
want a cookie?
Sure, oreo will do
Post by: mik30 on June 15, 2011, 08:36:00 AM
QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)
Don't talk about stuff you know jack sh*t about
Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)
MS made this new 0251 firmware,
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)
and removed all barcode and serial info from it.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.
Post by: radoman on June 15, 2011, 08:51:00 AM
QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:36 PM)
Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.
Well, I redumped my liteon via mra after the update last night. When I spoofed source(full new ofw) to the target (liteon lt1.9). JF said serial data not copied - already matches. This means the serial data is now the same on all fat liteons. You will only need the drive key.
Post by: lrod2344 on June 15, 2011, 08:58:00 AM
QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:36 PM)
Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.
I for one dont know WHAT M$ does.... I have neither the tools nor the expertise to even find out.... I DO KNOW however that C4E and the whole Jungle Team put ALOT of time AND effort into these CFWs and the testing as I understand is furious.... that being said I dont think they would overlook something like the barcode and serial info.... if the new OFW inserts a "universal" 025 FW then Im sure thats why LT+ 1.9 also has this....I COULD be wrong but I also understand the risks involved and accept them....
I can also confirm that I did 6 consoles of varying drives (4 LiteOns and 2 BenQs) last night and used various methods... Updated first then reflashed.... flashed first then updated.... used Jungle Flasher as well as DOSFLASH and all have been sucessful thus far..... however you ABSOLUTELY MUST HAVE YOUR DVD KEY.... So the absolute BEST and safest method would be to re-read your current FW and save the Drive Key FIRST and FOREMOST.... once you are sure you have the correct key then go ahead and flash to stock first then update console then flash LT+ 1.9.... I have a LiteOn test drive that I use in place of ANY LiteOn drive as they are so sensitive.... I actually bricked one the first time around last night in windows so I HAD to use DOSFLASH to flash 1.9 and it worked like a charm
Post by: falcon3601 on June 15, 2011, 10:11:00 AM
Post by: Obveron on June 15, 2011, 10:55:00 AM
Out of curiosity, can the traditional dvdkey method of reading the key from phat liteons (solder serial db9 with max 3232 chip) still be accomplished AFTER the drive has been flashed with the new OFW?
Post by: micro23 on June 15, 2011, 01:25:00 PM
QUOTE(Obveron @ Jun 15 2011, 04:55 PM)
Of course, any 360 drive can play any orginals, including xgd3. And when LT 2.0 comes out it will play xgd3 backups. Samsung drives can't respond to AP 2.5 challenges. In that regard, they are blessed. For samsung owners, you don't need to reburn your games every time MS updates the challenges.
Out of curiosity, can the traditional dvdkey method of reading the key from phat liteons (solder serial db9 with max 3232 chip) still be accomplished AFTER the drive has been flashed with the new OFW?
This is also my question. Can you take an old fat liteon, never flash it.... update it then retrieve the key and flash it with the latest firmware?
Thanks for the hard work everyone.
Post by: donbutta on June 15, 2011, 02:17:00 PM
QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 10:36 AM) 
Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.
what are you not getting dump an original un modded o251c firmware from different drives and they all return the same serial and id strings
all JF does is mimic that same process their is no bug
do some research
here in caps THEIRS NO NEED FOR THE SERIAL DATA BECAUSE ALL ORIGINAL FIRMWARE NOW HAVE THE SAME DATA
Post by: RRoD420 on June 15, 2011, 02:39:00 PM
QUOTE(micro23 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:25 PM)
This is also my question. Can you take an old fat liteon, never flash it.... update it then retrieve the key and flash it with the latest firmware?
Thanks for the hard work everyone.
process hasn't changed, jungleflasher was updated to support everything new.
Post by: krizalid on June 15, 2011, 03:05:00 PM
QUOTE(rulevoid_ @ Jun 14 2011, 11:27 PM)
QUOTE(tomgreen99200 @ Jun 14 2011 @ 10:26 PM)
Flash back to stock, make the update, and then flash to LT+1.9.
Do you have a reputable source for that suggestion? Not being mean just curious.
Funniest post ever!!!
Can this get any better? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/jester.gif)
This post has been edited by krizalid: Jun 15 2011, 10:08 PM
Post by: tomgreen99200 on June 15, 2011, 04:37:00 PM
QUOTE(krizalid @ Jun 15 2011, 05:05 PM)
Do you have a reputable source for that suggestion? Not being mean just curious.
Funniest post ever!!!
Can this get any better?
Post by: iateshaggy on June 15, 2011, 04:45:00 PM
Post by: s3cur1tr0n on June 15, 2011, 08:57:00 PM
has anybody "married" a samsung or old hitachi to a system that normally has a drive that supports ap25?
wish i could read the nand and see if it now says the new drive, but i aint going to sacrifice a jtag
This post has been edited by s3cur1tr0n: Jun 16 2011, 03:59 AM
Post by: tomgreen99200 on June 16, 2011, 12:49:00 PM
QUOTE(s3cur1tr0n @ Jun 15 2011, 10:57 PM)
I flashed a benq that was spoofed as an ms28 back to stock benq with correct key, updated to latest dash and then put lt 1.9 on the benq not spoofed and it plays games with bad ap25 no problem
has anybody "married" a samsung or old hitachi to a system that normally has a drive that supports ap25?
wish i could read the nand and see if it now says the new drive, but i aint going to sacrifice a jtag
hopefully you dont care about LIVE or are already banned.