Post by: Shawn_ on September 12, 2005, 11:39:00 AM
discuss....
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 11:55:00 AM
Post by: KAGE360 on September 12, 2005, 11:57:00 AM
with developers making strides with game development like this, I can see how MS is targeting TV shows like american idol to spread the game market.
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 12:02:00 PM
they dont allow img linking
Post by: KAGE360 on September 12, 2005, 12:17:00 PM
QUOTE(Deftech @ Sep 12 2005, 02:13 PM)
thats a LOT of people in that crowd, and just 1 corner?!
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: VariableElite on September 12, 2005, 12:22:00 PM
-
Post by: VariableElite on September 12, 2005, 12:22:00 PM
QUOTE(Deftech @ Sep 12 2005, 01:13 PM)
thats a LOT of people in that crowd, and just 1 corner?!
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: mastersloth on September 12, 2005, 12:24:00 PM
-
That alot of people
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 12:26:00 PM
-
Post by: mastersloth on September 12, 2005, 12:24:00 PM
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 12:26:00 PM
QUOTE(VariableElite @ Sep 12 2005, 02:33 PM)
You know, if you're running a real browser (say, Firefox?), you can right-click on "user-posted image" and hit View Image to see the pic... 
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 01:08:00 PM
-
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Infamous_One on September 12, 2005, 01:13:00 PM
-
yeah yeah , but you will never see that amount of spectators in the game , its already laggy with a couple of players , imagine how laggy it would be with 8 racers and 40 spectators.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 12, 2005, 01:25:00 PM
-
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 01:08:00 PM
Post by: Infamous_One on September 12, 2005, 01:13:00 PM
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 12, 2005, 01:25:00 PM
QUOTE(Infamous_One @ Sep 12 2005, 03:24 PM)
yeah yeah , but you will never see that amount of spectators in the game , its already laggy with a couple of players , imagine how laggy it would be with 8 racers and 40 spectators.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 12, 2005, 01:52:00 PM
-
Hey, GFX whores like me and Deftech give a shit about the number of spectators. It has been stated before, but we are the type that wreck all the time when we get a new race game because we are busy staring at the scenery. I have drove off so many cliffs in Rallisport 2 on xbox and in WRC 4 on PS2.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 01:55:00 PM
-
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 12, 2005, 01:52:00 PM
QUOTE(miggidy @ Sep 12 2005, 03:52 PM)
It's a racing video game,
who gives a shit about the number of spectators in a game world?
That's like someone whining about the low number of palm trees in the background of a fighting game's Hawaii stage.
who gives a shit about the number of spectators in a game world?
That's like someone whining about the low number of palm trees in the background of a fighting game's Hawaii stage.
Hey, GFX whores like me and Deftech give a shit about the number of spectators. It has been stated before, but we are the type that wreck all the time when we get a new race game because we are busy staring at the scenery. I have drove off so many cliffs in Rallisport 2 on xbox and in WRC 4 on PS2.
Post by: Deftech on September 12, 2005, 01:55:00 PM
QUOTE(deftonesmx17 @ Sep 12 2005, 04:03 PM)
Hey, GFX whores like me and Deftech give a shit about the number of spectators. It has been stated before, but we are the type that wreck all the time when we get a new race game because we are busy staring at the scenery. I have drove off so many cliffs in Rallisport 2 on xbox and in WRC 4 on PS2.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 12, 2005, 02:52:00 PM
-
and thanks deftech the pic really impressed me.
i was mistaken that they had 35000 being able to view a reace on GothamTV, but the news cleared things up, still great news
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: irajames1176 on September 14, 2005, 12:38:00 AM
-
Yay next gen equals thousands of cardboard cutout looking spectators, as opposed to this gens hundred or so cardboard cutout looking spectators...me i can care less about spectators also, i just want the cars and scenery to kick ass...now if they did full polygon characters for spectators then i'd be impressed until then they get a whoopdee doo from me
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Heet on September 14, 2005, 01:01:00 AM
-
Saying that, im still more excited about this game than ANY other, save maybe Airforce. Still cant wait to see what that looks like running!
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: crobar on September 14, 2005, 07:07:00 AM
-
you two blind?
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 14, 2005, 07:29:00 AM
-
Post by: KAGE360 on September 12, 2005, 02:52:00 PM
and thanks deftech the pic really impressed me.
i was mistaken that they had 35000 being able to view a reace on GothamTV, but the news cleared things up, still great news
Post by: irajames1176 on September 14, 2005, 12:38:00 AM
Post by: Heet on September 14, 2005, 01:01:00 AM
Saying that, im still more excited about this game than ANY other, save maybe Airforce. Still cant wait to see what that looks like running!
Post by: crobar on September 14, 2005, 07:07:00 AM
Post by: deftonesmx17 on September 14, 2005, 07:29:00 AM
QUOTE(crobar @ Sep 14 2005, 09:18 AM)
you two blind?
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 14, 2005, 09:01:00 AM
-
Heres the article again if you decided to reply without reading it(90% of you Im sure)....
http://www.bizarreon...omments=1&id=53
35,000 or 3,500 or 350, I dont give a shit. Cool test and I'll take any pGR 3 related news I can get my hands on.
You people looked at the upper right and upper left of the pic and saw all the other crowd members didnt you? its not just the bottom left area thats filled. You fill a city with fully animated crowds and the game takes on a slightly more realistic feel, and for some thats a nice little accomplishment.
I just hope they dont get in my way when I pull over and stare at buildings. If I see bastards jumping and they get in my way......
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: mathias on September 14, 2005, 09:06:00 AM
-
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 14, 2005, 09:17:00 AM
-
Post by: Deftech on September 14, 2005, 09:01:00 AM
Heres the article again if you decided to reply without reading it(90% of you Im sure)....
http://www.bizarreon...omments=1&id=53
35,000 or 3,500 or 350, I dont give a shit. Cool test and I'll take any pGR 3 related news I can get my hands on.
You people looked at the upper right and upper left of the pic and saw all the other crowd members didnt you? its not just the bottom left area thats filled. You fill a city with fully animated crowds and the game takes on a slightly more realistic feel, and for some thats a nice little accomplishment.
I just hope they dont get in my way when I pull over and stare at buildings. If I see bastards jumping and they get in my way......
Post by: mathias on September 14, 2005, 09:06:00 AM
Post by: Deftech on September 14, 2005, 09:17:00 AM
QUOTE(mathias @ Sep 14 2005, 11:17 AM)
if I can't hit, drive over, or shoot any of the spectators then I don't care if there are none...
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: incognegro on September 14, 2005, 12:54:00 PM
-
. Im sorry am i thinking out loud? 
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 14, 2005, 02:57:00 PM
-
Post by: incognegro on September 14, 2005, 12:54:00 PM
. Im sorry am i thinking out loud?
Post by: KAGE360 on September 14, 2005, 02:57:00 PM
QUOTE(incognegro @ Sep 14 2005, 03:05 PM)
if they can get that many characters onscreen at one time without a performance hit, then "certain games" that only has two characters onscreen at once fighting each other should be looking WAY more impressive right now.......... . Im sorry am i thinking out loud?
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 09:09:00 AM
-
. Im sorry am i thinking out loud? Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 09:09:00 AM
QUOTE(jaskerzada006 @ Sep 15 2005, 11:17 AM)
I'v seen the game running at 1080 and have to say that I still agree with Incognegro. Maybe my expectations are too high, but it's not a far enough leap from Ultimate to make me nut my pants(the same way Ultimate affected me.)
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: jaskerzada006 on September 15, 2005, 09:15:00 AM
-
It was a presentation prepared by Tecmo. Art style and graphical quality are two different things. The art style of DOA2 was intentional....but was the graphical quallity? If so, why was it remade twice?
So yea, put DOAU on 1080 and you've got DOA4.(Visually that is.)
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 10:11:00 AM
-
Post by: jaskerzada006 on September 15, 2005, 09:15:00 AM
QUOTE
how far along was the game when you saw it and what did you see it on? your pc or an actual HDTV? if you saw it not too long ago then what is it about the game that doesnt look next gen to you? i dont see what the problem people have with the game other then the art style that most dont realize is intentional.
It was a presentation prepared by Tecmo. Art style and graphical quality are two different things. The art style of DOA2 was intentional....but was the graphical quallity? If so, why was it remade twice?
So yea, put DOAU on 1080 and you've got DOA4.(Visually that is.)
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 10:11:00 AM
QUOTE(jaskerzada006 @ Sep 15 2005, 11:26 AM)
It was a presentation prepared by Tecmo. Art style and graphical quality are two different things. The art style of DOA2 was intentional....but was the graphical quallity? If so, why was it remade twice?
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: jaskerzada006 on September 15, 2005, 11:01:00 AM
-
Ok, first off, the video I saw was probably the same shown at e3, and it was shortly after e3, but I don't have to prove shit, what I have done and seen is of no concern of you.
Second, DOA2 Hardcore on ps2 was not a "port". I agree that it was better on DC, but that doesn't mean Hardcore was a "port."
Third, if some tech data was released, which it won't be, not never, you probably wouldn't know what it ment anyways. If your primary source for tech info is off of an xbox forum, then your screwed. The whole point is that polys and textures only get minor upgrades because of the demand of making the game in HD resolutions.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 11:18:00 AM
-
Post by: jaskerzada006 on September 15, 2005, 11:01:00 AM
QUOTE
what presentation? at E3 or now at the TGS? and you didnt answer how you viewed the presentation.
also how was DoA2 remade twice? it was ported to the ps2 which looked like ass and then remade to the xbox, a port and remake are two different things.
how can you make that kind of assumption about DoAU in 1080? i remember twisted posting pics comparing the two games and there is worlds of difference. there is more to a games visuals then screen rez. there is texture rez, poly count, animation, and the scope of the arenas to consider as well. i wish itagaki would put out the technical data on the game compared to DoAU so the naysayers *ahem* jasker *ahem* would have their eyes opened to how much of a leap this game really is.
also how was DoA2 remade twice? it was ported to the ps2 which looked like ass and then remade to the xbox, a port and remake are two different things.
how can you make that kind of assumption about DoAU in 1080? i remember twisted posting pics comparing the two games and there is worlds of difference. there is more to a games visuals then screen rez. there is texture rez, poly count, animation, and the scope of the arenas to consider as well. i wish itagaki would put out the technical data on the game compared to DoAU so the naysayers *ahem* jasker *ahem* would have their eyes opened to how much of a leap this game really is.
Ok, first off, the video I saw was probably the same shown at e3, and it was shortly after e3, but I don't have to prove shit, what I have done and seen is of no concern of you.
Second, DOA2 Hardcore on ps2 was not a "port". I agree that it was better on DC, but that doesn't mean Hardcore was a "port."
Third, if some tech data was released, which it won't be, not never, you probably wouldn't know what it ment anyways. If your primary source for tech info is off of an xbox forum, then your screwed. The whole point is that polys and textures only get minor upgrades because of the demand of making the game in HD resolutions.
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 11:18:00 AM
QUOTE(jaskerzada006 @ Sep 15 2005, 01:12 PM)
Ok, first off, the video I saw was probably the same shown at e3, and it was shortly after e3, but I don't have to prove shit, what I have done and seen is of no concern of you.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 11:34:00 AM
-
is the argument here whether or not the shitty as ps2 version of DOA 2 was a port or remake?
does someone think it was made from the ground up and was Not a port?
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 11:40:00 AM
-
well really the debate here is about DoA4 and the nonbeliever saying its only a high rez version of DOAU.
DoA2 was braught up because he said it was remade twice and im trying to tell him it was only remade once (on xbox) and that the ps2 version was a port.
read the last id say 6 posts from both of us if you want a good laugh. i like how hes quite mute right now, maybe collecting his thoughts about my last reply.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 12:00:00 PM
-
for this one, thats IF I can stop watching all the videos from TGS!
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 12:05:00 PM
-
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 11:34:00 AM
does someone think it was made from the ground up and was Not a port?
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 11:40:00 AM
DoA2 was braught up because he said it was remade twice and im trying to tell him it was only remade once (on xbox) and that the ps2 version was a port.
read the last id say 6 posts from both of us if you want a good laugh. i like how hes quite mute right now, maybe collecting his thoughts about my last reply.
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 12:00:00 PM
for this one, thats IF I can stop watching all the videos from TGS!Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 12:05:00 PM
QUOTE(Deftech @ Sep 15 2005, 02:11 PM)
I need to get the for this one, thats IF I can stop watching all the videos from TGS!
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 12:09:00 PM
-
ahh I see, so now the 360s processor is crap and its simply a xbox 180 or xbox 1.5?
youre a real gem
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 12:27:00 PM
-
for this one, thats IF I can stop watching all the videos from TGS!Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 12:09:00 PM
youre a real gem
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 12:27:00 PM
QUOTE(jaskerzada006 @ Sep 15 2005, 02:19 PM)
That's cool man, I guess you'll figure it out about a year into 360. In the mean time, you can have this thread.
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 02:37:00 PM
-
im gone for a while hoping to have some kind of reply from the gem and i get nothing. i kept my facts straight and didnt beat around the bush in any respect. but now hes going to talk like he knows facts which he doesnt care to prove his credibility.
to me beauts like him are nothing more then sony whores who live in their basement and act like they know what diarrhea they spew up.
You dont know what a port is, dont know how the next gen systems work, and dont know how to back up your claims and again you say i dont know about games???
but again im still waiting for a reply because until your weak closing argument i was having fun there for a while.
if not checkmate then
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 02:53:00 PM
-
-
Title: Pgr# 35000 People
Post by: incognegro on September 16, 2005, 08:58:00 AM
-
Post by: KAGE360 on September 15, 2005, 02:37:00 PM
im gone for a while hoping to have some kind of reply from the gem and i get nothing. i kept my facts straight and didnt beat around the bush in any respect. but now hes going to talk like he knows facts which he doesnt care to prove his credibility.
to me beauts like him are nothing more then sony whores who live in their basement and act like they know what diarrhea they spew up.
You dont know what a port is, dont know how the next gen systems work, and dont know how to back up your claims and again you say i dont know about games???
but again im still waiting for a reply because until your weak closing argument i was having fun there for a while.
if not checkmate then
Post by: Deftech on September 15, 2005, 02:53:00 PM
Post by: incognegro on September 16, 2005, 08:58:00 AM