Post by: dss311 on August 30, 2004, 11:20:00 PM
Post by: thomes08 on August 30, 2004, 11:32:00 PM
"Had we to do it over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success, being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day" Bush said
or somebody who, you know, is smart
ok now we have both sides lets end this thread it's stupid we already have a couple liek thsi going and this is just old stuff
thomes08
Post by: dss311 on August 30, 2004, 11:46:00 PM
| QUOTE (thomes08 @ Aug 31 2004, 07:35 AM) |
| couple liek thsi going and this is just old stuff |
Is this english? (or just a typo)
Thomes08,
Since you have seen a lot of political photos, here is one you may not have seen yet:
Sorry if you have seen this one as well. I am not privy to what you have seen or not seen.
DSS311
Post by: Intensecure on August 31, 2004, 01:25:00 AM
),Registrant:
X-S Productions Int.
Egyptenarnstr 1
Brussels, Brussels 1050
BE
0032486516043
Domain Name: XBOX-SCENE.COM
Perhaps you should have titled the post "who would you rather see running the USA"?
Please remember, not everyone is American
Post by: gcskate27 on August 31, 2004, 04:07:00 AM
GO BUSH!!!
Post by: nemt on August 31, 2004, 06:56:00 AM
| QUOTE (gcskate27 @ Aug 31 2004, 08:10 AM) |
| youre right dss311... it does all come down to photo-ops with footballs... GO BUSH!!! |
The football represents a great issue between the two candidates. John Kerry is clearly out of touch with the average american.
Post by: pegasys on August 31, 2004, 08:07:00 AM
Post by: brandogg on August 31, 2004, 10:00:00 AM
Post by: dss311 on August 31, 2004, 10:03:00 AM
| QUOTE (Intensecure @ Aug 31 2004, 09:28 AM) |
| Actually, since this is an "International" website/forum, with many Canadian moderators including the head moderator (I believe HSDEMONZ lives in Canada?), and this website is registered in Belgium (you know, that place next to France ), Registrant: |
I like your style Intensecure. You have valid points and well written thoughts in all your posts!
Post by: pegasys on August 31, 2004, 10:04:00 AM
Post by: dss311 on August 31, 2004, 10:26:00 AM
| QUOTE |
| We can eithyermove foward backwards or stay the same, whould you have someone who will either make us stay the same or move foward(Kerry), or someone who is guarenteed to pull us back even farther(Bush). |
And what specifically has Kerry done during his terms as Senator that make you think he will be a good leader? He only shows up to about 24% of his public intelligence hearings. (Source)
What policy/amendment/law has Kerry proposed while being a senator that you feel represents your views? Anything? Or are you just always "anti-bush" no matter what the president does.
It is a sorry excuse (and irresponsible) when you vote for "anyone" that is running agaisnt Bush because you dislike him when you do not know anything about the other candidate.
Educate yourself on all the candidates and then make a Wise & Responsible vote for the leader of OUR COUNTRY.
Post by: pegasys on August 31, 2004, 10:55:00 AM
Post by: Intensecure on August 31, 2004, 10:58:00 AM
Post by: thomes08 on August 31, 2004, 04:45:00 PM
| QUOTE (dss311 @ Aug 31 2004, 06:29 PM) |
| And what specifically has Kerry done during his terms as Senator that make you think he will be a good leader? He only shows up to about 24% of his public intelligence hearings. (Source) What policy/amendment/law has Kerry proposed while being a senator that you feel represents your views? Anything? Or are you just always "anti-bush" no matter what the president does. It is a sorry excuse (and irresponsible) when you vote for "anyone" that is running agaisnt Bush because you dislike him when you do not know anything about the other candidate. Educate yourself on all the candidates and then make a Wise & Responsible vote for the leader of OUR COUNTRY. |
what do you m ean by done nothing? Just cause he didn't propose and ammandment banning gay marriages doesn't mean he didn't do anything. Speaking of doing nothing, what good has bush done?
If you want to talk stupid facts how bout the number of vacation days has Bush taken? Where was he when he should have beed at his post in the national gaurd. This man doesn't show up for work either. The only this i like about that is when he doesn't shot up to work he doesn't fuck anything up.
oh, and to whoever commented on my first post, if you couldn't figure it out there are 2 instances where two letters are switched. It's really not as bad as you're making it out, it's an abvious typo from fast tyoing.
And it's not dumb to vote somebody out of office just to do so. If you couldn't agree more with the president, then why not vote kerry? If you don't like your employees work, fire him. If you'd ratehr have a piece of plastic as president, then why settle with the person who made you feel that way? Voting isn't just about hiring someone, it's about firing someone as well (if they'er up for reelection)
thomes08
Post by: Xboxmodder3690 on August 31, 2004, 05:18:00 PM
Post by: The unProfessional on August 31, 2004, 06:20:00 PM
Post by: thomes08 on August 31, 2004, 06:50:00 PM
Post by: dss311 on September 02, 2004, 11:58:00 AM
First is was Christopher Reeves
Then
Shaquile O'neal
And Now George Bush.
Oh well what the heck......
SuperMan George Bush 2004!!
Post by: dss311 on September 12, 2004, 11:33:00 PM
Ok, Who makes a better First Couple?
Post by: The unProfessional on September 12, 2004, 11:34:00 PM
Post by: dss311 on September 12, 2004, 11:37:00 PM
Post by: The unProfessional on September 12, 2004, 11:38:00 PM
ebert and roeper then...
Post by: EverythingButAnAnswer on September 13, 2004, 12:54:00 AM
Post by: MrWizdumb on September 13, 2004, 03:21:00 PM
Post by: nemt on September 13, 2004, 03:27:00 PM
Post by: 67thRaptorBull on September 13, 2004, 03:34:00 PM
| QUOTE (MrWizdumb @ Sep 13 2004, 05:24 PM) |
| wouldnt believe someone would be ignorant enough to decide on a president based on stupid fotos. but i'll sink to ur level for a second.. |
i like it
Post by: gcskate27 on September 13, 2004, 03:36:00 PM
Post by: 67thRaptorBull on September 13, 2004, 06:31:00 PM
| QUOTE (nemt @ Sep 13 2004, 05:30 PM) |
| |
wtf is that suppose to be?
Post by: Maximumbeing on September 13, 2004, 06:53:00 PM
Just like in real life.
Post by: pug_ster on September 13, 2004, 07:03:00 PM
| QUOTE (Maximumbeing @ Sep 14 2004, 02:56 AM) |
| George W. Bush is obviously the Emperor of China, and he's using some sort of phallic arm to assault John Kerry. Just like in real life. |
For a moment there I thought Bush was the President of the United States, but obviously you prove me wrong.
Post by: Maximumbeing on September 13, 2004, 07:08:00 PM
Post by: 67thRaptorBull on September 13, 2004, 07:37:00 PM
| QUOTE (Maximumbeing @ Sep 13 2004, 09:11 PM) |
| I'm hoping that's sarcasm, but I wouldn't put it past anyone on this forum to lack in the reading department. |
yea, theres some here that dont know what sarcasm is
Post by: dss311 on September 14, 2004, 10:52:00 AM
| QUOTE |
| wouldnt believe someone would be ignorant enough to decide on a president based on stupid fotos. but i'll sink to ur level for a second.. |
A photo "captured" at the begining of a ceremony is not quite the same as a "dopey looking" Kerry. We can all see the Bush photo was snapped seconds before he was to place his hand over his heart. (You really don't think the president forgot where his heart is now do you?) The Kerry photos are taken in his normal flattering posture. But Hey, I can show some Kerry photos taken out of context as well.....
More photo opps for Kerry
Post by: pug_ster on September 14, 2004, 11:23:00 AM
| QUOTE (hardcoregamer @ Sep 14 2004, 07:08 AM) |
| Im just wondering how George Bush messed up this country? I am not seeing it anywhere. Maybe the Bush haters hate Bush because they are told to, I have asked many people why they hate G.W. no one can come up with a reason. So i ask it here, why do the Bush haters hate Bush? It certanly isnt the economy, its booming, unemployment is lower than it has been in decades. Hell when Clinton won reelection he won it on the unemployment numbers which were higher than they are now. Its not taxes, they are lower than they have been for a long time. The war on terror? Well that is a possibility, but i guess 9/11/01 never happened either did it? Find something REAL and ill listen. otherwise you are just blowing smoke. |
Since you wanted to talk about employment...
When you are unemployed, you are collecting unemployment checks from the government thus you are part of the 5.4% of the unemployed. However, when your unemployment runs out, you no longer receive checks from the government, thus, you are NOT part of the 5.4% unemployed. And you offically dropped out from the workforce.
The problem is that after 9/11 many people was unemployed. They became unemployed for 6 months to a year and then dropped out from the workforce because they are unable to find a job.
And the thing is that the amount of people in the workforce today was actually less when Bush took office. The last time when the amount of workforce decreased during a president's administration was Hoover in the 1930's Depression.
Post by: Maximumbeing on September 14, 2004, 01:49:00 PM
That man represents our country, I find it offensive that he can't even speak English.
Post by: Baner on September 14, 2004, 01:50:00 PM
Post by: Maximumbeing on September 14, 2004, 01:55:00 PM
Post by: MrWizdumb on September 14, 2004, 06:14:00 PM
| QUOTE (hardcoregamer @ Sep 14 2004, 12:08 AM) |
| Im just wondering how George Bush messed up this country? I am not seeing it anywhere. Maybe the Bush haters hate Bush because they are told to, I have asked many people why they hate G.W. no one can come up with a reason. So i ask it here, why do the Bush haters hate Bush? It certanly isnt the economy, its booming, unemployment is lower than it has been in decades. Hell when Clinton won reelection he won it on the unemployment numbers which were higher than they are now. Its not taxes, they are lower than they have been for a long time. The war on terror? Well that is a possibility, but i guess 9/11/01 never happened either did it? Find something REAL and ill listen. otherwise you are just blowing smoke. |
dunno what would incline anyone to necessarily to "hate" W. i am against him yes, but i dont want his head on a stake or something. yes we all know 9/11 happened so quit putting words in liberal's mouths saying we'd rather do nothing to get revenge on the "terrorists." the prime argument, of mine anyways, is why sink to their level and kill their civilians as they did to ours (hypocrisy?). yes i'm pissed as much as you, but any dumbfuck can kill, we need an alternate solution. out of pure honesty, do you think if osama bin laden is captured or whatever, terrorism will be nonexistant? i'll agree with you on something tho, ppl should oppose bush on something that makes sense, not just funny pics, etc.
Post by: 67thRaptorBull on September 14, 2004, 07:54:00 PM
| QUOTE (hardcoregamer @ Sep 14 2004, 01:08 AM) |
| Im just wondering how George Bush messed up this country? I am not seeing it anywhere. Maybe the Bush haters hate Bush because they are told to, I have asked many people why they hate G.W. no one can come up with a reason. So i ask it here, why do the Bush haters hate Bush? It certanly isnt the economy, its booming, unemployment is lower than it has been in decades. Hell when Clinton won reelection he won it on the unemployment numbers which were higher than they are now. Its not taxes, they are lower than they have been for a long time. The war on terror? Well that is a possibility, but i guess 9/11/01 never happened either did it? Find something REAL and ill listen. otherwise you are just blowing smoke. |
your joking me right???
unemployment is at a low, and the economy is booming?
where are you living right now, cuase that sure as shit isnt the US
yes, 9/11 did happen, but what the fuck does that have to do with anything right now? Afghan is over (well, its not because weve redirected troops, but it should have been) and we got "terrorism" where it struck us from, what else do you want to contribute to 9/11?
stop using 9/11 as an excuse, or a booster for bush, its not gonna fly. yes, we went and got revenge, but the last time i checked, the 9/11 ordeal was over by may 2002
whats come now is a shitstorm, ie, Iraq, which has nothing, 0%, to do with 9/11
thats why people "hate" bush, because hes going out and attacking "anyone who isnt with us" (your either with us or with the terrorists.........remember that speech??)
terrorism is a very broad term, and what bush is trying to do now in the middle east isnt helping the US one fucking bit, its just pissing off more people to join the so called "terrorist cuase"
i find the whole situation hypocritical
the US is noseing around in the middle east where it shouldnt be (well, not just that, but there taking over parts of the middle east to) and "terrorists" (the ones fighting the US army, not the ones contributed to 9/11, theres a difference here) are trying to make the US leave, but we just regard these people as evil doers and keep fighting the "good fight"
well, fuck, werent we the ones that fought the british once they started to fuck with our land to much, what do you call that? patriotism, well then these terrorists are "patriots" too
do you get my point.....9/11 has no connection to what bush is doing now, bush is just pulling reasons out of his ass to attack people, and thats what hes done wrong
that and domestic issues arent being resolved (you know, the issues that really matter, not some fucking war)
meh, forget my Spelling, im to fast a typer to care
Post by: pegasys on September 15, 2004, 04:51:00 AM
Post by: nemt on September 15, 2004, 07:54:00 AM
Post by: heoko on September 16, 2004, 12:07:00 AM
Hmm... I dont care who I would rather "SEE" I can see Barney and Conan O Brian running our country... That would be hillarious... I can see the Masturbating Bear Giving security reports and Hemmrroid Raymod giving preperation H as whatever donald rumsfeild job is. Then Triumph would be the vice president...
Wait.. These people vote... And in a Democracy EVERYONE runs the country...
but too bad we live in a Democratic Republic...
Post by: 67thRaptorBull on September 16, 2004, 07:48:00 PM
| QUOTE (heoko @ Sep 16 2004, 02:10 AM) |
| but too bad we live in a Democratic Republic... |
Post by: ddkore on September 17, 2004, 07:21:00 PM
fas·cist
NOUN:
1. often Fascist An advocate or adherent of fascism.
2. A reactionary or dictatorial person.
ADJECTIVE:
1. often Fascist Of, advocating, or practicing fascism.
2. Fascist Of or relating to the regime of the Fascisti.
fas·cism
NOUN:
1. often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Definitions courtesy of Yahoo! Reference
Post by: Mr. Chips on September 18, 2004, 07:19:00 AM
| QUOTE |
| suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. |
Bush doesn't need to suppress the opponents, they're doing a good job a supressing themselves with double-talk.
| QUOTE |
| and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism |
and if he's so racist, why are there so many ethnicities on the Bush/Cheney cabinet?
Beligerent nationalism? And how is that different from loving one's country?
Post by: pug_ster on September 18, 2004, 10:51:00 AM
| QUOTE |
| fas·cism NOUN: 1. often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator |
Well, a Commander in thief... err Chief - I would say 50% true.
| QUOTE |
| stringent socioeconomic controls |
Not really true. However, forcing me to pay $10 for 9/11 fee whenever I go to airport counts as 25% true.
| QUOTE |
| suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship |
Let's see, President saying we are fighting a war on terror and foxnews..., then again, we have michael moores and cnn - I would say 75% true.
| QUOTE |
| typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. |
Nationalism, true, racism - Though Bush wouldn't say it but I think Muslims are blamed for terrorist attacks. so 75%
It all adds up to an average of 50%. Hell, if Americans are dumb enough to vote for him so we can be a total fascist by the next 4 years.