xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Uaex  (Read 258 times)

XDelusion

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 970
Uaex
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2004, 10:48:00 AM »

smile.gif

I know it is possibly to Boot AmiThalon off CD, and also to add a Hard Drive image to your Linux partition, and boot it via Lilo, so why could there not be an XBOX boot loader?
Logged

Likklebaer

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 767
Uaex
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2004, 05:25:00 PM »

QUOTE
im pretty satisfied with UAE-X to be honest, so i dont have plans for it...in other words:

<insert standard response here>

"not gonna happen"


Geez lantus, you're really not that hard to please are you?

While UAE-X does play many games, so does DGen, so does SNES9x-X, so does CH3. But all of these emus have been surpassed by more configurable, more compatible, and overall far superior ports. And yet it is to these, now obsolete, emus that UAE-X best compares in terms of its primitive interface and woefully inadequate configuration system. By today's standards it's a dinosaur. A remnant of a forgotten age of Xbox emulation.

Why should not the Amiga be deserving of the same update treatment as emus for so many lesser machines?
Logged

ScHlAuChi

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Uaex
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2004, 07:13:00 PM »

wink.gif

/me runs and hides behind Likklebaer

P.S. What are ur Amiga favs ?
Logged

XDelusion

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 970
Uaex
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2004, 09:58:00 PM »

Are you suggesting that it is THAT EASY to add in FatX support!?!?!??!

Logged

gonkle

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 179
Uaex
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2004, 10:12:00 PM »

I think lantus means that you only have to add 2 Lines to the config file to get hdf to run, or he means  a change in the source that it will boot/show hdf files from the menu.
Logged

lantus

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 297
Uaex
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2004, 04:26:00 PM »

yes they do work , but they are slow..thats the point. Theres an C function call in the XDK  that increases your filesystem cache size from 64k to whatever size you like.

Think of it similar to the old smartdrv.exe DOS command that added caches to your DOS filesystem to improve performance.

it should run much nicer then - any takers?
Logged

0123456

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
Uaex
« Reply #21 on: January 06, 2004, 04:30:00 PM »

biggrin.gif what do you say?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]