Topic: Nkpatcher 9.0 & 10.0 (Read 831 times)

adil786 · « **Reply #15 on:** December 22, 2004, 07:34:00 AM »

when it comes out, is there any advantages using this on a 1.4 box using currently pbl-lite?

thanks

total_ass · « **Reply #16 on:** December 22, 2004, 07:35:00 AM »

adil, read about the shadow C drive in the main nkpatcher topic.

Flame2k · « **Reply #17 on:** December 22, 2004, 08:22:00 AM »

RolfLobker · « **Reply #18 on:** December 22, 2004, 08:43:00 AM »

QUOTE(Angerwound @ Dec 22 2004, 03:47 PM)

Sounds like enough positive results for a release to me. I unfortunately have not had the pleasure to test NK9's LBA48 feature since my upgraded xbox is not here.

adil786 · « **Reply #19 on:** December 22, 2004, 10:47:00 AM »

QUOTE(total_ass @ Dec 22 2004, 04:38 PM)

adil, read about the shadow C drive in the main nkpatcher topic.

krayzie · « **Reply #20 on:** December 22, 2004, 10:52:00 AM »

QUOTE(adil786 @ Dec 22 2004, 07:50 PM)

yo totalass wassup,

EthanHunt_IMF · « **Reply #21 on:** December 22, 2004, 11:50:00 AM »

QUOTE(BlackWar @ Dec 21 2004, 08:11 PM)

hot damn! I was a big fan of nkpatcher, but the only reason why I never used it was because of no lba48....it looks like the bios loaders just became out-dated. If everything is true with nkpatcher, what do you need a bios loader for?

Yuyu · « **Reply #22 on:** December 22, 2004, 04:17:00 PM »

NKpathcher9 + UXE + Kai support in XBE applications have made modchips obsolete for me.

fghjj · « **Reply #23 on:** December 22, 2004, 07:35:00 PM »

QUOTE(Yuyu @ Dec 23 2004, 01:20 AM)

NKpathcher9 + UXE + Kai support in XBE applications have made modchips obsolete for me.

BlackWar · « **Reply #24 on:** December 22, 2004, 08:21:00 PM »

Hey, we all have our own tasts and preferance. Those are not a problem. What a person chooses is their business, but when someone says one is better then the other, then there is a problem. They both have thier strong points and weak points.

garyopa · « **Reply #25 on:** December 23, 2004, 10:51:00 AM »

Will the BUG of no HD cable support be fixed in v9.0?

I tried v8.1 with SVIDEO cable works great. NORMAL cable works great.
Plug in HD cable, and get nothing but WAVY lines on startup.

Any solutions? Or ideas?

chilin_dude · « **Reply #26 on:** December 23, 2004, 12:50:00 PM »

QUOTE(Iriez @ Dec 22 2004, 08:30 AM)

Thought i would let the users know that I've been testing the lba48 (160 gig with nkpatcher 9) and everything appears to be smooth. No data corruption so far...

EthanHunt_IMF · « **Reply #27 on:** December 23, 2004, 01:35:00 PM »

QUOTE(wrayal @ Dec 22 2004, 11:17 PM)

eh. · « **Reply #28 on:** December 23, 2004, 02:57:00 PM »

wrayal's referring to the occasional situation where someone causes their UDE/2/UXE install to stop booting, THEN allows their box's capacitor to drain (so even originals no longer work) eh.

wafflezone · « **Reply #29 on:** December 23, 2004, 09:28:00 PM »

QUOTE(eh. @ Dec 23 2004, 11:28 PM)

wrayal's referring to the occasional situation where someone causes their UDE/2/UXE install to stop booting, THEN allows their box's capacitor to drain (so even originals no longer work) eh.

Author Topic: Nkpatcher 9.0 & 10.0 (Read 831 times)