xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete  (Read 341 times)

K-FleX

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #60 on: December 20, 2004, 04:39:00 AM »

Thankyou for the updates devz3ro!

Just to clarify, does the dashboard still have to be signed in the dashboard folder?
Logged

devz3ro

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 229
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #61 on: January 07, 2005, 05:15:00 AM »

uxe-complete-v0.2

&

ude2-complete-v0.2

Both compiled and now sent to the usual places. As soon as I get the latest copy of waffletools that will be submitted also.

Major update was nkpatcher 10 with choice of 06 or 67 flavor partitions.

Nothing needs to be signed K-FleX, to replace the dash just read the readme, it's very simple.

-devz3ro
Logged

devz3ro

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 229
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #62 on: May 05, 2005, 01:10:00 PM »

updated to 0.2.2, found in usual places.

-devz3ro
Logged

jonels

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 166
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #63 on: May 05, 2005, 01:49:00 PM »

0.2.2 won't work on PAL boxes ?
Logged

cmiz

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 438
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #64 on: May 05, 2005, 02:10:00 PM »

wink.gif

the dash now loads from E instead of C which was originally causing problems as the dash loads from your virtual C drive and NOT your real C drive. some noobs had trouble figuring that whole "thing" out...

also seems he added s.xtf to the fonts setup which will make the 71 fonts compatible with almost any xbox.

overall, a change for the better i'd say! great work as usual.
Logged

devz3ro

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 229
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #65 on: May 06, 2005, 10:43:00 AM »

QUOTE(cmiz @ May 5 2005, 08:16 PM)
it should work on pal
Logged

jonels

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 166
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #66 on: May 06, 2005, 12:41:00 PM »

i like the way there is a default setup for those with alergic reactions to readme.txt files who don't run the bats
Logged

cmiz

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 438
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #67 on: May 06, 2005, 04:02:00 PM »

QUOTE(jonels @ May 6 2005, 12:47 PM)
i like the way there is a default setup for those with alergic reactions to readme.txt files who don't run the bats
Logged

devz3ro

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 229
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #68 on: May 06, 2005, 05:37:00 PM »

QUOTE(devz3ro @ May 6 2005, 11:41 PM)
Fixed readme and changed the default setup to *not* have the nkpatcher and fonts in place (May have been a good idea, but it's also a good idea to follow the very simple directions). Also changed the following before compiling:
Logged

jonels

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 166
Ltools Vs. Ude2-complete / Uxe-complete
« Reply #69 on: May 15, 2005, 06:58:00 AM »

edit.. stupid idea
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]