Look, both chips and exploits have thier ups and downs. But there really isn't much difference:
1. M$ could disable the exploits with a mandatory update.
- True, they could. But they could just as easily scan the HD for any alterations and do nasty things with the update if found. Sure your chip still works, but you can't run anything but MS Dash or nothing at all because they have nuked it.
2. Bios's can change as needed.
- Also true, but if you have an odd bios loaded, it can be detected. If you turn the chip off to avoid this what is the point in having one?
I agree that the chip is the more flexible of the two, but it is potentailly just as easy to screw with. To use the chip effectivly you have to change the content of the drive, and this is detectable. Even if you stuff everything on F:\ they could come up with a way to scan the unpartitioned space for recognizable signatures. Or just the fact that the drive is larger than expected. They can find you, chip on or off, if they really try to look.
Bottom line is that until an ECM is developed for the exploits they are virtually as powerful and useful as a chip. And a chip doesn't offer you much more in the way of protection. As long as you got a HD backup and your HDD key either is fine.
I see a lot of peeps bitching about how the scene is ruined because of this.... Well lets look at it this way, Do they still sell PS2's? How about PS One's? They both have SW hacks... But aren't they the top selling game systems..... Looks like it hurt them alot!
You think you are better than others because you took a hot iron to your MB? Well it's nice you can solder... Me, I shake too much for that. But don't think it makes you a better person... You wanna be big in the scene and demand respect? LEARN TO CODE!!!!! Look at BJ or the others, those are the guys who get my respect. Not someone who was cool enough to slap a chip in a machine!
Morden.