Am I missing something here?
IMHO the way Xodus *BEAT* the competition with the chameleon was price.
In the UK the Chameleon excelled in this area, the Executor 2.3 Lite was 40% more expensive than a Chameleon. (Executor 2.3 Lite = £25, Chameleon 1.8LE = £15)
Ok, so features wise the P&E connectors ALSO set it infront of the competition with no "unsightly" external switches but they appear to have gone from the Xenium.
(NOTE: Perhaps P&E will be replaced with a software solution?)
Looking at the complexity of the Xenium, the BOM (Bill of Materials) etc. it's not going to be cheaper than the Chameleon to make and keep up quality.
Looking at it's feature set I personally dont see ANYTHING that sets it above the chameleon.
- 2Mbit flash. So what most people dont use 1Mbit to it's full potential
- Removable D0. Cool, but I add these to my Chameleons as per a Tutorial on this website
- Emergency System Recovery. This is the most interesting of the features, but I'd need to know how it works. Where do they store the data, if it's in the flash surely a bad flash can still corrupt the entire chip, even if they tie off an address line to a switch?
That's it?
Ok, so I will buy these instead of chameleons if they are about the same price, but I dont see them as 4th Gen modchips, IMHO it's an evolution of the Chameleon design. Dump the redundant Matrix programmer port, add the removable D0 connector that people have wanted, and increase the size of the flash.
I'll be pleasantly suprised if I am proved wrong.
Regards to Team Xodus (ozXodus).
Alex