After graduating from Uni I went to work for a company who tested circuit boards. This is during the design stage, well before the actual circuit found its way into its final home. I signed many NDA's, throughout the 80's. To cut the story short I have training and various qualifications in writing test code for Zehntel ATM's. So I am a Test engineer
I can see by reading my post again that it was not written as clear as I thought I had. Let me explain;
If there is an issue that components can fail then no one should be installing these mod chips. Cutting tracks could lead to more unforseen problems. To successfully test a circuit takes weeks if not months. I questioned if the person who discovered this had actually tested it to failure. I did not see any test results only theory. Also a disclaimer would be nice too. Who do the people come back to once this procedure fails.
I do not say its not worthwile to do, "better safe than sorry" I agree. But with my testing hat on I prefer to have conclusive proof before I go about making any changes.
By the way there is another way to do this without cutting tracks, just take a leaf out of the PC modding scene
