I suppose the decision falls to you to go back to Slax, as you are the sole programnmer on TC. It might be case of why fix it if it's not broken? You have to ask yourself why pursue - it may use less memory and its faster, but is there a demand? If you feel that we have hit the wall with TC then I am happy to continue to use Slax as my preferred method for building a xbox drive. For me, the major drawback with Slax is the boot up time with a locked drive (about 7 mins). I like the idea of TC - it's smaller, faster and boots up in 15secs even with a locked hd. IF you got TC working then I would always use TC, that's why I am keen to see it developed.
Good point . When I read xboxhdm3 was alpha I thought happy days -

- a few days of testing here and there to make it a generic solution but 9 days later I am hinking it should be renamed 'beta'.
I am curious has anyone else had success with xboxhdm3, even yourself?
Hope this helps

Thanks for your feedback. By the way, quoting from Wikipedia,
I will put the project on hold until I sort out the SLAX/TC design considerations. Thanks for your testing efforts so far.