Topic: Blu-ray continues to outpace HD DVD with '300' release (Read 148 times)

Mr Invader · « **Reply #15 on:** August 09, 2007, 10:48:00 PM »

QUOTE(colt45joe @ Aug 9 2007, 10:01 PM)

300 on Blu-ray actually sounds better than the hd-dvd release because of the extra space.

So you're glad that 300 on Blu-ray had the potential to be better but instead it passed up the chance? I don't get it. Someone please explain.

Achtung · « **Reply #16 on:** August 10, 2007, 05:55:00 AM »

QUOTE(colt45joe @ Aug 10 2007, 04:01 AM)

300 on Blu-ray actually sounds better than the hd-dvd release because of the extra space.

You should get a job at sony

Ninja Sniper X · « **Reply #17 on:** August 10, 2007, 05:04:00 PM »

I admit I was at first skeptical about the usefulness of having HD-DVD and DVD on one disk but when the UPS guy delivered 300 another family member was on the big screen. I was eager so I watched it on my computer, DVD use #1.

Later in the day I watched it on my Toshiba A2 (my god it was gorgeous!!!). Two days later I watched it at a friends house on his dvd player, DVD use #2. Then when I got home I ripped it onto my xbox, DVD use #3.

I'm now very glad that they have these dual format disks.

tummybanana · « **Reply #18 on:** August 11, 2007, 04:16:00 AM »

QUOTE(Ninja Sniper X @ Aug 11 2007, 12:40 AM)

I admit I was at first skeptical about the usefulness of having HD-DVD and DVD on one disk but when the UPS guy delivered 300 another family member was on the big screen. I was eager so I watched it on my computer, DVD use #1.

Later in the day I watched it on my Toshiba A2 (my god it was gorgeous!!!). Two days later I watched it at a friends house on his dvd player, DVD use #2. Then when I got home I ripped it onto my xbox, DVD use #3.

I'm now very glad that they have these dual format disks.

there you go.....kinda what i was trying to say

Author Topic: Blu-ray continues to outpace HD DVD with '300' release (Read 148 times)