Searching is tough cause there are so many articles bashing Sony for their decision that any search criteria turns something up relating the the removal of hardware BC.
I did find this though.
http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=55108 Dated: 05/12/2006
The 1st few paragraphs hit on a little bit why every person wanting to buy a PS3 has the right to be mad at the decision to remove hardware BC.
QUOTE
...On Backwards Compatibility
[The PS3 will have] almost perfect backwards compatibility. There will be some exceptions, but we believe those will be even less than we saw from PSOne to PS2.
"Backwards compatibility, as you know from PlayStation One and PlayStation 2, is a core value of what we believe we should offer. And access to the library of content people have created, bought for themselves, and accumulated over the years is necessary to create a format. PlayStation is a format meaning that it transcends many devices -- PSOne, PS2, and now PS3."
"If the developer wrote the game according to our technical requirements checklist, we will have what we believe will be almost perfect backwards compatibility. There will be some exceptions, there always are, but we believe those will be very few and far between. Even less so than we saw from PSOne to PS2."
...On Microsoft's Difficulties with Xbox 360 Backward Compatibility
"I don't believe that was backwards compatibility."
I also found this for Thraxen, the only member here maintaining that Sony had delivered on their BC promise, when using hardware chips.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/745/745506p1.html Dated: 11/13/2006
QUOTE
In response to these issues, Sony's PR department pointed out that it, from the start, expected backwards compatibility to be less than 100%. It was also good enough to point out that some people can put up with playing games that lack sound.
This post has been edited by throwingks: Mar 21 2007, 03:44 PM