Print

[proger]

Do you think it looked impressive? I didn't perosnally think it was a huge step from 360.. probally pre-rendered too.

This post has been edited by proger: Aug 23 2006, 06:25 PM

[KAGE360]

QUOTE(proger @ Aug 23 2006, 12:54 PM)

Do you think it looked impressive? I didn't perosnally think it was a huge step from 360.. probally pre-rendered too.

it was nice looking but FAR from the quality of the original TGS trailer.  its should be obvious to even the fanboys that they are toning down the graphics immensely.  they look good still but its very clear now that the 360 can render graphics just as good.

in fact IMHO, i believe GoW looks far better.....

newest MGS4 pic:


newest GoW pic:


i know the games are entirely different but many consider them to be the graphical premier title for either platform.  in terms of texture detail and such i believe that GoW is the more impressive of the two IMHO.

[proger]

That GoW image is probally pure prerendered itself. (Saying that with an open mind..)

[KAGE360]

QUOTE(proger @ Aug 23 2006, 01:48 PM)

That GoW image is probally pure prerendered itself. (Saying that with an open mind..)

No, CliffyB and company have stated many times that everything they show running on the U3E is real time.  this is real time

[proger]

QUOTE(KAGE360 @ Aug 23 2006, 01:49 PM)

No, CliffyB and company have stated many times that everything they show running on the U3E is real time.  this is real time

And sony said thier stuff was realtime...
But M$ is more respectable, so I will believe them before sony ANYDAY!

Looking closer I see jaggies on the GoW.. hm.... probally is realtime.

This post has been edited by proger: Aug 23 2006, 07:25 PM

[DragoNs]

regardless of the differance in graphics, you gotta remember the gameplay, and all the other MGS' are amazing games.

[KAGE360]

QUOTE(proger @ Aug 23 2006, 01:54 PM)

And sony said thier stuff was realtime...
But M$ is more respectable, so I will believe them before sony ANYDAY!

well this isnt sony or MS making this claim its cliffyb and mark rein.  these two i highly respect and see no reason why they would lie because they were speaking on U3E games in general not just GoW.  this statement basically means their two U3E games (GoW and UT2k7) have been presented only in real time

QUOTE(DragoNs @ Aug 23 2006, 01:56 PM)

regardless of the differance in graphics, you gotta remember the gameplay, and all the other MGS' are amazing games.

i guess, the gameplay has grown a little bit old especially since splinter cell came in the scene reinventing how stealth games are played.  

but this topic is about the graphics.

[proger]

QUOTE(DragoNs @ Aug 23 2006, 01:56 PM)

regardless of the differance in graphics, you gotta remember the gameplay, and all the other MGS' are amazing games.

I always found MGS extreamly boring. I don't like stealth tho, so that's probally why.

[Mr Invader]

QUOTE(proger @ Aug 23 2006, 12:58 PM)

I always found MGS extreamly boring. I don't like stealth tho, so that's probally why.

I always thought that MGS was an alright game. It was nothing compared to Splinter Cell. But what really turned me down was the camera angles which i hope they fix. The crappy camera angles made the gameplay worse.

and in my opinion i think they definetely toned down the current graphics of MGS4 compared to the announcement trailer (which they stated was not pre-rendered)

[Kira Yamoto]

well that screenshot up there wasnt a good representative.  how about a screenshot that has a good amount of detail in it.  it seems to me the screenshot the OP provided was one from desert-like camo, and desert-type background which inherently doesnt feature a lot of detail anyways.

[Mr Invader]

QUOTE(Kira Yamoto @ Aug 23 2006, 04:14 PM)

well that screenshot up there wasnt a good representative.  how about a screenshot that has a good amount of detail in it.  it seems to me the screenshot the OP provided was one from desert-like camo, and desert-type background which inherently doesnt feature a lot of detail anyways.

yes i agree about that screenshot being terrible compared to some other ones. But i still think thegraphics have gotten worse. Just look at the MGS4 video that came out around E3 '05 compared to the video they had at E3 '06. Definetely not the same as far as visuals go

[KAGE360]

(IMG:http://www.gamersreports.com/grimages/1154/1156340610/3/1/gr.image.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.gamersreports.com/grimages/1154/1156340602/3/1/gr.image.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.gamersreports.com/grimages/1154/1156340587/3/1/gr.image.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.gamersreports.com/grimages/1154/1156340578/3/1/gr.image.jpg)

it doesnt matter, while the game looks good it still does not have the intricate details that the original trailer had or other games have.  the game has taken a decline in graphics, that is not something to be denied.  i was hoping jaggies would be gone on the ps3, but there are a lot of games that show otherwise.

good or bad, these screens should speak most accurate towards the graphics because they are the more resent.

This post has been edited by KAGE360: Aug 23 2006, 11:54 PM

[hamwbone]

could they at least make the ropes not have angles!!  =)   last picture

[DragoNs]

QUOTE(proger @ Aug 23 2006, 01:58 PM)

I always found MGS extreamly boring. I don't like stealth tho, so that's probally why.

Have you ever played MGS2: Sons of Liberty? that game has some of the most funny things you will ever see in a video game. right near the end of the game when things start messing up the people say the most funniest things. The games worth to play just for the end.

[Reaper527]

QUOTE(hamwbone @ Aug 23 2006, 07:07 PM)

could they at least make the ropes not have angles!!  =)   last picture

its ok though, because the angles will be rendered in 1080p because sony said so who wants smooth graphics in 1080i when we can have angles in 1080p