QUOTE(Vicious69 @ Apr 27 2006, 08:30 PM)

It's funny to see so many people freak out over a name. Think about the current video game systems out there and how "great" the names are:
1. PlayStation (2,3): wow, that's really thought invoking. Perhaps Nintendo should have renamed there new system the GameBox, or VideoGameMachine?
2. XBOX / XBOX 360: I guess this was suppose to make it seem like the machine was some cutting-edge badass that was the new, cool system to have.
I agree that Revolution was a more appropriate name (and indeed a better sounding one), but think that to choose to buy or not buy simply based on a name instead of the content of the system would be ignorant.
I wouldn't care if it was called the Nintendo Anus. Hell, I'd probably laugh every time I said the name, but if the games and the system do everything we expect it to, then who cares?
Sorry guy, you're not the first one to bring up this point.
You can't just sweep this move under the rug and simply call it another console with a bad name.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Yes the Playstation is a bad name, and even worse the Dreamcast (not to mention Xbox 360)
but "Wii" goes beyond a bad name for a console.
It almost seems deliberate (even the Nintendo fan boys are hurting).
I feel sorry for Nintendo, I really do.
I can defend the controller but I can't defend the Wii name.
It's a damn shame too because I feel way too many people are going to be turned off by the name itself.
I understand that games ultimately sell the system but Nintendo has just dug themselves deeper into the whole they've been trying to crawl out of.
I now seriously question the actions of their company president
