xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Half Life 2  (Read 368 times)

addyb

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Half Life 2
« Reply #30 on: November 25, 2004, 11:32:00 AM »

QUOTE (Spency234 @ Nov 25 2004, 08:18 PM)
Not true, I've had girlfriends who loved playing with me.

LMAO i also agree, there's nothing more enjoyable then when my GF grabs hold of my joystick and plays away till her hearts content! If i happen to pi55 her off which too much pc or xbox gaming ill just take her shopping and buy her loads of stuff... no problem... im loaded!!!! rolleyes.gif

But to be honest its only been recently that ive been getting plenty of gaming in. Before Halo2 and HL2 came out i wasnt really on the xbox a great deal nor pc. My last game completed was doom 3 and farcry so had a good few weeks of just making her watch bruce lee and chan films, with a few horrors thrown in!!
Not completed HL2 yet....  im on the latter part of the sandtrap level, going well so far!
Logged

McGeyser

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 174
Half Life 2
« Reply #31 on: November 25, 2004, 02:15:00 PM »

Finished HL2 last night. Had a great time playing it. It was over too soon IMO and the ending seemed like it was in a hurry to be over without much explanation. Anyone else feel that way too?
Logged

ravage73

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 429
Half Life 2
« Reply #32 on: November 25, 2004, 03:10:00 PM »

QUOTE (Fuzzy @ Nov 25 2004, 03:26 PM)
Wait, What resolution are you running at?

1280x1024
Logged

Fuzzy

  • Recovered User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2230
Half Life 2
« Reply #33 on: November 25, 2004, 04:27:00 PM »

QUOTE (ravage73 @ Nov 25 2004, 06:13 PM)
1280x1024

AMD processor?
Logged

ravage73

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 429
Half Life 2
« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2004, 07:25:00 PM »

QUOTE (Fuzzy @ Nov 25 2004, 08:30 PM)
AMD processor?

yup, 2500+. and 512 of kingston hyperx ram.
Logged

DMJR

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Half Life 2
« Reply #35 on: November 25, 2004, 08:30:00 PM »

i have a dell 8400 sys-- 3.4ghz with a pci express radeon x300 video card.  will this be enough to run half life 2 and doom 3?

thanks d.
Logged

PresidentSparx

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Half Life 2
« Reply #36 on: November 25, 2004, 09:26:00 PM »

QUOTE
i really think that hl3 will explain everything just like halo 2


LMAO  laugh.gif  Just like halo 2....... dry.gif
Logged

enderandrew

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 414
Half Life 2
« Reply #37 on: November 26, 2004, 12:15:00 AM »

QUOTE (powercntrl @ Nov 25 2004, 09:08 AM)
LOL, so true.  When his $3,000 rig is worthless...  I'll still be playing whatever the current console is on my 42" plasma set.  I kept my old TV close to 10 years, I expect to keep my current one just as long.  Some things just provide a better lasting value.   biggrin.gif

The other thing I spent some megabucks on recently was a Canon Digital Rebel.  Holy mother of fuck, it's a nice camera.  Sure, I could have bought some serious upgrades for my Athlon XP2000, I even priced out a new Athlon64 system on newegg.  But I can't justify the expense of upgrading a computer that's perfectly fine for everything I use it for except the latest games.

I realize the console vs PC thing has been done to death, but things really are at a point where a shitty gaming rig can still be a perfectly usable computer.  Upgrades used to give me a massive performence boost.  As it is, my XP2000 tears through Photoshop and audio editing tasks.  Eventually I'll upgrade my rig - but not just to play a $50 video game.

Let me get this straight.

You bought a 42" Plasma?  Last I checked they run around $7,000.  Plasma TV's require maintenance, are an absolute bitch to install, and are being surpassed by newer DLP and LCD TV's that are cheaper.  Talk about money going down the drain due to newer technology.

Did I also mention that $2000-$3000 could net you a decent projection system where you could get a great picture and a 9 foot screen?

A buddy of mine just bought a digital rebel, and spent some $900 on the camera.  I just bought a $300 Cannon ELPH and take pictures that look just as good.  I have all the same features too.

And I just priced an Athlon64 system today for a friend.  I was buying a few clearance and refurb parts, but I can build him a good Athlon64 for $700.

And people talk about the big price difference in consoles and PCs.  I can build a pretty damn nice PC for $1,000 that will play every game on the market.  A console at launch will cost you over $300.

The PC has more games available, can multitask, surf the internet, perform infinately more functions, and runs much better games.  You see, the PC outperforms the console, has more complex games, and much better graphics.

And if I wanted to play on a TV, most decent video cards have S-Video or DVI outputs where I can just stream the output to my HDTV.

Until I hacked the XBox and spent another $200 on it, the XBox didn't do anything but play XBox games.

Lastly, your XP2000 may perform fairly well, but every single benchmark in the world says that Athlon based processors perform rather poorly in photoshop, auto editting, video editing, rendering, encoding and decoding.  Mind you, Athlons outperform Pentium 4's in gaming benchmarks, but if you do a lot of Photoshop and audio work, you may want to consider an Intel for your next processor.
Logged

sfld

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Half Life 2
« Reply #38 on: November 26, 2004, 01:04:00 PM »

You can get a 42 inch plasma, thats EDTV which is no diff from hdtv when it comes to using it for gaming or DVDS, for 1500-2000, i dunno about your numbers but fuck what it costs, you pay the cost to be THE BOSS,
Logged

Fuzzy

  • Recovered User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2230
Half Life 2
« Reply #39 on: November 26, 2004, 03:06:00 PM »

QUOTE (ravage73 @ Nov 25 2004, 10:28 PM)
yup, 2500+. and 512 of kingston hyperx ram.

Ah, that's why. Half Life 2 is know to run WAY better on AMD.
Logged

powercntrl

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 407
Half Life 2
« Reply #40 on: November 27, 2004, 03:05:00 AM »

QUOTE
You bought a 42" Plasma?  Last I checked they run around $7,000


You might want to check again.  I paid $2,400 and the same model is going for around $1,900 now.

QUOTE
Plasma TV's require maintenance


Yup, you have to wipe off the dust that accumulates on the screen.  It's a backbreaking job, but for a crystal clear picture, it's worth all the blood, sweat and tears.   rolleyes.gif

QUOTE
absolute bitch to install


A lot of them now include this amazing feature called a "stand", which allows you to "install" the TV by setting it on a solid surface, like say, a wooden entertainment center.  Granted, the cables don't plug themselves in, but no one seems to fault the Xbox for that shortcoming either.

QUOTE
DLP and LCD TV's that are cheaper


DLPs are rear projection and not flat.  A DLP TV quite literally would not fit where I have my Plasma TV.  LCDs look like shit compared to Plasma.  Maybe they'll improve in the future, maybe we'll have robots that wipe our asses, the fact was I wanted a TV when I bought it.

QUOTE
Talk about money going down the drain due to newer technology.


Umm, guess what - when the Xbox 2 comes out, I can connect it to my TV just fine.  Yeah, the TV will lose value as it ages and eventually become worthless just like my 19" TV did, but it won't become any less useful.  The cost of the TV is actually just a drop in the bucket compared to how much I've spent on computer upgrades since I got into PCs back in '91.  I bought my prior TV when I was 15.  I'll still be watching DVDs on it (or possibly Blu-Ray discs) when your rig that rips up the FPS in Half Life 2 is sitting on the curb waiting for its ride to the trash heap.

QUOTE
Did I also mention that $2000-$3000 could net you a decent projection system where you could get a great picture and a 9 foot screen?


Well, you shouldn't have mentioned it.  My younger brother has a projection setup, it's real nice except for the fact it looks absolutely horrible unless you're 3 miles from the screen and you have to pull down a screen to watch TV.  Unless of course you don't mind looking at the screen dangle and flap in the breeze from the ceiling fan all day long.  Oh yeah, it also can't compete with any ambient light whatsoever.  Great if you have a home theater room, crappy if you just want to sit down and watch some TV.   dry.gif

QUOTE
A buddy of mine just bought a digital rebel, and spent some $900 on the camera.  I just bought a $300 Cannon ELPH and take pictures that look just as good.  I have all the same features too.


Like a vast selection of high quality lenses and the ability to use a 4GB Microdrive as storage, just as a start?   biggrin.gif  There's a reason people buy a DSLR, if you think a point-and-shoot camera is all you need, you don't get it.

QUOTE
And I just priced an Athlon64 system today for a friend.  I was buying a few clearance and refurb parts, but I can build him a good Athlon64 for $700.


Actually, the system I had priced out was just an upgrade to what I already have...  New motherboard, CPU, RAM and video card.  To play one game, it's just not worth it.
 
QUOTE
Lastly, your XP2000 may perform fairly well, but every single benchmark in the world says that Athlon based processors perform rather poorly in photoshop, auto editting, video editing, rendering, encoding and decoding.


Well every benchmark in the world can say a new system can whoop the shit out of mine and I'd believe it.  But when I apply a filter in Photoshop and it completes in under a second, I fail to see the need to throw money at a nonexistant problem.  I'll give you video rendering is slow as shit no matter how fast of a computer you have, but guess what - not everyone is a home Spielberg.  I own an old VHS camcorder and I never use it.

My point isn't to argue over who has more toys, it's who gets more use out of what he spends.  If you actually use your computer to play modern PC games on a regular basis and you're getting what you feel is a good value out of it - by all means continue to do so.  Maybe I'm getting older, but I just feel there's other, more interesting things to spend money on than computer parts every time a new game comes out.  I've got a 286 in my closet with Star Control 2 on it that's a true testament to that fact.  Damn VGA-only games, damn them to hell.   rolleyes.gif
Logged

darkslider802

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 120
Half Life 2
« Reply #41 on: November 27, 2004, 11:28:00 AM »

sorry i havent replyed in a while ,yeah i stil havent seen anything on half 2 because my mom doesnt have cable


well how was everybodies thanksgiving?
Logged

Ice9Tech

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Half Life 2
« Reply #42 on: November 28, 2004, 06:38:00 AM »

Will Half-Life 2 run on my 486?
Logged

geniusalz

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1635
Half Life 2
« Reply #43 on: November 28, 2004, 04:26:00 PM »

The same way an xbox emulator will run on the NES.
Logged

nemt

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1633
Half Life 2
« Reply #44 on: November 28, 2004, 05:21:00 PM »

QUOTE (sfld @ Nov 26 2004, 05:07 PM)
You can get a 42 inch plasma, thats EDTV which is no diff from hdtv when it comes to using it for gaming or DVDS, for 1500-2000, i dunno about your numbers but fuck what it costs, you pay the cost to be THE BOSS,

EDTV = 480p
HDTV = 480p, 720p, 1080i

It's the same for DVDs (as of now) but Xbox games can do 720p and 1080i.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4