QUOTE (Spency234 @ Mar 26 2004, 09:22 PM) |
chilin_dude, you aren't going to win this argument with the total board members being about 90% American. |
I'm going to damned try!!!!
QUOTE |
Well, SOCCER doesn't involve tackling and intentional collisions at high speed. |
You obviously haven't watched many competetive matches recently, watch a player like Alan Smith and you will see that this occurs very often... not that its good mind.
QUOTE |
Trotting down a huge field tapping a ball with your toes is hardly "fast paced action" or "hard hitting" |
Huge field? Its not even that big, and they don't 'trot' down it, they run down it if you are watching attacking football like Real Madrid v Man U. And I would call this fast paced. 'Hard Hitting' See above and also if you get hit by a football going 120mph from Thierry Henry you won't be saying its not hard hitting... especially in the balls... trust me
QUOTE |
I'll admit that Rugby is a pretty tough sport, though - and that's what American Football descended from (and predates the sport those guys above are prancing about over). |
Ack rugby is too boring... not nearly as fast paced as football... it is however the game with the most hits like you mention, however I would still take NFL over this anyday.
QUOTE |
Technically, Soccer was called "Association Football" - kind of like "Powderpuff Football" or "Flag Football" - |
Why is Association football like powderpuff football? Thats like saying the phrase American Football is like Fairy Football
QUOTE |
different from "real" football. |
What? English Football is THE real football
QUOTE |
The term "Soccer" was derived from that, though "Futbol" is an acceptable name. |
I've NEVER heard football be called 'futbol' I mean i don't even understand where that name came from.
QUOTE |
since it is easily differentiated from the hard hitting American sport. |
Don't get me started on that again... See further up
*Prefers to right another essay after BJ'S reply*