They did not shut up shop because sony won any court case,they shut up because of a trick lots of multi million dollar corps do to beat small companies , bombard them with legal suit after legal suit in multiple courts across the land ,which the small company just cannot afford to pay legal fees ,Air fares to defend themselves in all these cases.
So nothing sony said about Lik-Sang actually got proved in sony's favour in any court case , the uk case wouldn't have forced lik-Sang to shut up shop & this is what Sony knew so they resorted to the tried & tested Bastards trick of keeping them swamped with lawsuits til the cows come home ,sony has the money to defend any amount of legal challenges but smaller companies don't have these bottom less money pits.
And how the hell our UK law got applied to a HONG KONG based company is beyond me.
So don't come out with these unfounded BULL SHIT claims of Lik-sang breaking laws resulting in them closing down, FOR NOW!
............................................................................................
Sony do it the pro way:
"Now Sony's in the middle of another patent fight, this one brought against the company by Pennsylvania-based Agere Systems. According to court documents, Agere (which has a pair of offices in Texas) has filed suit against Sony and a number of its divisions for willful infringement of eight patents in a number of its products, including the PSP, PlayStation 2, and based on announced specifications, the PlayStation 3. Sony VAIO computers, Handycams, Walkman players, Memory Stick Duos, and Location Free TV are also named as infringing offerings on some of the patents. The patents in question run from a "wireless local area network apparatus" to "barrier layer treatments for tungsten plug."
Agere is asking that each branch of Sony be made to provide an accounting of all gains made through their alleged infringements, and that the company be awarded damages to adequately compensate it based on those figures. Agere also claims that Sony knew about the patents and willfully infringed on them, so it is asking the courts to boost the damages awarded as much as three times what it would have been otherwise.