*just went and read your comments in the other thread so you can skip most of the below, but i strongly suggest you look into steve jones' stuff...
so the fact that this is the only example of a building with those approximate circumstances (obviously theres no precedent of an airplane hitting a skyscrapper) collapsing, let alone straight down in a near freefall should raise any suspicion? if the official story is a weakening of the building by fire caused a collapse, of which ill fully admit gravity will affect a weakened structure, that still doesnt come near to accounting for the straight down collapse... the fire, regardless of the fact that it couldnt have possibly been hot enough to compromise the structural integrity based on only burning office supplies, would not have a uniform affect on the structure... add that to the main point, the impact of the planes, and there is no way they should have collapsed the way they did...
and back to the squibs from the floors below... why would there be explosions in staggered stories below seconds before and during the collapse? no explanation there, it shouldnt have happened given the official story...
note: im not saying something crazy like bush did it to control the world because hes a lizard creature, im just saying that the official story does not add up and the evidence surrounding is very, very suspicious...