Print

[xmedia2004]

QUOTE(blagmaster @ Sep 12 2005, 08:16 PM)

Did anyone see Boondock Saints?

[blagmaster]

All the killings in that movie were justified

[hugoboss1]

QUOTE(Arvarden @ Sep 12 2005, 02:41 PM)

You prolly pulled up in a "dogging" hotspot. 

[xmedia2004]

QUOTE(blagmaster @ Sep 13 2005, 08:41 AM)

All the killings in that movie were justified

[thewickedjester]

QUOTE(hugoboss1 @ Sep 13 2005, 12:27 PM)

lock them in a cell were they can never come out are fed under the door and they are given sharp tools plenty of rope and they can take care of them selves and that would be beetween them and god

[vingasoline]

Here in saskatchewan the legal age is 14, no matter how old you are.  I think it should be at least 16 because young girls make some pretty stupid decisions in life.  I see 30 year olds with 14 year olds and it's sick..  Sure when i'm 60, I hope to be pounding a hot 16 year old so that I won't need to buy viagra, but it's still rediculous..

I have a 9 month old daughter, and if anybody puts a hand on her, I will fucking murder them in the worst possible way possible..  Possibly tied up in my basement  being tortured by various items and fed through a iv just to keep the bastard alive.. Until my rage subsides..

I could care less about consentual sex between a 40 year old and a 14 year old..  Statutory rape shouldn't even be a crime.  Maybe parents should pay more attention the their kids and make them feel special so that some 30 or 40 year old man doesn't have to..  

I say kill the RAPING bastards.  They are almost guaranteed to reoffend, so why let them back into civilization..  

It's stupid that a guy that rapes a 6 year old gets a year in jail..  Then the father of the six year old shoots the rapist dead gets a life sentence.  How's that for justice..

[puckSR]

You missed the original thread

A guy randomly went to the homes of two men convicted of sex crimes, and killed them.  He didnt know them, he didnt know who they were or what they did.  He just went on the internet, found some names, and went hunting.

Hey, i hate child molestors too, but holy fucking shit people, save the rage for when we figure out that person is a sick fuck.  Even then, what kind of sick, demented person is going to want to torture someone?  I agree that these people have problems, and that it may require a drastic solution; but you all have detailed torture/murder/mutilation fantasies for how to deal with these people.  It sounds to me as if your as sick as them, albeit in a different way.

[bluedeath]

QUOTE(puckSR @ Sep 24 2005, 02:06 PM)

You missed the original thread

[vingasoline]

QUOTE(Wong Hung Lo @ Sep 9 2005, 06:41 PM)

When you are older and have kids. You won't think the same as you do now. If some sick bastard molested your child. You'd want him to die a slow painfull death.

[mckenn88]

I think that puckSR is the only person that is sensibly talking about this topic. Don't get me wrong, I hate child molesters just like everyone else, I believe they are the scum of the earth and they have to be dealt with someway, but putting a .22 in every redneck's hand and sicking him on every child molester is just wrong.

[xmedia2004]

QUOTE(Rustmonkey @ Nov 12 2005, 07:08 AM)

I do agree that catholic priests are getting alot of grief for the pedophillia.  A small number of people screw it up for everyone.  I also agree that they are NOT "sick fucks."  Pedophillia is a psychological disorder, just like APD, depression, or schizophrenia --- check the DSM-IV-TR, nowhere in the description or diagnosis does it say "sick fuck."  Disturbed, maybe.  Conditioned, probabley... but I bet if we ran some statistical studies b/w the normal population and priests for pedophillia, there wouldn't be that much of a difference.  And the best way to fix it is treatment, not locking people up, either way.  I believe people have a right to know about a pedophile, but I don't believe they deserve to be treated like a malevolent criminal.  Many pedophiles don't intend harm to children or wish to harm them (like someone with APD).  I believe we need to recognize it and treat it, not stone them to death

[KRAK_JOE]

QUOTE(Arvarden @ Sep 12 2005, 07:37 PM)

You prolly pulled up in a "dogging" hotspot. 

[XeroKitsune]

*refering to the orginal post*
They don't mencon how much research the killer did. Yes he got thier address from the website, but I would imagine that there was more information involved especial since they were both "Level III sex offenders" and it is doubtfull he or is famialy was the victoms of both offenders.
Depending on this he may have used this as morality to resolve previous personal homisidal tendencies. I mean without motivate besides the discust most if not all people feel after hearing about such vulgar acts, what pulls them from being discusted to out and out killing of the convicted. Eather he was a killer looking for moral ground or had some personal(if not in his family) experance with a molester.
While I'm not saying the world isn't a better place without the sick indivuals that our justice system coddles before relicing, but there has to be some resoning behind thier murders beyond the obvious.

On another note; if the NRA can realy sell it in congress I would wager the goverment could make a fortune selling "Sex Offender Hunting Licence"s.

[KRAK_JOE]

QUOTE(Arvarden @ Nov 17 2005, 07:20 PM)

Democracy is all about the masses, what you are suggesting is a state in which anarchy rules the day.

[puckSR]

Absolutely

This all boils down to one thing....should we validate Vigilante justice

The complete,total, and unquestionable answer is....FUCK NO

No one has the right to decide who lives and dies

Most people want to kill child molestors
Some people want to kill murders
A few people want to kill shoplifters

How do we decide who we hunt down, and who we dont?
Simple answer...you do not hunt down anyone...ever....for any reason