Topic: Why Did You Elect John Kerry In The Primaries? (Read 592 times)

pug_ster · « **Reply #60 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:03:00 PM »

Yes, the only thing that you mentioned that Clinton didn't force inspectors in the ground and that is why he decided to bomb Iraq in 1998 out of frustration.

Let me ask you;

1) Did Kerry imply there was WMD's in Iraq?

2) Did Kerry say that there was a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam?

From your text, what Kerry said didn't answer the questions for anything above.

Baner · « **Reply #61 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:19:00 PM »

I think what fay was trying to get out is the fact that Kerry is so anti-war now, But in 2001, he supported the war against Hussain "no matter what the evidence is about September 11." According to those quotes, Kerry was all for attacking Afghanastan, then following through to put Saddam out of power. Please don't use, "Saddam is out of power now, we need to leave now." because that would leave Iraq open for another tyrant to step into power.

faynor · « **Reply #62 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:26:00 PM »

SEN. JOHN KERRY: "t is something that we know-for instance, Saddam Hussein has used weapons of mass destruction against his own people, and there is some evidence of their efforts to try to secure these kinds of weapons and even test them." (CBS "Face The Nation," 9/23/01)

pug_ster · « **Reply #63 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:27:00 PM »

Baner · « **Reply #64 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:42:00 PM »

I'm not saying the US has proof there are WMDs. I said Clinton sent inspectors to Iraq and found nothing, yet when Bush said he thought there are WMDs in Iraq we all believed. Want me to draw you a picture to explain this?

Clinton - 1990s - says there are WMDs - We believe him - No WMDs
Bush - 2000s - says there are WMDs - We believe him - No WMDs

Again, my quote "Fool me once..blah blah blah"
You understand what I'm saying, or is it hard to understand that a Repub is going against Bush for once? All I'm trying to prove is that we've been told the same info twice, and fell for it twice.

pug_ster · « **Reply #65 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:44:00 PM »

pug_ster · « **Reply #66 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:57:00 PM »

Baner · « **Reply #67 on:** October 22, 2004, 01:59:00 PM »

Why would he send weapons inspectors into Iraq if he didn't think there were WMDs?!?

dss311 · « **Reply #68 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:06:00 PM »

gcskate27 · « **Reply #69 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:09:00 PM »

faynor, you dont seem to get that people can be wrong at one point, rethink their position, realise they are wrong and change stances... i know its hard to imagine witha president like bush but its true... some people even, and this is quite bizarre, actually appologise and admit they were wrong...

kerrys main beef with the war is how its being carried out, and i certainly cant blame him...

pug_ster · « **Reply #70 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:14:00 PM »

pug_ster · « **Reply #71 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:18:00 PM »

Baner · « **Reply #72 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:19:00 PM »

pug_ster · « **Reply #73 on:** October 22, 2004, 02:33:00 PM »

thomes08 · « **Reply #74 on:** October 22, 2004, 03:53:00 PM »

Clinton sending inspectors into iraq was a precaution to make sure saddam was complying... plain and simple.

Just like woman check for breat cancer, they most likely don't have it but it's a precaution.

Like double knotting your shoes before a big game, one knot is most likely enougn but just in case take the precaution.

Like studying for something you're pretty sure won't be on the test, but you do it as a precaution.

ok do you understand what precautions are now?

thomes08

Author Topic: Why Did You Elect John Kerry In The Primaries? (Read 592 times)