and i love how you provide a liberal editorial site as "proof" to back up what you say. really helps out your credibility (rolls eyes)
"Rape cannot be used as an EXCUSE? If a woman is forcibly impregnated, why should she be continually forced through pregnancy and then into life as a single parent with a child she very likely cannot financially (or mentally) support?"
as was said before, this is a place to post your opinions, NOT attack people....but anywho, thats what i said. now some of the times its not the womans fault, but sometimes you have to ask what the woman was doing in a dark alley at 12:00am. okay, thats a little extreme, but you get the jist. and besides, i believe life begins at conception. and before you say anything on that, id like to see you prove otherwise, WITHOUT FLAMING. and i also cant prove it does. thats just what i believe. there is no possible way to prove either belief. you people seem to think that flaming is a great way to back up an arguement...
"A war may have been necessary, but not THIS war. This war was not formed with humanitarian goals in mind, and it shows."
hmmm, can you prove this? didn't think so.
and anywho, you repeated exactly what i said, minus the first sentence.
and to correct my original post - there is no way to prove that he did or didn't have womd. so all you liberals stop claiming that 100% he did NOT have them, and all you conservatives stop claiming 100% he DID have them. there is no proof beyond circumstantial evidence that he did or didn't have them. and most of the circumstantial evidence points towards him having them, but they are easily worked around to mean something else. im inclined to belive that if he did have nukes (ones recently produced, not leftovers) then we would have found more than we have.
"It's easy to believe this, and yes, affirmative action is essentially discriminatory. However, the idea was formed in response to public racism (yes, it does exist). For society to advance in tolerance it will have to be faded out."
you would be stupid to belive that public racism doesn't exist. but it is still discriminatory against whites, and since congress is not supposed to make any law discriminating against race, this is unconstitutional.
"Such a program would truly change life in many ways for many people. Rural families often rely on labor from their children. Many people believe being an only child has a psychological effect, whether or not thats true I can't say. Halting immigration would have to occur as well, and population will in all likeliness still increase."
i can really see both sides of this issue. this is not something i really believe in strongly either way.
"You pay for your email.. through your ISP (or advertising, if you use a web service like hotmail)."
you pay $10-$15 a month for bandwidth, all your email accounts, and web space? i think not. spam is paying for some of this, although not all of it. sorry, i realize now i made it seem like i thought spam payed for all the email, but they dont. just some of it.
"It's an interesting idea, but unfortunately theres just too much room for abuse (on all sides). If a prisoner refuses to work, what then? If a prisoner continues to harm other inmates, what should happen to him? If he kills a prison guard?"
yeah...thats a situation i didn't think of. i suppose we should keep the death penalty in reserve as a last resort. when they refuse to work, or kill/injure in prison, then you kill them. though i suppose lack of work/killing/injuring would drop if security wasnt so lax, and prisons wernt so comfortable.
"Jail isn't just punishment, it's also rehabilitation."
yes, playstation 2's, television, and internet access (all free) really help you to rehabilitate.
"You've offered no support, and shown your religious bias. That paragraph is easily discarded."
so is any other paragraph saying otherwise. its all opinion, and religous/political biasness.
"It's our environment too..."
like i said, its an opinion. what i really hate is the radicals. who want to save some stupid owl and let people go homeless.
"You appreciate a willingness to break international law and betray international authority, but praise zero tolerance for those who break national law? (see below)"
i really have a hard time seeing the UN as any kind of authority figure.
"Democracy works? When a president is elected without majority consent, democracy fails.
What leads you to believe the US is the most successful nation ever? We aren't the biggest, our economy isn't leading the world, our social programs are lacking. Is this a horrible country? Of course not. However, you also have to recognize that some of our "success" comes at the expense of others."
proof please? all you say is its horrible, its bad, but no proof. not even examples.
ill post links for why gay marriage is bad tomorrow....storming really bad here, dont want to fry my modem like i did b4...
