That's a far too simplistic way of looking at it. If such protection schemes actually succeeded in stopping piracy I might see the point in implementing them but they never do.These protection schemes end up doing nothing to stop the ultimate goal, eliminating piracy, and only end up hurting the consumer. I won't go into the numerous, well documented examples of how DRM affects the consumer but like I stated earlier, google is your friend.

I'm sorry...how does DRM hurt consumers? Seeing as how all copy-protected media I own works as it should, I don't see how it hurts me one bit. Where as pirating ultimately means that people who pay for legitimate copies of media pay for the pirating. Hmm?