Another "Bush-hater". Notice his reasons have nothing to do with why Saddam should be left alone, just that America shouldn't be allowed to strike him. There is a difference.
Also, filled with a bunch of mindless rhetoric:
quote:
How will Mr Bush know when he's wiped out all terrorists? When every single terrorist is dead? But then a terrorist is only a terrorist
once he's committed an act of terror. What about would-be terrorists?
These are the ones you really want to eliminate, since most of the known terrorists, being suicide bombers, have already eliminated themselves.
/quote
Why don't you just ask the same stupid question like "Can God create a rock HE CAN'T lift?"
Anti-war people are more pissed off that America(President Bush) is taking Saddam out, than that he is actually being taken out. Its either the "America is a Bully" excuse or the, "Somehow, magically, Iraqi oil will find its way to Bush's bank account" Bullshit.
When he gives money to people trying to kill you or he tries to assinate you, then you can talk to me about how wrong we are for wanting him out.
We DON'T hate Iraq, and don't want to destroy it or its people. We just can't let someone who wants to kill us at the first chance he get, stay in a powerful position.
Also, he complain about
quote:
Mr Bush's long-term aim is to make the world a safer place by eliminating 'rogue states' and 'terrorism'. It's such a clever long-term aim because how can you ever know when you've achieved it?
/quote:
Using that mindless thought pattern. we should also stop persuing thieves and rapest because we will never get rid of all of them.
I'm sorry because I'm usually very friendly in this board, but "THIS GUY IS A COMPLETE IDIOT!! This is definately someone who has mastered the art of speach, and at the same time, be completely void of thought or reason."