Topic: 1.7 Xbox & Smartxx ? (Read 595 times)

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #60 on:** May 25, 2005, 07:13:00 AM »

QUOTE(Avenger 2.0 @ May 25 2005, 02:17 PM)

Stealing code from GPL Cromwell project...

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #61 on:** May 25, 2005, 08:49:00 AM »

Sure Franz used GPL code in his OS but I think I can plead the "innocent based on stupidity" claim. He's such a cocky prick that he thought ANY code he had been a part of was automatically his to use...regardless of any GPL. It is true that if he had exclusively written it then fine it's ok and all but in many cases he was merely within the PROJECT and not the actual creator of some of the code. He was a dumbass.

Team Xodus never did this and in fact released part of their OS' source which indeed had GPL'd code for basic readouts and calling of I/O functions.

Plus...Hrmm...if I can remember right...a certain group used GPL'd LBA48 code in use of their release...I can't quite put my finger on the group hrmm...lemme think for a minute...Oh wait, I think you already know who I'm talking about.

kezor · « **Reply #62 on:** May 25, 2005, 08:59:00 AM »

Finally Thoughts
Franz = Shit
Xecuter > SmartXX

networkBoy · « **Reply #63 on:** May 25, 2005, 09:11:00 AM »

QUOTE

Sure Franz used GPL code in his OS . . . He's such a cocky prick that he thought ANY code he had been a part of was automatically his to use...regardless of any GPL. . . He was a dumbass.

Add to that he is a malicious ass who intentionally leaked an unstable BIOS with the thought of damaging peoples Xboxes, just to prove a point.

QUOTE

Team Xodus never did this and in fact released part of their OS' source which indeed had GPL'd code for basic readouts and calling of I/O functions.

as required by the GPL, they followed the rules, fine.

QUOTE

Plus...Hrmm...if I can remember right...a certain group used GPL'd LBA48 code in use of their release...I can't quite put my finger on the group hrmm...lemme think for a minute...Oh wait, I think you already know who I'm talking about.

you mean Evox?, EVTool?, XBTool?, any BIOS currently out there other than retail?
And where is your proof anyway? PaulB did his homework before posting claims, you just keep shooting your mouth off.

Keep it up cheese_head, we need more entertainment.
-nB

cubbox · « **Reply #64 on:** May 25, 2005, 09:36:00 AM »

PvtTolarian · « **Reply #65 on:** May 25, 2005, 10:00:00 AM »

networkBoy · « **Reply #66 on:** May 25, 2005, 11:01:00 AM »

QUOTE(Dangerously_Cheesy @ May 25 2005, 05:00 PM)

Plus...Hrmm...if I can remember right...a certain group used GPL'd LBA48 code in use of their release...I can't quite put my finger on the group hrmm...lemme think for a minute...Oh wait, I think you already know who I'm talking about.

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #67 on:** May 25, 2005, 11:26:00 AM »

You've proved nothing but my point. Besidees, why don't you examine who you are arguing to and what about. You absolutly cannot stand for someone to release something that contains GPL code but you adore and would anally give yourself to someone who rips apart and renames encrypted copyright code? Double standards my fucking ass.

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #68 on:** May 25, 2005, 11:47:00 AM »

I mean if there truly is a v1.7 (which I doubt) why won't they at the least release some basic distinguishing information :S I still say it's a varient of 1.4 or yet another 1.6...If there truly is another version Xbox I don't think that Team Xodus would be able to release anything for it seeing how the latest OS barely runs on 1.6bs

:S

Wizkid1123 · « **Reply #69 on:** May 25, 2005, 01:59:00 PM »

mbratton · « **Reply #70 on:** May 25, 2005, 04:37:00 PM »

my money's on it just being a 1.4 with hynix ram

lordvader129 · « **Reply #71 on:** May 25, 2005, 05:34:00 PM »

QUOTE(mbratton @ May 25 2005, 06:48 PM)

my money's on it just being a 1.4 with hynix ram

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #72 on:** May 25, 2005, 08:21:00 PM »

Good point about other groups not denouncing SmartXX's claim...that does say a lot though I guess. I know for a fact though that Xecuter would have one in their lab though, they seem to have dozens upon dozens of boxes comin in almost every week...wierd.

SniperKilla · « **Reply #73 on:** May 25, 2005, 08:29:00 PM »

QUOTE(Dangerously_Cheesy @ May 25 2005, 10:32 PM)

Good point about other groups not denouncing SmartXX's claim...that does say a lot though I guess. I know for a fact though that Xecuter would have one in their lab though, they seem to have dozens upon dozens of boxes comin in almost every week...wierd.

Dangerously_Cheesy · « **Reply #74 on:** May 25, 2005, 09:46:00 PM »

To say that working on a v1.7 Xbox fix is unimportant for Xecuter is not true. If their chip in any way shape or form doesn't work with a new version, no matter how suttle it is different then it paralyses them from earning any money from those people that happen to get or have that version Xbox...Why would they turn down money?

Author Topic: 1.7 Xbox & Smartxx ? (Read 595 times)