guys listen, on EVERY 360 ive taken apart new and old. the board is bent from day 1. this is because the middle of the board is higher then the outter edges. take a brand new 360. strip it down to just the metal cage and board. then remove the outter edge screws. u will notice none of the ports line up. the board is PULLED down by these screws to a height that is lower then the xclamp standoffs. so in a sense yes the xclamps are applying upward force and the outter edge screws are adding downward force to the board. The xclamps alone are fine but when u factor in the fact the board is pulled down then that means these clamps are going to work harder to push up. But i will say this again. the ONLY issue is a lack of PROPER standoffs. perfectly flat and secure. this is why the CPU which is on the short side of the board doesnt get effected. it just doesnt have the wiggle room the gpu side has nor does it have the bend as serious as on the gpu side. M$ should have scrapped these metal cages a long time ago. they know the problem but i assume they spent way too much money ahead of time on these cages to turn back now. these type of products MUST use the same methods we use in our pc's!!! and i wish people would stop quoting team hybrid or whoever as if their tut is the best around... they tell u to use plastic credit card pieces.... FAIL! they tell u to use foam to apply pressure.... FAIL! u want everything FLAT and SECURE!!! for giggles u should all go get a piece of plexi, mark off the holes that are in the 360 board. fit real pc standoffs in said holes (if ur creative u can do so) then fix the board to the plexi with screws on the underside that are countersunk so it sits flat of course. and tell me how long it takes for that board to rrod/e74. ive had one in a plexi case using my own standoffs for about 3 years now. and yes it was rrod b4 i FIXED it. now its one of my jtag boxes (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
QUOTE(Martinchris23 @ Mar 11 2010, 03:46 PM)
![*](http://174.120.39.164/forums/style_images/1/post_snapback.gif)
So we're left in a quandry: We either have to concede that games consoles MUST have a larger footprint to cater for the necessary heat dissipation for the current and future power consumption, or reduce the performance and keep a smaller footprint.
Performance is only going to go up - no console manufacturer is going to release a successor with less performance.
How many people would buy the next Xbox if it was in a midi tower case? Not that many outside of these pages I would imagine..
the case size is fine, it could be smaller. the heat is fine it could be higher. the power consumption goes down after time and different revisions. the fans are fine, but a bit on the loud side. trapped heat ISNT the problem. and theres no way of removing 100% of the heat which would be the only way to stop thermal expansion. its all about the right design all the way thru. 1 little mistake can make a small problem HUGE
QUOTE(garyopa @ Mar 11 2010, 03:37 PM)
![*](http://174.120.39.164/forums/style_images/1/post_snapback.gif)
Your changes will not help.
Sony has done that already long time ago. -- Sony had a year of seeing 360's fail, before releasing their product. -- Sony uses a little thicker PCBoard. -- Sony has a massive heatsink / fan system -- Sony has try having gpu and cpu apart, side to side, left to right, ram on both sides, ram on one side, less ram, smaller PCBoard area, with tighter clamps. -- All Sony PS3's fail also. -- I repair dozens of PS3's per week.
AMEN, whats up gary?? long time no see (for me anyways)