QUOTE(jweindel @ May 31 2011, 06:49 AM)

* 0272 – use of 9504 LT+ NOT recommended
* 02501c – use of 93450c LT+ NOT recommended
Does that mean even LT+ 1.9? Or even 2.0? and Why not recommended?
Not untill further notice! (Ie; at least wait untill LT+2.0) There are 2 good reasons on this.....
QUOTE(juggahax0r @ May 31 2011, 07:18 AM)

Which one MS28? I dumped the firmware files from the system update itself there are 3 different FWs none of which are for a Sammy , Just Sayin , my research shows differently. I have the Benq , Phat Lite-on and Slim Lite-on OFW. I did a customer machine this morning with an MS28 spoofed as MS25 err actually it was an MS25 but LT+ made it into an MS28 , with only one release of LT for Sammys , anyway it checked the drive 3 times once i put the stock ms25 FW on it , but did not flash anything new too it , I checked , and when i put LT back on it as an MS28 it worked fine again.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure if they're not updating the OFW on sammy's then they are using previously un-used CDB commands to read XGD3 (Without AP2.5, it will just skip the check as before) New CDB commands being thrown at the CFW means need new CFW..
Tiros rocks, (thanx fer Nandpro BTW) But we all sometimes make generalisations that might not live-up to the scrutiny of time etc.. He might have meant without hardware assistance, or he could have meant without being detected by live, He might be correct yet...... Many a guru has made a statement like 'The 360 will never be hacked..' etc.. you get the idea. Like I said the man rocks, in his areas of specialty his a god and just because there may be exceptions to his previous statement, should not have anything read into...
LT 1.9 will be pretty much LT+ with AP2.5 updates, 9504 FW is a different kettle of fish (as are all slim drives) and M$ have had time to pry at his 'rootkit' tech. The slims are the new battle-ground and C4 wants to get it right. I'm a little worried about his more recent statement regarding 0225 series FW:
2
QUOTE
011-05-30 01:16PM UTC] #fw <[posta]> c4eva how many more weeks u estimate the wait of new fw
[2011-05-30 01:18PM UTC] #fw <c4eva> hopefully soon, testing is in progress!
[2011-05-30 01:24PM UTC] #fw <kublai> c4eva: will the phat lite-ons be included in the lt 2.0 pack?
[2011-05-30 01:25PM UTC] #fw <c4eva> yes
[2011-05-30 01:33PM UTC] #fw <DanqeR> is there any progress for the addon of 0225 unlock? and also for 0225 cfw
[2011-05-30 01:40PM UTC] #fw <c4eva> 0225,0401 in testing, unlock kits soon!
I hope the kit can be built by us small-timers ;-) and hobbiests (like EE's and techs etc..)
Oh, and I hope we don't have to wait for X to manufacture the kits to see the FW release (some of us may want to do it the 'other' way ... ;-)
Brgds/Dan