QUOTE(vegasmtv @ Oct 30 2010, 06:19 PM)

I have two xbox 360s, one for online (Xbox 360slim) and one for offline (xbox 360 512mg arcade with lite-on 8 series drive).
I have been able to play Fable III on the Liteon flashed 360 without any problems. That console i never take online. Having played Fable on the 360 i assume i have been AP2.5 flagged. However as i never take the console online this should not be an issue.
For those with 2 360s, one for online and one for offline, If we wait till the LT+ firmware comes out and put that on the 360 we can then update the dash on the modded 360 and continue to play backups on there.
The only thing is i put my gamer profile on a usb stick and transfer between the two consoles, i hope i can continue to do this when the new dash is out and we are waiting for LT+.
I assume we should not run into any problems? As even if you have played Fable 3, the fact the consoles never online they can not ban it.
I am guessing there are many others out there in my situation, who have two 360s one for online one for offline.
The AP25 challenge failed flag causes gamertag corruption whether your console is online or offline. It doesn't matter if your console has never been connected to Live. If you play any affected game and get the "This disc is unreadable" error, that's it - no more swapping gamertags between consoles. It's not like previous ban waves where your console was flagged, but the actual effects of the flagging didn't activate until you connected to Live and got the "you're banned!" message. Just being flagged is enough now.
If your console hasn't been flagged and you wait for LT+, you should be OK (assuming LT+ does its job), as the new firmware should combat these new checks and your flashed console shouldn't fail the AP25 challenge (which is what causes the gamertag corruption) as long as your backups are 100% spot on.
QUOTE
And how many times has c4eva said his firmware is safe to later get hit by a ban wave?
No firmware can be future proof. How was c4eva supposed to know how this new protection works before it was even released? They have to analyse how it works (which means it actually has to exist first) and then do things to combat it. I don't see why anyone would give c4eva (or anyone else involved in creating the firmware) shit, because without people like that nobody would be playing backups.
This post has been edited by funksoulbrother: Oct 30 2010, 07:53 PM