QUOTE(iateshaggy @ Jun 24 2010, 07:49 AM)

i understand your point, i have one guy that until last week was still using 1.6 and not banned, but i know many people using 5.3 that aren't banned and none since last november that are. the only logical explanation i can draw from this is they aren't checking for 5.3 vulnerabilities right now. i do agree, we probably have different definitions of safe, but i literally mean safe right now until a dash update is received.
Again you are not fully understanding the concept!
Just because they have not been banned
yet doesn't mean m$ dont know they have a flashed drive!
If the likes of yourself, go round telling everyone they are "safe" using 5.3a (meanwhile m$ can easily spot that they are using hacked fw - but are chosing not to ban them yet!)
How many
more people will they have 'on file' ready for the next banwave because of your statements?
at which point, when the time comes, you will no doubt claim that the next dash update has detected the 5.3a fw -
when in fact all you have done is increased the total number of people banned by ill advising them!In short - when c4eva announced LT he publically stated that ALL previous fw's are detectable!
do you have the technical knowledge to disagree with his statements? - I know I don't!