insanity4all thank you

i was reading what you wrote, i agree only on one thing. They do not know to speak to the public correctly. What i believe is that, after they receiving so many critics, if they made the software payable. What would be the public reaction. I believe in that.
PS: i would make this firmware a payable one (15$ charge) and yes i wouldnt mind to be rich about it

but there is another issue, underinvestigation the autoraties would easily track down who was making ilegal modifications (also taxes wich must be applied accordingly ), and as you know, its illegal on most countries. They would go for jail, and would have to pay a large fine, the money was also confiscated. They also know about this, even so they work for free

They have no reason to make us pay 110 $.
hello slayer902 , when i say their software, i mean their making... and facts point that who made this work was them. You agree?
Their modding (wtv you consider is the same ) ! If you think its wrong on modifying also... Just dont comment, open a post or a page, criticising. But i think you are on the wrong forum to speak about it.
Either ways it isnt needed to be shown thanks... They were ironic in order to some of you wich criticise alot their job wich is not to be judged by us but only by Microsoft to know if they agree or not to this software ...
So by using facts i do not really see the point of arguing about this , because its a service... Even if it was paid. They choose what they think its best.
Regards