xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10

Author Topic: iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth  (Read 2291 times)

T3XA5360R3B3L

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #45 on: December 28, 2009, 10:39:00 AM »

god damn there sure are alot of dumb mother fuckers that can't comprehend why people got banned.

let's make this simple...

STEALTH FIRMWARE was detectable..

NON-STEALTH wasn't detectable..

1.6 ixtreme non-stealth doesn't do stealth checking.. if it doesn't stealth check, it doesn't register
any flagging within the Dash to then send to M$... Got it?!?!

stop asking the same god damn questions over and over.. geezus!! now I see why the Mods are
always closing threads.. all the clueless fucktards on here that can't READ.. I guess public school
education has really gone to the dogs...

Logged

gawl4

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #46 on: December 28, 2009, 10:43:00 AM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 12:37 PM) View Post

I don't see why you guys with banned consoles didn't just use an old non-stealth xtreme FW.
They had options for different read speeds, would boot any disc whether it had stealth or not.

This new flavour of "non stealth" ix1.6 is for those who don't want to use the activate disc to play wave 4/5 games, it still uses stealth.

I'm confused to why team jungle is releasing a new stealth ixtreme for liteons and calling it 1.61.
1.61 was updated to support wave 4 games, but it didn't like wave 5.  Since this will support wave 5, it should be called 1.62.


There is no old non-stealth firmware for lite-ons, that I know of.
Logged

zainday

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 101
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #47 on: December 28, 2009, 10:47:00 AM »

QUOTE(gawl4 @ Dec 28 2009, 09:43 AM) View Post

There is no old non-stealth firmware for lite-ons, that I know of.

EXACTLY what I was thinking.....
Logged

T3XA5360R3B3L

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #48 on: December 28, 2009, 10:56:00 AM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 11:42 AM) View Post

^wow, you are a moron.  everything you just said is wrong, quit spreading misinformation.


no I'm not wrong.. I had ixtreme 1.6 on 2 consoles since it's release, the key is I NEVER went online after the recent last Dash update. After that update is when the mass ban hammer happened to a whole bunch of people.

so before I even went back online, I downgraded both consoles to 1.41 non-stealth 12x for BenQ and then went online.. I got the Dash update and game update for CODMW2 and since then NEVER have been banned.

conclusion... non-stealth firmware with stealthed media isn't detectable... `yet'...



Logged

ToBbErT

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #49 on: December 28, 2009, 11:21:00 AM »

I'm confused to why team jungle is releasing a new stealth ixtreme for liteons and calling it 1.61.

This isnt a new ixtreme fw and it was never released for that purpose. Its just a byte hacked 1.6 version, released for the banned/offline consoles. The development of the ixtreme fw has stopped since it got detected. And there hasnt been added anything to support the wave 5 games, they just removed the stealth check. So it doesnt matter what new wave will come in the future couse this fw boots them all.
Logged

tech3475

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #50 on: December 28, 2009, 12:24:00 PM »

Hi, does this work with SL xbox 360/original xbox backups?

Also what is the best version for the original liteon (cant recall specific model number)? There is the original and then a repack file.
Logged

Obveron

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 195
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #51 on: December 28, 2009, 12:44:00 PM »

no SL on any FW.  read the thread, this is just a version of ix1.6 that works as if the activate.iso is used.
Logged

T3XA5360R3B3L

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #52 on: December 28, 2009, 12:52:00 PM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 01:44 PM) View Post

no SL on any FW.  read the thread, this is just a version of ix1.6 that works as if the activate.iso is used.


dumbass.. the activate.iso turns the stealth/wave checking off.. If the modified firmware is set as if the activate.iso is being used, then the drive powers up with essentially a non-stealth firmware.

the stealth checking code is still in the firmware but it's essentially turned off with the hex edit.

I've been around for several years on here.. this account with very little posts doesn't mean I'm a newbie..

anyone that has stealth enabled firmware on their drives and is running with the latest Dash update from early November is going to get flagged or has already been flagged for a ban..

I have yet to see ANYONE that has been running non-stealth firmware with stealthed media get banned...

Logged

the soul poet

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 180
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #53 on: December 28, 2009, 01:11:00 PM »

QUOTE(T3XA5360R3B3L @ Dec 28 2009, 07:52 PM) View Post

dumbass.. the activate.iso turns the stealth/wave checking off.. If the modified firmware is set as if the activate.iso is being used, then the drive powers up with essentially a non-stealth firmware.

the stealth checking code is still in the firmware but it's essentially turned off with the hex edit.

I've been around for several years on here.. this account with very little posts doesn't mean I'm a newbie..

anyone that has stealth enabled firmware on their drives and is running with the latest Dash update from early November is going to get flagged or has already been flagged for a ban..

I have yet to see ANYONE that has been running non-stealth firmware with stealthed media get banned...


Your doing a lot of assuming here. Just because in your little scenario you have 2 consoles not currently banned does not mean your results are fact of the whole banning process.

There has and will always be banning from older firmwares. Just like new one's not everyone gets banned.  You hear/see more about new firmware users being banned cause most people upgraded.

So calm down and stop name calling or using your opinion as fact, truth is and probably always will, we don't know the direct cause for a banning, only educated guesses.

Xtreme,Ixtreme and LT will all be detectable at some point as there are too many variations and user conditions to factor.

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 07:55 PM) View Post

no, the activate.iso disables strict compliance for stealth files, the fw will still use any stealth if present.

just stop, you are spreading bullsh|t



Although activate disc does technically enable a copy with no stealth to run.
Logged

Takashi

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 899
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #54 on: December 28, 2009, 01:17:00 PM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 02:55 PM) View Post

just stop, you are spreading bullsh|t

You all are spreading bullshit.

This thread is not for discussing live safety, or rumors/speculation.
Go to the newbie section.
Logged

Obveron

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 195
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #55 on: December 28, 2009, 01:34:00 PM »

QUOTE(Takashi @ Dec 28 2009, 09:17 PM) View Post

You all are spreading bullshit.

This thread is not for discussing live safety, or rumors/speculation.
Go to the newbie section.



what?
i never posted any ban speculation or asked any questions about bannings.  i've answered some questions about this fw, and gave a sensible reply to the wacko who thinks we all can't read, and that we all should know that non-stealth firmware is the safest.
Logged

the soul poet

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 180
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #56 on: December 28, 2009, 01:35:00 PM »

QUOTE(dejoxxxx @ Dec 28 2009, 08:32 PM) View Post

anyone got banned using this 1.6 non-stealth? really anyone  uhh.gif

somehow i thing this might be safer online than 1.61 c4eva fw?
Maybe m$ checks something on dvd disc that's blocked with 1.6?

Conspiracy theories?  ph34r.gif  jester.gif


No it's not safer at all.  The point being it doesn't follow all original drive checks so still big risk. Get offline my advice to those online...
Logged

tech3475

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #57 on: December 28, 2009, 02:21:00 PM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Dec 28 2009, 07:44 PM) View Post

no SL on any FW.  read the thread, this is just a version of ix1.6 that works as if the activate.iso is used.


I did read the thread, I have never used activate.iso hence why I didnt know.
Logged

jtupnsmoke

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #58 on: December 28, 2009, 04:33:00 PM »

I have a nonbanned box with stock firmware, but I want to play my backups offline with this 1.6ns until LT comes out. Does anyone know if it is safe to flash and play ONLY offline and then flash to LT when it comes out? Or can this new update catch the change in firmware and once I connect to Live it will flag me?
Logged

Takashi

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 899
iXtreme v1.6 Non-Stealth
« Reply #59 on: December 28, 2009, 04:40:00 PM »

This is perfect for banned 360's, or boxes that will never go online.
Not live safe, and not offline safe either, will be flagged.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10