QUOTE(steplay29 @ Dec 12 2011, 02:39 PM)

hi just updated a jasper 512mb with the new version 0.7 and it worked a treat even for me lol.am going to to the kids two falcons v3 but when i run the progam beside option 5:it says a falcon with cb 5771,but my two falcons are 5770.just wondering is it ok to go ahead and flash this or to wait?
hello, just ignore the [CB5771] it was meant only for RGH since before "Multi Builder" this used to be "Easy ggBuilder" for RGH only

so go ahead and flash your Jtag falcons with CB_5770, it will work fine.
Anyway I just fixed the CB labels for next release

QUOTE(steveo1978 @ Dec 12 2011, 06:53 PM)

Does it say something like "block 0xfe seems bad error 0x00000204" if so then consider your self lucky I get about 20 or more of those in rawflash but every thing is fine. I have not found a solid reason for those errors, but I will not worry about it until I find out if its actually a bad thing.
"block 0xfe seems bad error 0x00000204" --> this error is issued from RawFlash when it finds an empty block while flashing, it's more then a warning then a real error and the meant block is actually fine and not bad, so don't worry at all about the "204" error

QUOTE(Dicko316 @ Dec 12 2011, 07:00 PM)

After using flash360v1.0 to update to dash 14699 and then going back to 13604.
using "Flash360" is much more recommended to dump/flash the nand, it seems to handle the bad or empty blocks better then "Rawflash"
QUOTE
Then using rawflashv3 to update again to dash 14699 that error has now gone!
yes, this is logical, because "Rawflash v3" seems also to use differential flash method, the blocks that caused the error "204" were marked as empty/zerod "FF" then the corresponding blocks from the image being flashed are also empty, so "Rawflash v3" will skip them on your second flash attempt and you won't see the error "204" (which should be only a warning)