Topic: JungleFlasher v0.1.84 (250) (Read 354 times)

joe90 · « **Reply #15 on:** June 15, 2011, 05:17:00 AM »

Just to say worked a treat on my phat liteon.

1) reflashed with stock FW
2) updated.
3) reflashed with 1.9
4) All fine.. can connect to live etc etc, secdata still clean

Took 10 mins (bar the update), had to reboot the pc three times

Thanks for all the effort.

kronas · « **Reply #16 on:** June 15, 2011, 05:35:00 AM »

apologies if this is a noob question but what will the diffarence be between LT 1.9 and LT 2.0 ?

bucky006 · « **Reply #17 on:** June 15, 2011, 05:43:00 AM »

Can I still use DOS flash to flash 1.9, as I have no end of issue with Jungleflasher in Windows.

Thanks

Bucky

pv3nomq · « **Reply #18 on:** June 15, 2011, 06:23:00 AM »

QUOTE(kronas @ Jun 15 2011, 05:35 AM)

apologies if this is a noob question but what will the diffarence be between LT 1.9 and LT 2.0 ?

The difference between the two is 1.9 will let us play online with new dash update WITHOUT new disc format for now... 2.0 (when released) will let us play our backups of upcoming games that will contain the new disc format.

Hope this helps...

old_soul · « **Reply #19 on:** June 15, 2011, 07:24:00 AM »

Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned. It has been stated hundreds of times.... When the update came, I simply played ONLINE with originals on my non-modded system...didn't have a pressing rush for 1.9/2.0.

LightningStruckMyXbox · « **Reply #20 on:** June 15, 2011, 07:32:00 AM »

QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 05:24 AM)

Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned. It has been stated hundreds of times.... When the update came, I simply played ONLINE with originals on my non-modded system...didn't have a pressing rush for 1.9/2.0.

want a cookie?

360fan123 · « **Reply #21 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:00:00 AM »

QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 02:24 PM)

Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned.

I agree with you there, but who cares, it's their problem.

pv3nomq · « **Reply #22 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:13:00 AM »

QUOTE(old_soul @ Jun 15 2011, 07:24 AM)

Can't believe people still want to flash and be able to play "backups" online, but worry about getting banned. If you flash, you run the risk of getting banned. It has been stated hundreds of times.... When the update came, I simply played ONLINE with originals on my non-modded system...didn't have a pressing rush for 1.9/2.0.

QUOTE(360fan123 @ Jun 15 2011, 08:00 AM)

I agree with you there, but who cares, it's their problem.

Comments like that, and if thats the way you kind of people feel then this isnt the place for you. This is our choice, get off these threads and dont worry about it. We dont need to hear it. Now run along and play.

old_soul · « **Reply #23 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:34:00 AM »

QUOTE(LightningStruckMyXbox @ Jun 15 2011, 08:32 AM)

want a cookie?

Sure, oreo will do

mik30 · « **Reply #24 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:36:00 AM »

QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)

Don't talk about stuff you know jack sh*t about

Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.

QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)

MS made this new 0251 firmware,

I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.

QUOTE(cypher21 @ Jun 15 2011, 09:26 AM)

and removed all barcode and serial info from it.

Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.

radoman · « **Reply #25 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:51:00 AM »

QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:36 PM)

Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.

Well, I redumped my liteon via mra after the update last night. When I spoofed source(full new ofw) to the target (liteon lt1.9). JF said serial data not copied - already matches. This means the serial data is now the same on all fat liteons. You will only need the drive key.

lrod2344 · « **Reply #26 on:** June 15, 2011, 08:58:00 AM »

QUOTE(mik30 @ Jun 15 2011, 03:36 PM)

Well, I do know that the serial is not copied. If you do not get that, that´s your prob.
I am not talking about the FW. I am talking about JF.
Totally wrong. The 025 FW includes a serial and a barcode data.
The question is: Is it correct that M$ overwrites the drives
date with universal one? I doubt that.

I for one dont know WHAT M$ does.... I have neither the tools nor the expertise to even find out.... I DO KNOW however that C4E and the whole Jungle Team put ALOT of time AND effort into these CFWs and the testing as I understand is furious.... that being said I dont think they would overlook something like the barcode and serial info.... if the new OFW inserts a "universal" 025 FW then Im sure thats why LT+ 1.9 also has this....I COULD be wrong but I also understand the risks involved and accept them....

I can also confirm that I did 6 consoles of varying drives (4 LiteOns and 2 BenQs) last night and used various methods... Updated first then reflashed.... flashed first then updated.... used Jungle Flasher as well as DOSFLASH and all have been sucessful thus far..... however you ABSOLUTELY MUST HAVE YOUR DVD KEY.... So the absolute BEST and safest method would be to re-read your current FW and save the Drive Key FIRST and FOREMOST.... once you are sure you have the correct key then go ahead and flash to stock first then update console then flash LT+ 1.9.... I have a LiteOn test drive that I use in place of ANY LiteOn drive as they are so sensitive.... I actually bricked one the first time around last night in windows so I HAD to use DOSFLASH to flash 1.9 and it worked like a charm

falcon3601 · « **Reply #27 on:** June 15, 2011, 10:11:00 AM »

One quick question.With lt1,9 on a ms28 sammy drive can I play original xgd3 discs?I mean can that drive support that kind of disc format?

Obveron · « **Reply #28 on:** June 15, 2011, 10:55:00 AM »

Of course, any 360 drive can play any orginals, including xgd3. And when LT 2.0 comes out it will play xgd3 backups. Samsung drives can't respond to AP 2.5 challenges. In that regard, they are blessed. For samsung owners, you don't need to reburn your games every time MS updates the challenges.

Out of curiosity, can the traditional dvdkey method of reading the key from phat liteons (solder serial db9 with max 3232 chip) still be accomplished AFTER the drive has been flashed with the new OFW?

micro23 · « **Reply #29 on:** June 15, 2011, 01:25:00 PM »

QUOTE(Obveron @ Jun 15 2011, 04:55 PM)

Of course, any 360 drive can play any orginals, including xgd3. And when LT 2.0 comes out it will play xgd3 backups. Samsung drives can't respond to AP 2.5 challenges. In that regard, they are blessed. For samsung owners, you don't need to reburn your games every time MS updates the challenges.
Out of curiosity, can the traditional dvdkey method of reading the key from phat liteons (solder serial db9 with max 3232 chip) still be accomplished AFTER the drive has been flashed with the new OFW?

This is also my question. Can you take an old fat liteon, never flash it.... update it then retrieve the key and flash it with the latest firmware?

Thanks for the hard work everyone.

Author Topic: JungleFlasher v0.1.84 (250) (Read 354 times)