QUOTE(MrFish @ Nov 7 2010, 12:46 PM)

1) Only in jurisdictions that forbid unilateral contracts
2) If that's really the case, then the author would have to explicitly grant permission for each and every download of the source, because copying is one of the rights reserved to the author under copyright law.
Since 2) is insane and clearly not intended, there must be some form of implicit license. If I were a user of this program, I might be more at ease were it codified and clarified.
If you are the author, you'd better reimplement, or eliminate fnmatch.c: it's GPLv2 or later, and therefore incompatible with the licensing of the work as a whole. The FSF is not terribly litigious, but it does have lawyers and money.
All of this crap just gives me a headache. There is actually no copyright notice inside the abgx360 CLI app binary or the windows installer, only in the GUI source/binary, abgx360.c and website html because those are the only files which i have actually made entirely from scratch. If I have no right to say what can be done with the work as a whole because it depends on source code or libraries that are not public domain and require a certain license for derivative works, then I will not claim such a right.
Look, all i want is for people to stop making shitty versions of abgx360 that get stuck in an endless loop of
hammering the database or making
official sounding websites full of misinformation or potential viruses.